Search results

How can anyone reject Christ's gospel of the Kingdom? And side with the Pharisees instead?

No! I was deceived by Dispensationalism for many years yet saved.

I guess I assumed most people would know I was not talking about the trinity or the ecumenical creeds. Sorry, I'll try to be less condescending in the future. I have several doctrines I can mention but I would like to see if you and others can spot them.

It's what Jesus taught. Have you ever studied his gospel of the Kingdom? You should.

So you assumed I was speaking about the Trinity? And other true doctrines of the early centuries? I needed to clarify to you that I was not.

This is not what it says. The 1000 years = the binding of Satan. “And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no...

How did I state it? Got a quote?

“Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh...

Jesus refuted all but Amillennialism in the gospels. But only the born again can see the Kingdom so this presents a problem.

You are making a huge mistake. You assume John is referring to the Pharisees Pre-Millennialism just because he mentions 1000 Years. But he is not. 1000 means "a lot" "many" if you are familiar with the OT usage. Plus, Scripture never mentions a millennium so you are adding to God's word when you...

Jesus destroyed the Pharisee's Millennial Kingdom ideas if you pay close attention to the gospel of the Kingdom preached by Jesus in the gospels. But keep in mind, only the born-again can see it.

See if you can find one in scripture?

In scripture, it is only a public commitment. If Jesus turned water into wine at a wedding/marriage, how could you conceive of anything else?

I'm talking about false doctrines unique to the Catholic Church refuted by the Reformers. But many are blind to the origins of the doctrines they cherish.

You are reading your ideas into Revelation and not learning what John is saying. It's called newspaper eisegesis. Hal Lindsey, the false prophet made millions doing this.

How much Catholicism is in protestant churches today? It means Antichrist still remains seated in the temple of God doctrinally.

Whatever is not of faith is sin. Even a Boyscout helping an old lady cross the street is a sin, if not done in faith towards God.

It is purely a legal contract today. It was purely an announcement of dedication to one another back in the day. But we have sodomite marriages today, adulterous marriages, and what have you. Jesus turned water into wine at a wedding/marriage.

Much of what Jesus said did fulfill prophecy. You can keep the literal separate if you can spot its reference in the OT. When Jesus said he is the temple of God, it is literal for in Him dwells all of the fulness of God (the trinity) bodily. It depends on how much time you dedicate to OT studies.

“And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.” Revelation 12:1–2 (KJV 1900) How do you get anything but symbolism...