Search results

You made that clear about me from day one before I even posted anything about Calvinism because I offended your dear antifundamentalist friend Jeri Massi, who thinks that all Baptists are perverts and child molesters. You defended an astrology worshiping Buddhist lover and then shut your mouth...

Excellent point! [snipped another attempt to divert from the "point" of the thread into a Calvinism debate. Tiresome and juvenile.]

I'm just getting started. Wait till you see my next article!! Will be up by the end of morning (daylight for you)

Also curious if you advised Rick Norris (Logos) about the same "advertising rules" that you just said to me: "My new 100 page booklet entitled KJV-only Myths About Archaic Words is now available at www.lulu.com It is a greatly expanded and revised edition of a chapter on archaic words in my...

It was not an advertisement for my website, it was simply a link to an article that I just happened to write, and me siting it is no different than anyone else site other websites in support of their arguments, and quoting numerous copyrighted material without permission from the authors which...

No Paul is not saying that this light shined out of our INNER DARKNESS. It is in context of hiding the gospel to those who ARE LOST. The darkness Paul is referring to is EXTERNAL circumstances that cause obfuscation of the gospel: *Hidden things of dishonesty *Walking in crafiness...

You are ascribing this 'inner knowledge" to a person before they are even saved and acting as if the person possesses this 'inner knowledge' which then becomes activated upon actual salvation thus resurrecting a dormant inner gnosis. That is absolute pure Gnostic garbage. You can't claim that...

Verse 45 is actually a solid refutation of the Calvinist view of "draw". The Calvinist view of total inability claims that no man could possibly learn of the Father or hear him and be taught until AFTER they have been drawn and saved irresistibly. Verse 45 shows the exact opposite, that those...

What a stupid comment. So does that mean that Calvinists who do not follow the rules on the BB do not value the sovereignty of God?

Do Righter Cynthia McLaskey Hebrew Blundering of Genesis 25:21 [Promoting other websites? If there is a discussion for HERE, please start it. If you want free advertising for a KJVonly site, have the honesty to pay for it]

No not everyone, only Non Calvinist are required to post in that forum, Calvinist postings can post whereever they want. http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=86705 Post 6 and 7. I was given a warning about starting threads involving Calvinism at the same time Doc responded to that thread...

If you are trying to find the C/A forum, it is linked by Skandelon in the top sticky thread by Dr. Bob "Moving to Calvinism/Arminian Forum". Once you get to that forum, you will notice that there are only 2 threads there, even though it appears that several other threads have been moved to...

So does Rippon get the same warning I got about posting in the Calvinist/Arminian thread? And is this not a thread that should have been moved when you moved my thread on Ezekiel 3 to that forum?? I would really like an answer to my thread in the Calvinist/Arminian forum as to what...

Of course "could have been" is clearly implied in the text. Why else would God hold someone accountable. First of all, if it were not POSSIBLE that the sinner COULD BE saved by the warning, then there would be no logical reason for the witness to warn in the first place. Your rebuttal here...

This is not an answer because Paul WARNED THEM, so this actually fits Ezekiel 3 of eliminating the responsibility of the witness to give a warning. Ezekiel 3 makes it clear that a sinner can TURN FROM RIGHTEOUSNESS as a direct result of the witness FAILING TO WARN HIM which clearly indicates...

Welcome to the Arminianist Club because that is a direct quote from Jacobus Arminius. Works of Arminius, Volume 2, page 192. :wavey:

You are ASSUMING that God has predestinated the salvation of His elect THE VERY FIRST TIME they hear the gospel! What gives you the right to make that ASSUMPTION??? Does not God's word say some "plant" while other "water"?????? Wow, this is a truly sick display of equivocation and trying to...

I would like to see how many Calvinist/Reformers etc.. disagree with the following: "In this state of free will of man towards the True Good is not only maimed, wounded, bent, weakened, infirm; but it is also imprisoned, destroyed, and lost: And its powers are not only debilitated and...

I disagree with all 5 points of TULIP. Eternal Security (which I believe) is not the same as Perseverance of the Saints which is why I reject it. I would say there are some Calvinist camps that believe in eternal security AND perseverance of the saints, but the 2 are not the same. The...

First of all, I am not an Arminian AT ALL, and never claimed to be such. But, I actually know what Arminius really believed because I have studied him and actually read his writings which I can certainly say that many Calvinists have not. You have not even addressed all the different positions...