Search results

Non Sequitur since this is not about OSAS and OSAS is something that I rigorously defend. This is a terrible rebuttal that ignores the plain reading of the text. How could God "providentially" bring a witness to the sinner, and then be accused at the same time of failing to warn him? It...

Before I get to the rest of your post, I want to address this first because I've noticed a pattern in several posts now. I don't know what makes you think that every thread I start or every post I make is about some position that YOU hold. I don't know if you noticed, but there really are other...

That, and the SEALS killed in Benghazi, the shooting of Chris Kyle, the public ridicule of the author of details about SEAL Team 6 missions, all came from the White House after the SEALS public ridiculed the Obama administration about taking credit for the work THEY did, and the continued flack...

Nah, never read the Gospels. Memorized the New Testament but never actually read it, what was I thinking? And you have a lot of nerve asking if anyone has ever read the Gospels. I can fit all your posts in one thread where you have yet to even cite ANY Bible verse let alone question whether...

Biblicist Just because I have not responded to these verses YET doesn't mean I won't get to them. These verses were not explained how they support his argument, and were merely cut and pasted from this website The dead give away was were some of the "notes" at the end of the verses that he...

By election, of course, I am referring to the Reformed/Calvinist view of election, that God has elected all who will be saved, the list is made up and determined, those elected can not resist, and man has no free will and no choice in the matter. Ezekiel 3 disagrees. 18 When I say unto the...

Well then that's it isn't it! Quote 20 verse totally out of their context and just build a conclusion around all of them so that folks will think because you sited 20 verses that wallah that supports the conclusion without the possibility that each one of those verses has an entirely different...

:thumbs: Excellent analysis. Nothing but net.

Wow you are some piece of work. In John 6 you argue that the early verses come first, then in Jeremiah 31 and 1 Corinthians you argue that the last verses define the context. Why not start in Revelation? You pick and choose a proof text and then build your own context around it. 17 For...

You can stop any time now trying to expound on any English or Greek grammatical structure that DOES NOT fit your argument. That might work on some of your weaker friends who don't know any better, but not here. τῇ γὰρ χάριτί (<grace) ἐστε σεσῳσμένοι διὰ τῆς πίστεως(<faith) καὶ τοῦτο(<that)...

Calling to what?? Read the context the "calling" is not about salvation. It's about PREACHING and being MINSTERS OF THE GOSPEL. There is not one iota or inkling of anyone being called to salvation by an effectual call. That is pure eisegesis. It only demands "effectual calling" because you are...

Wow dude are you BLIND??? It isn't about a DIFFERENT GOSPEL. It's about a DIFFERENT COVENANT that involves PHYSICAL PROMISES TO ISRAEL as well as opening their eyes to the offer of the gospel that they are NOW blinded to. "For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this...

Gift nor "doron" appear in ANY of those verses. NOT ONE TIME. These verse describe the distinction between faith in and of Christ from faith in self, the law, pagan deities or a doorknob. It says NOTHING about faith being a "gift", not once.

Repeatedly?? PROVE IT. Prove that the Bible "REPEATEDLY" shows that faith is a gift. As usually, reading faith as a gift into Ephesias 2:8 when it clearly shows SALVATION is the gift, not faith. Funny you say that "all through the Bible faith is shown as a gift" and can't come up with more...

That's putting the cart before the horse. We don't get a new heart first and then choose to believe (what your statement implies) we choose to believe first and THEN get a new heart. This is easily refutable. You had 2 options: A to post; B not to post. You chose to not respond to some of my...

First of all, Romans 1 completely annihilates the Calvinist view that man can not know anything about God apart from His regenerating them from their deadness. Romans 1 in which you quote is a PERFECT example of FREE WILL. Romans says they hardened their OWN hearts, they willingly refused to...

That is because you don't know how to read anything objectively and twist scripture to fit your presuppositions instead of letting the Bible speak for itself. This verse says nothing of God compelling you against your will to DO and to WILL. When you YIELD to God, His will works in you to...

"Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near: 7 Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the Lord, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. 8 For my thoughts are not your...

__________________ Oh this is about as funny as Icon getting tricked into attacking his own "scholars". Icon just quoted himself, and told himself that he can't grasp God converting someone. :laugh: Icon, whichever one of you made the last comment, tell him I agree!

Let him emphasize 2 Cor 5:11 again! "WE PERSUADE MEN". Does Paul PERSUADING someone to believe sound like irresistible grace or an appeal to the will to believe! He done stole one of my favorite texts and tried to use on us Non Cals.