Search results

Out of all of the liberals out there that push for "equality" and "tolerance" funny that you picked a JEWISH website to claim that the law has been passed in Florida about hate-speech BECAUSE OF JEWS. Your hatred for Jews is quite obvious. Every time something arises in the news , you find...

Nobody makes a false prediction BECAUSE they are a dispensationalist. Unless you believe that Jesus is ruling right here and now, then you too are a dispensationalist. You may not be a 7 point, 5 point, or hyper-dispensationalist, but if Jesus is coming back AT ALL, at ANY time in the future...

I'm posting it out in the open because it's a concern that DOZENS of us have, and some simply don't want to send any PMs to the mods for fear of reprisal. Since a couple in particular already think I hate God, I don't mind putting my neck on the chopping block so at least someone else can get...

So what you're saying is just chalk it up to coincidence that you just happened to start a thread about Romans 8:7 right after mine was closed, and the OP even had my name on it as an example of why you were posting said thread, but would have us believe it is a totally separate issue and has...

Semantics. The fact that you quoted my name on the thread shows it is merely an extension of the exact same subject that was closed when I was the author. Also, if you're going to post my emails on threads, then tell the truth. I didn't say I "taught Greek", I said I took Greek 7 years...

So just so we Non Calvinists that "hate the sovereignty of God" are clear, it would be nice if the administrators here can tell us what we can and can not post about Calvinism. Or is that a violation of the rules to even ask that? I had a post closed down about Romans 8:7 and it was closed...

I am also convinced that the "His Witness" account belonged to an administrator. I had noticed that the account was banned for about 30 minutes then it was unbanned and posting on a thread I created about the love of God, which turned the entire thread into a debate over the name of Christ, and...

He's doing so because one particular administrator lets him get away with doing that to any thread I post, even if it puts him in agreement with a 7th Day Adventist. There are a few main characters that do this to every thread I post, then they go whining to the admin that I'm picking on them to...

One of the reasons that sabbath is so misinterpreted, not only by 7DA's but also most dominionists, kingdom now, preterists, historicists and covenanters is because they miss the fact that there are SEVERAL sabbaths in the OT. Perhaps I will come back later and explain that but I see why...

Of course not, I assume you've been following the trend of who it DOES apply to.

I don't care if you ban me for this or not, but as an administrate who has a doctorate, your accusations against Non Calvinists, especially toward me, are unfounded, un-Christian, and your discriminatory treatment of all those who do not support your Calvinist presuppositions are disheartening...

Again, you merely allude to INABILITY by CONCLUSION-NOT BY EXEGESIS. Everytime you BOOTSTRAP inability to Romans 8:7, you define it as inability, but EXPLAIN IT AS DEPRAVITY. You are confusing both of these terms together without making the case for inability from Romans 8:7. If "CAN BE" is...

One of these days you will learn the difference in how to define your own views. Everytime you are confronted with the contradictions of your interpretation, you continue to punt to an explanation of DEPRAVITY instead of defending the view of INABILITY. You explain DEPRAVITY which most agree...

Wow is that ever a lame excuse. Just because the OP is about Romans 8:7 doesn't mean that I intended on addressing your view of this verse without addressing the context. The reason I chose (freely that is) to address Romans 8:7 is BECAUSE you were taking it out of context. You have proven...

Sunset is the definition of evening, 6pm is the TIME. I just showed you that from the New Testament. So if you accuse Christians of changing the Sabbath day, then when did 6pm change?? If Christians changed the day, YOU CHANGED THE TIME. And furthermore, even if you were to go by "sunset"...

My position is defending exegetically perfectly from the OP. You are adding total inability and continue to see that I AM NOT REFUTING THAT MAN HAS A SIN NATURE, THAT HE IS DEPRAVED. I agree with Romans 3:23, Eph 2:1-2 (not the way the Calvinists do). I am NOT SAYING, nor have I said for one...

The Jewish timetable has ALWAYS been from "6pm to 6pm". ALWAYS. It is divided into 2 divisions of 12 hours. This is why you see the "third hour" being referred to in the in Mark 15:35 (see also Acts 2:15 where they are showing they couldn't be drunk seeing it was only the 3rd hour of the...

All that wasted drivel that was simply rehashing the same rubber stamped rhetoric and you saved the best for last: " Once again proving that Calvie's (as I just proved in my previous post) use one definition in one place-here the terms of salvation-and use them in another place that has...

Once again, total epic fail to understand what I said. You Calvie's are so used to "rubber stamp" responses you don't even bother to actually read the posts. You fail to see the difference between my view of depravity, and my argument against inability...

Let me illustrate how the Calvie's proof text their own definitions when it suits them: http://www.baptistboard.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=2011285 See how when 2 Peter 3:9 is show to prove that God does not want ANYONE to perish, the Calvies pull out the "it's talking about only...