Search results

I decided to take a post I made in another thread and make it's own thread. I would like to make a few comments about repentance, Repentance absolutely is necessary for salvation. there are many who will not get saved because they know that getting saved will change them, and many of them do...

I would like to make a few comments about repentance, Repentance absolutely is necessary, there are many who will not get saved because they know that getting saved will change them, and many of them do not want to be saved out of sin, I have met people who told me they believed Christ died for...

amen brother.

Isn't it obvious that "yom" (day) here means a long period of time, don't you know that to the Jews 6 days is 6 billions years and that they are observe the sabbath "day" for a billion years... I am being sarcastic of course to show the inconsistency of trying to apply long periods of time to...

So do you think man has been around for 4.5 billion years? Jesus said he created man and female at the beginning... Doesn't really line up with the model we are given in evolution. This thread stinks of unbelief and a worship of science falsely called so. if whatever science is being...

and how old do you think the age of the earth is?

I have a question for you Evan, Do you believe that there exists anywhere on this earth for us to observe, a complete, perfect, inerrant bible?

Probably because they are following in the footsteps of the apostate scholars that went before them without realizing the unbelief prevalent in the theories handed down to them. All of the "top" scientists in this world also believe in evolution, doesn't mean it's true.

if Yom means more than a 24 hour day.. Was Jesus lying when he said God made man and female at the beginning?

https://answersingenesis.org/theory-of-evolution/millions-of-years/jesus-devastates-an-old-earth/ enjoy :)

4. Erasmus knew that the manuscripts he selected reflected the reading of the common text, and he was guided by this “common faith.” “Long before the Protestant Reformation, the God-guided usage of the Church had produced throughout Western Christendom a common faith concerning the New...

ANSWER: 1. Erasmus had knowledge of many manuscripts other than those he used for his first edition. Erasmus “began studying and collating NT MSS and observing thousands of variant readings in preparation for his own edition” (Eldon Jay Epp, “Decision Points in New Testament Textual...

3. This isn't even true, the following info will come from Will Kinney: "Here is the story that is usually told concerning the reading of "BOOK of life" as opposed to "tree of life" - AG Green said, "Erasmus borrowed the manuscript on Revelation from his friend Johann Reuchlin, a German...

The text does not say anything about catching anything in hands, and I do not believe it is a a mistranslation. 1. What makes the KJV Special is the translators scholarly ability, the translation process that they used, not to mention God's providence around that time, a Jesuit plot to...

How does 400 more years of being removed from a dead language produce better scholarship? I would think the understanding would tend to deteriorate rather than get better. Also I do believe one of the King James Translators learned somewhere around 20ish Middle Eastern Languages. Not to...

it says the spider takes hold with her hands...makes perfect sense when you think about it being in the corner clinging to the wall.... it does not say is caught in hand. a lot of people think covereth feet refers to..well using the bathroom, dropping your clothes and covering you feet. I...

For each place you argue as a translation error, I'm sure I could find scholars on the other side of the argument you make, I simply do not have time to argue with you about them.

my point is that there are going to be understanding and interpretation issues in all translations. So to cry out that the King James bible has problems with understanding words and has uncommon words is not valid, because this is going to be a problem with other translations as well, and...

Do the modern translations even give the same translations of those words? The NIV translates "hyrax" instead coney. That's a real common easy to understand word... not. the NASB uses the word "shaphan".. whatever that is. the NIT uses "rock badger" Young's Literal uses rabbit...

perhaps you could explain why those books were placed in a separate section all on it's own?