Search results

It did such a poor job of "disconnecting Jesus from the Son of Man" that it didn't do it at all.

Keep up your mantra.

You might be surprised that your favorite version uses more functional equivalence that you currently know. I use the NIV as my primary translation, but always use other versions to complement my understanding of the text. Plus I use commentaries after that. Being as iteral as possible...

Your disordered mind is jumping all around. You were referencing Psalms and Hebrews earlier. And like usual you don't bother to give references. I hope you have figured out that you are not the Holy Spirit by now.

Because word-for-word is a fiction.

Who are you to make that determination? It is most certainly my primary translation. Get off your high horse. The CSB, NET, NAB, and NIV are mediating versions. You can toss in a few more such as the old MLB. The NLT could be someone's primary translation. And that would be fine.

Y-1, read my posts #103 and #106 carefully and thoughtfully. I have spoken plainly. I have asked for 15 years, ever since the TNIV was out --to stop lying about the NIV. It increases your sin every time you make such wicked charges against it. If I was standing in front of you I would place my...

The Modern Language Bible of 51 years ago translates the verse almost exactly as the NIV : MLB : but if you suffer as a Christian, do not be ashamed, but praise God because you bear that name. The Kingdom New Testament by N.T. Wright : But if you suffer as a Christian, don't be ashamed; rather...

Wrong again. Give up while you're behind.

You're being blasphemous.

You are particularly and grievously wrong about verbal and plenary inspiration.

No, it is an example of how misinformed you are.

Not only should you stop lying, you should never, ever, quote an entire post of mine and make a reply that has nothing to do with my post. Grow up and deal with your responsibilities.

Produce the texts from the NIV to substantiate your unfounded claims. That's what I have been saying from Day One. You have never complied. You can't do it because nothing you have said against the NIV is true, but you go blissfully on the BB and other sites spewing your garbage.

A bright one.

Your links are bogus. You rarely read them. Most of the time they have absolutely nothing to do with your inane charges. None have said the specific things you have charged the NIV with. You are too lazy to man up and cite particular texts of the NIV that support your irresponsible accusations...

And you have never, and I mean never, proven any of your false allegations that you have made in the last 15 years against the NIV by showing specific passages from the text. What a coward, you sling throw mud and don't support anything by citing the text of the NIV to prove your reckless...

Is your mind mush? I just reminded you that you were fine with inclusive language of the ESV that was not present in the 1984 NIV. But you didn't dare say that the ESV "bowed down to political correctness and evangelical feminism." You didn't claim that the ESV "renderings go against traditional...

Job 9:2 ESV : Truly I know that it is so: But how can a man be in the right before God? NIV : Indeed, I know that this is true. But how can mere mortals prove their innocence before God? 9:2 ESV : The earth is given into the hand of the wicked; he covers the faces of its judges NIV : When a...

I still can't believe you said the above. You have to have a memory hole. The following is what you said regarding the NLT on 12/29/2018 : "Its like reading the NIV edition, but even more gender inclusive." Ancestor NIV : 9 times NLT 437 Father NIV : 1231 NLT 949 Men NIV : 1080 NLT 960...