Search results

The reason I said what I said is that if you knew that ALL men were deserving of Hell, you would not think that God not saving some would be unfair. That's what reveals your real thoughts on this matter. You think that God is obligated to show mercy.

"If your eyes cause you to sin, pluck them out".

Two truths: 1) And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. 2) If one does not love God and is not called according to His purpose, even "good" thing that happen to him only condemn him. Every single thing that...

It's not my viewpoint that I am expressing here. It's the Reformed viewpoint. I'm saying that you don't understand the Calvinist position, Bob. It's Okay, no one who disagrees with it does.

I will have to disagree with you, my friend. Satan works in far more subtile ways. His strategy is to remain unseen — to "fly under the radar".

You imagine that men are in a morally neutral position, Bob. You speak of them not being at enmity with their Creator. That one thing keeps you from understanding the biblical position on this subject. If you understand "total depravity", you would understand the rest.

I don't care if you disagree, Bob. I care that you don't understand, yet disagree. That's the problem. You can't disagree with what you don't comprehend.

God uses means. That's been explained to you several times before. Also, you really should be able to distinguish between election and salvation. They are of course related, but election comes first, obviously.

A tweet from: Lauren Southern‏Verified account @Lauren_Southern I'm not kidding about this, but during my questioning by the UK police... I was asked about my Christianity and whether I'm a radical. I was also asked how I feel about running Muslims over with cars.

Reality is harsh, and I've had more than my "fair" share. Judgemental? Nope. Not me, sir.

As soon as I picked it up, I knew. . .

I just expect everyone to read my mind, Hank. Is that unreasonable? ;)

I show grace even to those who intentionally sin, and have done so repeatedly, for I am the most vile of sinners. What I find disagreeable, wrongheaded and unhelpful, is treating sinners as victims who had no part in their condition. Calling a drunkard an "alcoholic" isn't helpful to them or a...

This is fantastic, too:

There is no gender pay gap, and no one said that your daughter can't be a journalist. One must look at all of the factors regarding the "pay gap". Here is a brief video that might be helpful.

The soy thing is science, Just as there are only two genders, and homosexuals can't reproduce, and abortion is the ending of a life. I mention soy out of genuine concern. Too few real men in the world. Most are effeminate beta types, and that is caused by being raised by women and drinking soy...

Thought so. I've hit the nail squarely on the head, and your "reply" tells me so.

So, we shouldn't tell racists to repent, since they are victims. They simply caught a flu, and your condemnation of a racist is akin to condemning someone with cancer, right? No. Of course you have a double standard here. Only sins which you deem acceptable are diseases.

You've missed the point, Hank.