Search results

Hebrews 2:6-9 (NLT) For in one place the Scriptures say, 'What are mere mortals that you should think about them, or a son of man that you should care for him? Yet you made them only a little lower than the angels and crowned them with glory and honor. You gave them authority over all things.'...

Y-1, what I said above still stands. Leave the world of fiction behind.

Still no citations of any texts. Do you even have a conscience?

I have asked you scores of times to back up what you are charging the NIV with. I should be demanding you by this late date. You're cowardly. You need to simply produce NIV texts that prove any of your allegations are true. You have always avoided doing so because you know that you have no truth...

Churches are composed of Christians for the most part. What you are addressing are non-Christian groups that call their gatherings churches. The 'agenda' you made mention of has to evidence itself in the text of translations. You won't find what you constantly want to believe. You're just...

You're beating a dead horse. Aside from the NKJV, all of the modern English versions of the last thirty years have some measure of inclusive language. That is, the top twenty or so. Are you getting ready to spout off some cursed misinformation about the new NASB too? As if you haven't caused...

I'm speaking of you --don't foist the blame on anyone else.

Zoom! Over your head once again.

You very well know the specific allegations you have made against the NIV. I have listed them over and over again so that you would finally feel some sense of shame for saying such scurrilous things. It all boils down to what is in the text. None of your accusations are found in the text of the...

This reminds me of the false accusations against President Trump in the so impeachment process. All sorts of absurd accusations have been made against him with his phone call. President Trump has repeatedly held up the transcript. Nothing else matters. This is what was actually said. Simply read...

The above was a typo. I meant to say : Anyone can have legitimate objections to the way some passages are presented. They can argue for what they believe to be a better rendering. But it stops there. Anyone saying outlandishly false things as Y-1 has done for 15 years is going beyond the pale...

Among other things, you have an avoidance disorder. Take my prior post to heart.

On key word searches for both the NIV and CSB, I found the following: Ancestor NIV : 9 CSB : 175 Men NIV : 1080 CSB : 1059 Person NIV : 324 CSB : 580 Father NIV : 313 CSB : 421 Fathers NIV 49 CSB : 265 People NIV : 2717 CSB : 2260 So it's split down the middle. But not 50/50. In 443 cases...

I had only guessed about that amount. On key word searches such as : ancestors father fathers men people person The NLT uses 38.75% more inclusive language than the NIV based on those six key words alone. Of course a more comprehensive search would yield more info and the percentage would change.

I only checked for "holy people." NABRE : 84 CEB : 32 NRSV : 31 CSB : 20 LEB and NET : 19 ISV : 17 NIV : 12

Your false statements cannot be supported by any passage in the text of the NIV. Stop your myths and turn to the truth. Your constant drumbeat of false allegations against a fine Bible translation has got to stop. If this were a court of law you'd be up the creek without a paddle. Peddle your...

It was denounced years before it was released. A lot of folks were yammering about it without knowledge, including World Magazine -- a Christian tabloid. The sinfulness was on a grand scale. Hypocrisy was running rampant --still is. In its pages since the 20teens it has run ads for other Bible...

Well chalk up another falsehood for Y-1. To go against the 2011 NIV an that I object to anyone saying they don't think some passages were properly. You know that. I object to irresponsible remarks made by you over a 15 period regarding the NIV. You attribute things to it that are entirely...

The word 'so' as you are using it means consequently. But the subject you are bringing up has nothing to do with anything I was speaking about.

Many times you have treated the 1984 NIV with respect to inclusive language as a kind of Red Line that should not be crossed. But once I gave a number of examples, maybe 20 or more in which the ESV used more inclusive language than the 1984 NIV. You were fine with it. You didn't object, and...