Search results

He's a 7th Day Adventist. Similar to Jehovah's Witnesses, but everything that he is using in this thread to prove Michael is Jesus is exactly the same arguments used by 7DA's, all the same proof texts and arguments. He's trying to get you to go to Joshua 5 because that is one of the proof...

Why do you keep skipping this!

This is not true. "Arch" means leader or chief in Greek. In Daniel 10:13 it says Michael was ONE OF the chief princes. Now go back and answer all the other verses I gave you that prove Jesus is not and could not be Michael.

Is this a serious question? "Qeneh" has always been a reed. There is an entirely different Hebrew word for what you are talking about. This isn't the word for cannibas, weed, or marijuana. The reeds were made into smelling oils that anointed priests, not for smoking it. Read verse 25 of the...

Just to ensure that HW does't run away from the Scriptures on this, and so he has no excuse not to repent of this blasphemous belief, I'm going to keep these verses in front of him until he answers it.

Even the Calvinists on here have disagreed with you about Michael. I can't speak for their salvation, I am speaking of YOURS. I don't care if it's a Calvinist, a Baptist, a Baptiscostal, a Pentamatic, or Mr Holy pastor of Edible Shoes Baptist Church, if he preaches and believes in some other...

I have many disagreements with Calvinists, KJVO critics, but I draw that line at blatant blasphemy against my Saviour. You have denied virtually every fundamental doctrine of the Bible and now make Jesus into a created being. You are no Christian, but a wolf in sheeps clothing. Jesus said "if...

No you are not. Everything you have said on prophecy, Michael, hell, and now the accusation that the 7th Day Adventist Church frequently uses to claim that Spurgeon taught that Michael was Jesus all show you are either a JW or 7DA. Take your pick but you are certainly no Baptist, and with that...

First of all, Spurgeon was a Calvinist and if you have seen anything of how I feel about Calvinism, I could frankly care less what Spurgeon says. Spurgeon is not my final authority, the Bible is, therefore I could care less what Spurgeon said, it doesn't fit the Bible. But you are either a...

Angels are created beings. Jesus is not a created being unless of course you are taking the JW position of Colossians 1, Rev 3:14 to butcher the text and claim the He was created. Hebrews 1:7 “And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire.”...

These are questions that I've asked him on other threads because I suspected that he is a Jehovah's Witness. He never answered the question about Jesus literally rising from the dead, nor whether Jesus died on a literal cross. He also does not believe in a literal hell either, and notice that...

I had the first 5 books of the OT memorized at age 12 (was a 'traditional' requirement), and currently have the NT memorized-the NT also being a "tradition" currently rejected by my heritage. You apparently know very little about traditional Judaism if you think any Jew that has converted to...

Funny you should ask that! http://dorightchristians.wordpress.com/2013/04/10/wwjd-wdbs-getting-back-to-the-bible/

I wrote my doctoral thesis on Preterism. I can show @ 100 different things that did not occur in AD 70 from Matthew 24,Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Zechariah, Isaiah, Daniel, 2 Thess 2, and all of Revelation that should have happened if Jesus had come back in AD 70. The few statements that I DID give can...

It is also recorded fact that John was not exiled until Rome began to use exile as punishment under Domitian whose reign did not begin until AD 81. The church in Smyrna was in not in existence before AD 70. Smyrna's first bishop was Polycarp who was not even born until AD 69 so unless Polycarp...

So do you believe that Jesus physically rose from the dead, or is that just as symbolic as the Preterist view of Jesus' "spiritual" return to earth in AD 70 even though Revelation 1:7 says that they shall look on him whom they have pierced, and Acts 1:1-6 shows that Jesus will come BACK in the...

In order to show that something is OUT of context, you have to show where it is IN context. Revelation 12 is IN context with a description of a great red dragon in Revelation 12:3. This dragon is said to be the accuser of the brethren, which fits with Zech 3:1 where Satan stood before the Lord...

"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he [SINGULAR]was cast out into the earth, and his [SINGULAR] angels were cast out with him" Revelation 12:9 "In that day the Lord with his sore and great and strong sword shall...

"I can not fathom" and "we think" is part of the problem in accepting the verses given on this issue. That makes reasoning and philosophy the final authority on the matter instead of the Scripture. Regardless of whether you "fathom" it to be true or not, the Scriptures are clear on the matter...

As much as respect as I have for CARM, they are wrong on this. If you applied the "relent" interpretation consistently, you would have sinners being commanded to relent and believe without any necessity to change the mind. It causes salvation to be dependent upon believing with emotionalism and...