Search results

Your wrong again. President Trump didn't zig or zag either one, It was the aged queen that wandered off the path. You're so ideologically blind, you can't even see a video without trying to change what happened. And that is disgusting.

It didn't happen that way at all. I saw the film. The President did not cut in front of her. Period. Whoever said he did is making it up.

He's not even trying very hard. That perpetual smirk on his face told everyone he thinks he's untouchable and too smart to be nailed.

He's very plain spoken, and as a former judge, likely hard for a liar like Strzok to fool.

He's not playing "damage control" at all. That's a phrase coined to make his detractors and all the crazies screaming the sky is falling, feel righteous. Just another left wing media game being played, and written by an obviously biased writer. Not surprised you buy into it. It tells you...

:Roflmao

I'm not quite ready to buy this report, although it wouldn't surprise me if it was accurate.

We also elected a president who spent millions to keep his college transcript secret. Wonder what he's hiding? Could it be he was more the village drug addled idiot than a competent student who continued to get a pass because of his race? Wonder why we elected a guy like that, whose only job...

You can worry about it. I don't give it a thought.

Another response pulled out of thin air. Be that as it may, I'm done here. Just can't seem to convince you that homosexual acts are sinful, both in the old and the new testament and part of the gospel. The good news (gospel) is that those sins can be forgiven. But like all sins, forgiveness...

Another ridiculous response pulled out of thin air. Can't make a point on your own so you have to twist someone else's words for your off the wall response.

He was also lying.:Biggrin

Did anyone ever ask him to explain what he meant?

:Laugh Oh pleas! Stop with the Histrionics. That's really a pitiful response.

None of which is worth a reply. But I will say this: it is evident to me that you want to turn one sin into a non sin to meet your own social agenda. And I can tell you with authority that it won't work and never has.

That's just another well worn excuse not to preach the Bible. It does no good to encourage people to chart a path for heaven if we don't tell them how to get there. They can't do it alone and they can't do it without Christ, who didn't hesitate to state the consequences of sin.

No, you can't turn it around. Because it doesn't "FOCUS" on homosexual sins. Neither does it ignore them. What's happening among some so called Christians is an effort to distort God's word to excuse and legitimize sins they want to commit and will not repent of. It won't work. But it...

If your version of the gospel doesn't cover the consequences of sins such as homosexual acts, what good is it? Mine covers it. Why doesn't yours?

But that is exactly what you have been doing from the get go.. You need to get your story straight.

They really need to stop hanging on this guy's word. What he is proposing is a return to the dark ages, when only the Church knew what the Bible said. And look at the evil that was done in the name of God, and people accepted it because they didn't know any better. I think I'd put this guy on...