Search results

Probably because an autonmous alcoholic wants to be all by himself :)

You can remind me of the context just don't forget the words in them "IF ANY MAN hear my voice" If you'll notice all 7 letters normally stopped and then offered a general statement. Rev 2:7 "if any man hath an ear let him hear what the Spirit sayeth unto the churcheS" Even though the letter...

Wrong country:tonofbricks:

Haha, Rev 3:20 you beat me to it.

Calvinism is a devilish conspiracy to get the Baptists in line with the Roman Catholic church and to control the remaining protestant groups. The Reformation dealt a major blow to the RCC and the RCC needed a quick response to it. The RCC, when it's back is against the wall, has always tolerated...

You really need a new approach to that because every time I demonstrate what it is you simply respond that "you're ignorant". It's so much easier to simply carte blance the ignorance accusation then to actually PROVE the other person doesn't correctly state the positions. Even IF I misstated...

More blah. Again, I gave you details, facts, history, texts, and you still respond with blah. Blah The analogy was not infant. You were asked to prove your election and instead, your proof was a verse that tells you to prove your election. You can't prove your election by pointing to a verse...

That is the only honest answer to the question. When a Calvinist is asked how they prove they're elect, they point to a verse that commands them to prove their election. That's not proving your election, that's proving that you are supposed to prove your election. When asked when you check your...

As I stated before, this is the classic circular reasoning used to prove assurance of salvation. Quoting Peter does not PROVE YOU ARE ELECT, and only proves that a believer is to make their calling and election sure. The verse is a test, not a confirmation. Calvinists are consistently...

If all of the elect WILL preserve, then why are they asked to MAKE their calling and election SURE? Or does God simply MAKE them CHECK their own salvation? 2 Cor 13:5. So since Calvin did not preserve in good works, seeing that he consented to murder (surely that can't be considered the marks...

If all of the elect WILL preserve, then why are they asked to MAKE their calling and election SURE? Or does God simply MAKE them CHECK their own salvation? 2 Cor 13:5. So since Calvin did not preserve in good works, seeing that he consented to murder (surely that can't be considered the marks...

Nope I don't base my theology or dispensationalism on whether some academic scholar agrees or disagrees. The truth of the Bible does not depend on whether 500 people agree with dispensational truth, and 499 do not. If those scholars looked at the issue more carefully, if they have even...

blah, blah, blah. I give you dates, scripts, quotes, texts, contradictions from your own versions, and in return I get blah, blah, blah. blah. "And Samuel said, What meaneth then this bleating of the sheep in mine ears, and the lowing of the oxen which I hear?" 1 Samuel 15:14 Actually, one of...

You highlighted only a partial part of my sentence, and left out the critical point. I didn't say that the book of Hebrews does not apply to the church, or is all future, I said DOCTRINALLY there are large parts of Hebrews that you can not apply to the church age (Hebrews 6 and 10 for example)...

Origen took the texts that DID have the reading out of the A, and attributed it to the Byzantine Family so that it would appear that it was not in the Alexandrian. Yet Origens work was far later then the mss that did contain the reading like the Peshitta in AD 150. So the "best manuscripts"...

And yet the NIV, ESV and almost every other bible translation uses the exact same clause 3 verses later in Romans 8:4 "in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit." ESV (English Standard Version)...

It's funny that the KJVO is accused of not being objective when the material that we get for our rebuttals comes from reading the opposition, something that anti-KJVers admittedly are not willing to do, but yet WE are the ones who are biased.:laugh: