Search results

If the shoe fits....... So do you propose that we interpret the entire Bible symbolically? If not, then that means there are obvious times when exegeting scripture you can tell the difference between the literal, hyberbole, symbolic etc..When John 11:35 says "Jesus wept", that's pretty...

When was the Catholic church ever legitimate? The question "is the Catholic church NOW apostate" is an oxymoron.

According to KY, the Jews are the only ones in history that ever had reprobates in their culture or religion. Forget that whatever heathen practices they learned, they learned from EGYPT and BABYLON (which transferred to Medo Persion, then to Greece, then to Rome which translated to the rest of...

Many historians interpret Hitler as being Christian because the majority of the world think Catholics are Christian. Hitler was a die-hard Roman Catholic. He was trained in Austria under a Jesuit Priest and signed a concordat with Pope Pius XII in 1933 for mutual assistance during WW2. Hitler's...

Problems I have with rejecting Original Sin: 1. Effects of Sin. Sin is the reason that humans now experience pain, suffering, hunger. Eating protein is now required because as the body dies, it need replenish of nutrients to prolong the inevitable-death. Would any deny that a child is...

You can tell Jesus at judgment day that His personal return to the earth, the gathering of His church is not a fundamental doctrine. You can tell Jesus that Calvin baptizing infants for salvation is not a fundamental heresy. It is easy to see that since Calvin was off on grace and salvation...

So CALVINism is not based on John Calvin? Gotcha And yes, I say he was an unsaved heretic because he wholeheartedly believed that murder was a legitimate form of discipline for violating not only OT laws, but even local Geneva ordinances. "Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye...

That certainly doesn't help your argument that John Calvin never used the TR! Furthermore, the author shows certainty that Calvin used the Beza and Erasmus Texts, but says "probably" when it came to de Colines. And if you note in the comment I responded that it wasn't just Calvin but also all...

You have not proven otherwise and you have certainly not proven that John Calvin didn't BELIEVE that the death penalty for heresy was OK. Show me any of your revisionist history quotes where John Calvin didn't BELIEVE that it was OK to murder heretics! Translating a script from one language to...

That's not an asinine statement considering that amillennialism is a heretical doctrine that denies the scriptures, and denies the covenant that God promised to Israel, and ignores the plain teaching of Revelation 20:4. It is a ROMAN CATHOLIC doctrine.

. Regardless of the influence that the RCC had on Calvin, Calvinist's claim that God's sovereignty imposed grace on them that could not be resisted based on their being elected. I find it difficult to believe that God would put so much emphasis on imposing salvation, but not change their...

So in other words, there's no difference between the Old and New Testaments. In other words, we are still under the law. In other words, the church lives by the Davadic Covenant. In other words, there's no coming tribulation, no antichrist, no second coming of Christ, and no millennium and no...

Isn't saying for a fact that there is no millennium a presupposed conclusion?

And don't forget about John Piper's "Christian Hedonism". Piper "Christianized" Hedonism like John Calvinized Augustianism. Apple never falls far from the tree. It's not a big surprise that a murdering, baby sprinkling reprobate produced a false gospel, and a view on prophecy all the popes are...

What a smudge on Paul's character. Paul never consented to nor murdered anyone after his salvation, he didn't sprinkle babies, and his eschatology was far different than Calvin's non-eschatology. Calvin wouldn't know a prophetical passage if it bit his ear off-probably the reason he never wrote...

I will comment more on this later because it is almost 6 am here and I have gotten my schedule out of whack! You do not have to actually kill someone to be Biblically guilty of murder. " Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him."...

The Spirit of God is eternally existent, so of course He was there; that wasn't the argument. The Holy Spirit indwelling and working in man was not the same in the OT as it is in the NT, the scriptures I cited make that clear. And Hebrews 13:8 shows that God's nature never changes, not that...

You still have no clue what a straw-man argument is even after I tried to explain it to you. And yet you claim to know everything that Calvin did NOT teach while admitting you have never read him. All of your presuppositions have been based on Calvinist (John Calvin if you don't know what...

Even if all John Calvin did was merely BELIEVED that the death penalty was appropriate for heresy and all other sins against the law, he is still a heretic. So did John Calvin BELIEVE in murder for heresy and sins against the law? From HIS OWN COMMENTARY, YES! This is just ONE example of TONS...

Even if all John Calvin did was merely BELIEVED that the death penalty was appropriate for heresy and all other sins against the law, he is still a heretic. So did John Calvin BELIEVE in murder for heresy and sins against the law? From HIS OWN COMMENTARY, YES! This is just ONE example of...