Search results

Man, after rereading my post I got ahead of myself and didn't finish explaining Mark 14:12. You are reading "and the first day of unleavened bread" as the act taking place being after sunset when that day actually began. The days began at sunset and when Mark said that he didn't mean it was...

Now here's the problem as I see it. No one knows for sure the High Day Sabbeth fell on Friday as tradition says. They simply don't know for sure. Did it fall on Thur., Fri., or Sat.,? We don't know for sure. If we knew for sure then we could come to a conclusion.

LOL, I didn't want to get into this, but let's work it out now that you won't let it go. Mark 14:12 "And the first day of unleavened bread, when they killed the passover, his disciples said unto him, Where wilt thou that we go and prepare that thou mayest eat the passover?" The 14th was the...

The bottom line for me cutting through all the arguing is that Christ said He would be in the tomb for 3 day and 3 nights. Why would He say that if He wasn't in the tomb for 3 full days and 3 full nights? The only timeline that can possibly fit is a Wed. crucifixion. That's what I'm going with...

It makes no difference which day you believe Christ died there is an apparent problem with it in Scripture. There were 2 Sabbaths that week and we don't know exactly how they dealt with it.

We know it wasn't Thur., He couldn't have risen after 3 days and Mary Magdalene have found Him Sun. morning. He would have still been in the tomb.

That's for sure! I'm sure of Wed, but not that sure.

It had to be Wed. there is no other possibility.

To clarify "the after 3 days" remember around the 5 min. mark in the video the gentleman was proving that "after 3 days" is the same as "on the 3rd day? So he confirmed Christ rose from the dead "after 3 days." That is not possible with a Thur. crucifixion. As I said, that would place Christ...

That leaves us with Wed. fulfilling everything except the the disciples who said "this is the 3rd day.

Plus the "the after 3 days" resurection is not possible with a thurs. crucifixion. That would place the "3rd day" on Sun. at sunset, when Mary Magdalene found Him on Sun. morning.

There is only 2 explanations for a Thurs. crucifixion. Back to back Sabbaths or the High Sabbath replacing the weekly Sabbath. There is no mention in Scripture of either happening.

I would like to hear what he doesn't mention. Where does the Sabbath day of Unleavened Bread fit in his theory?

The case for a Thur. crucifixion is back to back Sabbaths. Thurs being the preparation day, the day of the crucifixion, and then a High Day Sabbath followed by the weekly Sabbath Sat. I think this very unlikely.

I've heard some explanations for this but none of them made sense to me. Many see it as a Thur. crucifixion, but that doesn't fit the High Day Sabbath. So I guess it's another "repent and be baptized" thing, pick your poison.

I was told the 7 High Day Sabbaths are High Days because all of them require a sacrifice that represented Christ in some way. In Lev. 23:7 The First Day of Unleavened Bread it is called a " holy convocation" meaning a special gathering together of Israel, or a High Day.

I agree it's the 14th. On a Wed. crucifixion it would have been Thur. Fri. Sat. 3 days. It was Sunday morning when He met the "two of them" so I wonder were they counting Sunday?

We have the same understanding on some things, the KJV, and now this. No telling what's next, lol.

I guess tradition says Fri. but that's not counting for the first day of Unleavened Bread being a Sabbath day of rest.

I've never really paid attention to the exact date of His death. Do the dates work out for a Wed. or Thur. death?