Search results

Those who have ears, let them hear and learn. Jerry Walls completely destroys "Calvinistic Soteriology", which is unbiblical.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses, in their booklet, “Should You Believe in the Trinity”, have on pages 24-25, a very small article under the heading, “Making Himself Equal to God”. Where they refer to John 5:18 and 10:31-36), "But who said that Jesus was making himself equal to God? Not Jesus. He...

We further read in John's Gospel, where Jesus says, "For as the Father raises the dead and gives life to them, even so the Son gives life to whom He will" (5:21) "as" is the Greek "hosper", which has the meaning, "like as, even as", "in like manner", as the Father "gives life", "even so" (Gk...

"My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: and I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, and no one shall snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who hath given them unto me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand. I...

No, you are right, the greatest sin is the rejection of Jesus Christ. here are Christ's own words: "Nevertheless, I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you. But if I go, I will send him to you. And when he comes, he...

you said, "I believe one can be a Christian without believing the doctrine of the Trinity." This is not possible as I have said earlier

If a person is a born again believer, and is asked if they believed in the Holy Trinity, it is a different matter if they said they did not understand it, and needed clarification. But, after they were shown it to be in the Bible, and they still said they did not believe it, not reject it, then...

Not possible

John, Doctrines like, "sacrament, a denial of eternal divine punishment, infant baptism", are what are known as "secondary", and not "essential" to our salvation. NO ONE can ever be a truly born again person, who denies the Virgin Birth of the Lord Jesus Christ. Stanley says very clearly, that...

You don't get what I am saying? What we know about God, the Trinity, Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, etc, and everything about our salvation, is found in the Holy Bible. If there were errors in the Bible, then who is to say that accounts about these Important issues are not also part of those...

maybe you should quit defending Stanley for the sake of it, or from some unknown loyalty, and hear and see what he ACTUALLY has said. These quotes are from the two video clips on the other thread: "The foundation of our faith is not the Scriptures, the foundation of our faith is not the...

I would say that in all probability, that at least 98% of versions of the English Bible's are in agreement. There are some textual variations, but not many that are major, though there are some, like 1 Timothy 3:16, where "θεὸς" is the correct reading, and is very important for the Deity of...

What we know about the Jesus Who saves us, is ONLY found in the Holy Bible. If the accounts about Him are "with error", then how can we believe what its says? There can be no real Jesus Christ, apart from what the Scriptures say about Him. You cannot separate the two.

Its not about going on the attack, but standing up for Bible Truth against those who distort and undermine its "Foundation" by making false claims about what it says. It makes no difference whether the person is a John Doe, or the greatest pastor or scholar!

No it does not. The whole question of inerrancy is of the original autographs as written by the actual writers of the Books of the Bible. There is no way that any "translation" can claim this, as there are parts to each "version" of the Bible, that are not part of the original. Lets take a...

No one here is saying that we witness to the lost by calling them names! There is a huge difference between a lost person, who knows nothing of the Truth of the Bible, and a so-called "pastor" of one of the biggest churches in the world, who mocks Adam and Eve and questions the Truth of the...

I can't see how Stanley can say that he holds to inerrancy of the Bible, when He casts doubts on the Adam and Eve account, says that it is not important whether the Virgin Birth as recorded in the Gospels is true, or not. Inerrancy means basically, that the Bible "is without error or fault in...

Yes, it does not mean any version in any language, as these do contain errors, like copyist, transmission, omission (both accidental and deliberate), etc. No version can claim to be the Word of God, not even the LXX.

I remember some 25 years ago, I was discussing the Inspiration of the Bible with my senior manager, who was a born-again Christian. He said that he did not hold to the entire Bible being the Inspired Word of God. After much discussion that was going nowhere, I decided to write to him. I asked...

sadly that is true...they shall not be condemned for this, as their salvation is based on their faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.