Search results

An oldie but goodie! It's even more humorous as a joke when you realize that it's true!:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

Welcome to the world of liberal perversion!

And IMNSHO, this is giving them a very strong dose of " benefit of the doubt"!

Indeed!!!! :applause::confused::rolleyes::eek:

Touché!!!!

Thank you!!!! This is one of a very few voices I have heard (seen??) that expresses my feelings concerning praying for the infirm. I have always been uncomfortable praying in public (SS etc.) because I have purposely avoided praying for healing per se'; quite the opposite of most. My son...

AMEN!!! Awful lot of this does go on, unfortunately!

Not a very Christian attitude I agree, BUT, I have experienced these same feelings!! :mad::mad::mad:

As of now, yes, but what of tomorrow? 10-15 years ago the problem of queers marrying(?) was a non-existent problem also. And bakers, photographers etc had no problem refusing to cater to certain customers, but all that has drastically changed. Remember the ole "slippery slope"!:BangHead:

Hopefully, with men like Tim Scott, interviewed on Fox News, repudiating the establishment (read demoncrats) approach to blacks, there may come a backlash against the politically enforced "slavery" of the modern blacks. If/when that happens, the demoncrats may as well all move to Cali and...

Perhaps, perhaps not. I certainly hope that a possible (certain?) veto does not become the criteria for the legislature to decide what bills to send for the POTUS signature. If that is the case, a fantastic election has just self-destructed.

Or at least accused of -?-?-?-, with no time to refute before the election!

BINGO!!!! And I take it that you don't see a legal demand such as this as getting ON the slope????? All the instances mentioned in my post earlier just got us ON the slope! and you see where we are with those now. This is nothing more than test of the water to see which actions will sink...

Surely you are not this naive! Remember when abortion was "only for the safety of the mother", or "homos just wanted to be legally protected from persecution", or "social security will never be used for anything but retirement funding"????? IOW the old "slippery slope theory" - been proven...

I never cease to be amazed at the depths liberals will go to try to skew an argument just to condemn a conservative. HAVE YOU STOPPED BEATING YOUR WIFE? They will ask this type of question and actually expect you to give a YES or NO answer ONLY, and then take whichever you give and formulate...

I think you mean "Who is their god?", and I think that is very evident, even though they would self-righteously deny it!!

Just assume that she has picked up the virus. How long before (typical average) the virus would begin to be evident in her body???? IOW, if, on day 1 she picked up the virus, would she begin to show symptoms on day 2, 5, 10, 20, or when??? Or is this period even known?? As for her...

Considering how it's been handled, I presume this is a rhetorical question!!!! Well, RACE, maybe, maybe not; but unquestionably POLITICAL!!!!!

:tongue3::smilewinkgrin::thumbsup:

Boy have you goofed!!!! This fact is supposed to apply ONLY when it is of benefit to blacks; at least according to some of our liberal brethren!! :smilewinkgrin: