Search results

Of course there are. There are also "self-styled Christians" who oppose the media's use of such events to further political agendas. Do you join with them in opposing that?

Definition, please. Not your own, but from a credible dictionary.

Really? "Terrorists"? What should they do? Make *ALL* guns illegal?

Not true. As I pointed out, I addressed your very first point in your first post -- that faith is work. Because the rest of your points depend upon this understanding, this is the point that matters most. To that end, I posted the first problem with your post: that you are re-defining faith to...

How do we prove to you that we understand the points you made?

On January 25, 2013 it was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution And Civil Justice. Hasn't been heard or discussed since.

http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/7322690 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2812947/Are-Britain-s-thickest-thieves-Armed-robbers-masks-gaze-CCTV-cameras.html http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/7041636...

If I avoided something, please tell me what it was, and I'll address it. In the meantime, I've addressed the very first point in your opening post. Either answer that, or admit that you're wrong.

Moderators - it's obvious this individual does NOT want to participate in discussion, but only wishes to continue printing his writings that cavinists and non-calvinists both have pointed out as error-filled. Why do you allow it to continue?

Yes. ........

SBM - are you going to respond to me?

You aren't going back and forth. You made an opening statement; I provided an opposing point refuting your statement. At this time, you haven't written *anything* that explains why my opposing point is wrong. You simply keep asking what your point was; I tell you; then you ask what your point...

I explained that in both the posts. What do you not understand about my explanation of your first point, and why it is wrong? I have an additional question that may help: is English your first language, or is it your second (or even third, or more)?

See posts 17 and 31.

So what do you mean by "deceived or intentionally doing"?

What exactly are they intentionally doing?

How is this evasion? I addressed your very first point. YOU are the one that won't debate what I've written about your very first point, so YOU are the one who is evading. Be always ready to give an answer, as scripture says. If you won't discuss what we find problematic with your posts, then...

As I explained in post #17, your first point was that faith is a work; and then you defined work while omitting the definition of faith. You "forced" faith to adopt the definition of work. Then you used Acts 16:30 to support your point, while ignoring context of the jailer's question and Paul's...

Please review post #17.

Okay, let me try this again: you made an opening statement containing multiple points. I countered with an opposition of your first point. Now you're supposed to discuss why my opposing point is incorrect.