Search results

Behaving crappily towards aliens and children. You know what it means

So, um, not very good news for them then! Singleness here for eternity in the hereafter...

I think I've made my point about it in so far as it relates to this thread.

For the record, this is pretty much ad idem with my own position to SSM and abortion: Jacob Rees-Mogg 'completely opposed' to abortion - Jacob Rees-Mogg 'completely opposed' to abortion - BBC News For info, this man could although it is unlikely become Prime Minister.

I thought you were the one who didn't want to talk about it here...directing me to another thread.

I've said all I want to say on DACA and I stand by what I've said above. If we're not prepared to be an authentic prophetic voice as Christians, then we're not following our Lord and Saviour.

I can do little better than go to God's Word: Ezekiel 16:49 "'Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. As I have already said, there are more important things for the Church to be worried about...

The sin of Sodom was refusing hospitality ...like repealing DACA

Discussion document only and in no way changes Catholic doctrine. Hence the joke "Bears in wood mourn death of fellow-cliché as theologians doubt whether Pope is Catholic."

I said 'anyone else'.

So did you just decide to find women attractive?

And when exactly did you choose to be heterosexual?

Compared to the harm caused by the Church's track record of bigotry and homophobia? How many suicides have gay people occasioned?

The Church needs to be consistent. That at least can be said about the Catholic and Orthodox Churches who have upheld their standards of marriage steadfastly and only recognise sacramental marriage, as defined by them. Protestants have not been so consistent: only a couple of generations ago...

Agreed: always 100% human and 100% God

To an extent, the histories are indeed different. In Britain the debate has been more characterised by the 'redefinition' point: here we have moved over the centuries from married women being goods and chattels through married women being able to own property (1880s) from marriage not existing...

Two Natures in one Person. That's always been the orthodox position.

Christ as pertains to His humanity not as pertains to His divinity

I don't see though how any of that though changes the previous changes to marriage; you'd have more of a point if the same baker had been prosecuted for refusing to bake a cake for a remarriage of a divorces couple but the cases you cite come across as "some redefinition of marriage are more...

No, I don't get it: explain in what way SSM is a threat to heterosexual marriage.