Search results

Because it was introduced as a religious expression rather than a simple dress code.

SBM - I have only one of your points to debate. You keep mixing "the world" with the group of believers. In what you're trying to say, we would read 2 Cor 5:19 as He reconciled His believers to Him; and this point cannot be argued. But you confuse the issue by referring to "this world," thus...

The fact that he asked "how did this happen" (how did he run out of ammo) leads me to agree with Rolf. I'm thinking he didn't input the proper sequence for the "unlimited ammo" mode.... <facetiousness tag, for those that don't get it>

They've always had non-Christians apply--and be accepted. I did my master's online with LU; they are accredited and accepted by the military. Had to go to the campus for one week for my final capstone course; I was surprised to find that only a few of my fellow classmates approached anything...

When your cousin gets back, he/she will understand the joke better, too. And yes, I have problems with people understanding my "military humor."

Maybe so; I'd like to say that we find ourselves in another "we have to pass it to see what's in it" type situation...except this time, there's no real voting, and it's going to be forced upon us until someone legally challenges it, or Congress enacts something on their own....

Don't forget, using a thorn when your needle wore out....

Okay, folks; I'm gonna have to walk back my position a bit. While I support the basic tenets of actual net neutrality, and the way the current FCC chairman phrased his announcement a couple of weeks ago ... I'm deeply concerned that they're not allowing the public to see the 332 page proposal...

And yet, "I and my father are one"....

"Lots." "Few." "Most." Those are invalid qualifiers that beg the question. In order for them to be true, everyone has to agree with each of them. Until you can actually provide numbers that support "lots," "few," and "most," then all they are is conjecture -- not fact. In fact, I've never...

You were given some details about a disagreement with your premise; instead of debating those details, you went a completely different way and dismissed the one who disagreed with you. You then posted a link to someone else's work. You never actually provided a debate or discussion with the...

John, The link you posted; that author is wrong for the following reasons: 20 different translations of Prov 11:30; 18 of them identify the conjunction as "and," which is inclusive (directly contradicting your author who states the verse is a contrast). 1 of them doesn't use a conjunction...

Wasn't that pretty much all you had to say? (understand what I'm trying to tell you?)

Looked at your link; he's wrong.

John - Rev didn't mention cal vs. arm. He posted a verse that directly contradicted what you said; when you responded by saying the translation was incorrect, he then showed you that the translation you used was basically the same ("winneth" vice "captures"). Then YOU brought up cal vs. arm. You...

And it'll get vetoed by Obama, and sent back to see if they can overturn the veto....

Is there a point to this?

Does this follow the same/similar logic? All unicorns are horse-like creatures - True. Therefore, some horse-like creatures are unicorns - False (unicorns aren't real).

Was wondering, since throughout this thread it's been referred to as "chic"....

I'm confused: are we talking about chic (stylish) tracts, or Chick (Jack Chick) tracts?