Search results

I just want to know with out preconceived information, Where you get the antichrist, A one man ruler, that rules in a third temple, and makes peace in the middle east with a literal interpretation of the bible. A prophecy of 490 years needs a 2000 and counting year gap to make that work. The he...

Where in that post did I say we should throw out futurism because of Hal Lindsey's UFO blunder?

So you honestly believe Jesus is going to ride down here and Stand on the mount of Olives and Spilt it in two? Revelations 13 And I saw a beast coming out of the sea with ten crowns on its horns, and on each head a blasphemous name. Literally thats not a man so how is it the antichrist...

Robycop3 did you read Hal Lindsey's book countdown to Armageddon? When is that ufo going to land and demons come out saying they created man? You can't make this stuff up. It's laughable. Your literalism is flawed. You have a preconceived theology dictating what is literal and what's not.

I realize it doesn't matter that much. But being 27 and a hammered in futurist my whole life from everyone I know. And then finding out everything you learned has more than one side is quite interesting. It's like a bird leaving the nest. It's a whole new world.

I don't agree with throwing anything 2000 years into the future just because you can't explain it fully. This chapter is fulfilled in my opinion.

I am not denying, the Pre Mill Amill positions, Im saying the Future one world Government, antichrist, 7 year tribulation, was not taught in early church history. Thats what I want to see in a early writing before the Catholic Doctrine. Daniels 70 weeks, find an EARLY commentary that throws a...

I wasn't doing that, I wanted him to see it. and post, but he can't because he listed as non baptist. He is a former Futurist as well, so I thought that would be very interesting.

No truer words have ever been spoken. Im currently listening to some commentaries on Zech right now. Most Futurist commentaries are splitting Chapter 13 verse 7 and taking the last sentence "and I will turn my hand against the little ones" and making that the divide between past and future...

Explain this generation to me. And show me one more example in Matthew where it speaks of a future generation. Mr literal.

What does that have to do with a modern day antichrist and that part of futurism?

well with all that knowledge, you should be able to refute him easily right? I didn't send anyone after you to debate you. I asked him to read the posts yes. I don't even know him other then a few PMs ,he is an adult, he made his own choice about PMing you. I wasn't here to debate, I was here...

Matt 24:29-31 -- Christ speaks of the end signs. This passage hinges upon the apocalyptic language of the great prophets Isaiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, David, etc. in exactly the same way they used such language for God's judgments against nations and individuals in their own times. Compare Christ's...

The tone I'm getting from the futurists on this board, (not all) is that if you don't agree you are dabbling in the occult.

So much for coming here to actually learn, those with lower education (degree wise) on subject matters, must not be allowed in Gods kingdom anymore...

Paul is coming as well?

Link the beast with man of sin first.

Wow that's a different view of the he. Interesting... I believe historicist believes it is the Roman empire under the Caesers? And futurists Believe it's the HS at the rapture.

2nd peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as unexpectedly as a thief. Then the heavens will pass away with a terrible noise, and the very elements themselves will disappear in fire, and the earth and everything on it will be found to deserve judgment. So would this be talking about...

1st Corinthians 15: 56 For sin is the sting that results in death, and the law gives sin its power. 57 But thank God! He gives us victory over sin and death through our Lord Jesus Christ. Yes but he can't not prevail!