Search results

Need to eliminate crossover voting before any plan will be very productive. 'Course this is a legal function of the state, but it's a fly on top of the ice cream if not addressed. I'm convinced that cross-party voting is what got the last R candidate on the ballot - certainly not mass appeal...

As much as I agree with you, the emphasized portion says that if this clause were truly enforced, no liberal (be it Rep., Dem., or Ind.) would ever complete his/her term in office, much less have a career in gov't.

Johnv sez: Bolded mine Have to disagree on this point; at least if what I've been led to understand about Eastern - near AND far - culture is true. Specifically that there is a pecking order, and you had better observe it or else - "FACE" is everything! Same problem with orientals. This is...

Bolded mine Methinks that this is a no-brainer for this administration - IMHO, this is exactly the desired result. Further erosion of classified data and/or more embarrassment for the USA so the "0" can apologize to the world (read Islamics) one more time for the short-comings of America...

As Gomer would say--"SHAZAM!!"

While the details were not this obvious, I personally believe that any discerning observer could have forecast that something akin to this mockery of justice was inevitable, simply by looking at the "0"'s compadres PRIOR to his attaining the highest office in this once proud and sensible...

Based on the possibility here, all the "loyal"(?) opposition would have to do is flood the precincts with all manner of votes for their candidate and elicit a concession from the other. If then, the "fraud" was discovered, what would then be the result? 1) nullify the results and create a...

And the worst part is that so many on this board will refuse to dis-own him as their keeper, savior, messiah, sugar-daddy, great political physician, etc. ---- in spite of any revelations that besmirch his "sterling(??)" character! I guess it's just that old "head-in-the-sand" syndrome, so they...

Yep!! But as long as he can get input from his "sponsors" before he has to respond, he can fake it very well!!:sleep: I have a sneaking suspicion that was the reason for his delay in responding to the Ft Hood incident - other than "Let's not jump to conclusions", that is.

As another old geezer, I agree with Tom on this; trying to get cutesy/relevant name (to moderns) would be a turn-off to me. Also, the name "Watchtower" raised the JW connotation immediately to me - don't know how prevalent that would be though.

This reminds me of a quip I read once about a US Patent Office employee who, in pre-1900, resigned to seek other employment. Why?? He believed that everything that COULD be invented, HAD been invented, so his job would soon be eliminated. Now this is questionable to me whether it is to be taken...

Folks, you are seeing PCism at it's finest! If the liberals succeed in squashing the Muslim infection in this case, look for more of the same down the road. LIBERALISM IS A FATAL DISEASE!!!!

Hey, he's smarter than I tho't!!:laugh::laugh:

Whatcha mean "NO EDUCATION"????? HE GRADUATED FROM THE 2ND GRADE!!!!!:tongue3::thumbs:

Wonder if the accusing party will acknowledge this fact!!???:smilewinkgrin:

This will never fly with the "head-in-the-sand" crowd, true though it may be!!

I got your point on the "double standard" first time around Marcia. I think it was very clear to anyone who wasn't just looking for something to complain about - of which there is an abundance on this board!!!!:sleep:

It's highly doubtful that those who haven't had their eyes opened by now will ever see the light until that proverbial "knock" comes to their door in the middle of the night. They may think they're immune now, but once their usefullness has evaporated, well---!:tear:

bolded mine And you, my friend, are showing your ignorance and/or naivety by this bolded quote from you. You likewise have no evidence that this is fact in every state, save for your Pollyannaish attitude. So don't get so snippy with your holier-than-thou approach.

Matt sez: Boy, that's harsh!! I sure hope you aren't married; but if you are and the two of you don't have some differences more serious than this , then one of you is un-necessary!:tongue3: