Search results

Yes, you said rightly, that you were "Led by the Spirit". The bible is clear that we can be led "By the Spirit", "Into temptation" (The unread say "No"). Yes, Jesus say "Lead us NOT into temptation", is that the opposite of what happened to Him "He was lead by the Spirit INTO TEMPTATION". I'm...

What? Why don't you study the bible for a year then ask re-think your question. I got criticized for saying that people here, for the most part, have no clue, this buttress my argument. Why would anyone respond? Since everything is created and held together by God Acts 17:34, how can He...

Why do you write what the bible says? You may confuse our traditions? Iconoclast, I suspect you may [EDIT - personal attacks are not allowed] please stop giving us the truth, we are content in our ignorance. [EDIT - you are not allowed to impersonate a moderator. If you have a problem with a...

They are walls that no one can overcome. Arms try to say that it's nations in Romans 9 when clearly in the Greek it's personal noun, and even if it was nations it still shows partiality. No Arminian has done a good job, something I'd think you'd know. Look, I'm quitting this forum, this is...

What does the bible say? "Bring my sons and daughter from afar who I have made for my glory. Everything God does is for His Glory, and I don't think there's a mainstream denomination that would disagree with that. I'm a bit suprised about the answers here. I love what Jonathan Edwards...

Yea, after the reformation from the synergistic Roman Church, we got back quick to the truth of scripture, but sadly it has slowly but surely come back. With the information age people can now see, and watch, and study both sides of the debate, and find that the bible teaches monogesim...

Compelling statement, why don't you back it up with scripture? Can you? Synergism, what you believe, in no different in substance than than Roman Church, JW, Molinism, Islam, or Mormonism, for synergism is all about man as the final arbitor of what will happen. Only true Reformed Theology...

Calv1: Who says them come regardless, you? God ordains not just the ends, but the means.

Yea, Romans 5 is clear, as are the other verses that we are sinners from the womb. You have a good week too.

"I was conceived in sin" "They sin from the womb, telling lies" You are born spiritually dead and unable to please God. You are born a "Slave to sin". You can't possibly be saying you were righteous from the womb, ready for Heaven, then when you grew you became a sinner? If so, abortion...

Try again. You were doing alright with your definition of wrath, then made a generalized statement that God doesn't hate "Willy-Nilly"? It's very simple, those who do not believe, which is most of the world, the WRATH of God abides in them, period! You might want to read up on Annanias and...

And..........

Calv1: I'm through with this, this is not debate, it's nit picking and trying to find fault. Just because there are differences doesn't mean there is tension, you should be careful with your words. My great friend and I agree on almost everything, but he's a hardcore dispensationlist, I'm CT...

Aside from your attackers lack of logic, has this person ever read Romans 9, John 6, Ephesians 1, and if so why doesn't he believe it? The bible is clear all the way through, but those three passages are brick walls no man can break through. I mean in Romans 9 Paul actually gives a defense...

Good night.

Calv1: There is no internal tension, but rather a revival. People are in this information age going back to the truth.

I just re-read the post, it is pretty vague, seems you are asking if God is the author of sin, or where did sin come from, is this right?

Debate you? Are you joking???? Oh, I see you are...I will destroy, sorry I mean debate you any day of the week:tongue3: You lost me on your topic, you start at one point and now we are way over talking about pride. I was going to go to sleep, let me re-read this and answer you.

Calvin made many mistakes, and no one writer has everything 100% correct all of the time. I am not a hyper-Calvinist, I reject that, and you shouldn't suggest it. If you really understood Calvinism you'd never ask me that. I am in good company however, AW Pink, BB Warfield, Jonathan...

Thanks for that, but I disagree with MacArthur strongly in this regard. He has no scriptural support for his position, it seems a watered down message to make something he wishes to believe. We have to ask "What is love". Is not love seeking the good of the other? Does God seek the good of...