Search results

LOL, I hope he was joking! But something tells me he wasn't.

LOL, anyone who places Roman emperors as the 5 fallen kings in Rev. 17 definitely believes Rev. is fulfilled.

I have nothing to say to anyone who believes Revelation is already fulfilled.

Good, he can address it.

OK

No.

What did the Lord say to Daniel when he asked a question that was not intended for him to know at that time? He told him to go stand in his lot and rest till the end, knowledge will increase. That's what's happening not only with Dispensationalism, the time is drawing near and the knowledge is...

Yes, I can say with you saying it's already fulfilled and me saying it is yet to come,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, what's the point?

It's impossible for us to be any further apart in the interpretation of Revelation.

OK

OK

OK

OK

The kings are the leaders of the empires/kingdoms at the time they fell, whoever they were. I told you we won't agree on anything, we are total Biblical opposites.

Maybe in the next life.

I thought the 5 kingdoms that fell were Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Greece. The one that was in John's day was Rome. The one to come is the Federation of Nations/ the ten horns that bring the anti-christ into power. And the 8th of course the anti-christ himself. But what do I know?

Ok, we're worlds apart with a space between another world apart. We will not agree on anything!

Ok, for you it's symbolic.

@SovereignGrace Let me ask you a question assuming you are post-trib. In Rev. 20 John said he seen the souls of them who were beheaded and they refused to take the mark of the beast or worship the beast. And they lived and reigned 1000 years with Christ. John says this is the first...

SG, I think you also know that the Rapture timing cannot be explained from a single passage. It takes a complete overview of all related Scripture to place it together. Why don't you just tell me the problem you see with pre-trib in that context, the overall context.