Search results

Very important to state that none of them held jesus to be the archangel Michael, as held by JW

Actually, wasn';t what we called Reformed/Calvinism more what Beza and Dort defined it as being, not so much Calvin?

Michael was not Jesus

Shoudl also add, IF you hold to can lose salvation, do you agree with Hebrews can never get it back?

So did Jesus have a physical resurrection, and will we?

All calvinists would affirm all 5 points of DOG

Disagree on limiutes atonement, which is the one doctrine of Grace majority disagree with with the "5 pointers"

Think that the english language had changed just between 1611 and 1769 itself that they were hundreds of real text changes , not just spelling and printing issues

Think those who hold to that heresy regrading nature and person of Jesus also tie it into when Jesus returns, with the voice of the arch angel Yes, both John Calvin and John Gill, among other historical Protestant theologians, identified Michael the Archangel as a title for the pre-incarnate...

Jesus created Michael

Jesus is God, and Jesus had a physical resurrection, correct?

The ONLY oral traditions that are valid are the ones in the Bible

In His humanity, he was recoiling at the aspect that when he became the lamb of God upon that cross, he would be facing the Father turning away from Him as the sin bearer

Don't they though state the second Coming was AD 70, and that we shall have a spiritual resurrection at death period now?

And denies that all of us shall be physically resurrected at that time

full blown preterism is heresy

Was Jesus raised back up in same Body was born in? Does he still have his wounds on Him now?

How about our physical resurrection?

Did jesus have a spiritual or physical resurrection, and what type will we have, and is that still a future event yet to come?

I think that they had invited Mark Ward to a discussion regrading KJVO views and the bible