Search results

Here's a better example still and more parallel with the actual Gospel. A woman stands guilty of adultery. She is divorced and sentenced to scourging. The judge steps down from the bench and lays aside his robes, and takes her place in the dock. He confesses her adultery as his own, and...

All men everywhere are commanded to repent. The obedient Israelite was still a penitent Israelite. You're ignoring a host of rites concerning the body of the sacrifice. We don't just take the cup at Lord's table. There's the broken bread too. More on that later. Still, the sacrifice was...

But God was home when the penitent Israelite presented himself before Him. What did God accept, and treat as if it were the Israelite himself? The offering. And what was the treatment of the sin offering? It received the judgment of sin. There's no way around it. PSA is the Gospel, and...

But if you accepted flowers for her, or on her behalf, that means you received them instead of her.

Sin is the transgression. Trespass (or guilt) is the debt of sin. In the sin offering, the sin is judged. In the guilt offering, the sin debt is paid. Right there under our noses in God's picture book.

Then he shall put his hand on the head of the burnt offering, and it will be accepted on his behalf to make atonement for him. - Leviticus 1:4 NKJV You are to lay your hand on the head of the burnt offering, and it will be accepted on your behalf to make atonement for you. - Leviticus 1:4 NIV...

Oh. Sorry. I quoted the wrong post. Lol. I meant to quote Pythagoras, that is, s4c.

Most people will dabble in the occult without demonization, some aren't so fortunate. It's not as cut and dried as you presume.

I don't doubt any of that. In fact, I aver it. That's why we do what we can to help them do the right thing. But that's in the cases of real assault and rape, not in those that feminists are calling such, like the case cited above.

You've just engaged in your own brand of victim blaming. We could say the same for the woman...why were you alone with him? Or, what did you expect going to the bar dressed like that? See how that works?

Sam will be working toward his conclusion that listening to certain types of music will invite demons. Maybe that's true, maybe it's not. I certainly wouldn't recommend anyone going to a Maria Brink concert, and certain kinds of music are characteristic baccahnalian riotousness and paganism and...

Anyway, the treatment of this account is indicative of the political bias applied in the entire report. And this is the sillyness to which we're headed.

Bane of the Virtue Nazis

Here's the full report. I've read it. Let's focus on the details given in the case of the disgraced SBC president Johnny Hunt and "Survivor", the prejudicial psuedonym given to the silly woman who engaged in some misbehavior with him, and what they are calling "assault". It begins on page 149 of...

It's evident that Feminists—male Feminists in this case—also have a tough time with reading comprehension. I clearly said it's a different thing with children. But the vast majority of the cases being alluded to don't involve children...actual children. (We're talking about Baptists, not the LDS...

These are no excuses for not taking it the law.

Lol, I don't think there is a progressive tag you left out of that one. More on that later.

Please. Adultery and fornication isn't abuse. Child sex abuse and rape aren't only abuse, they're crimes. If accusers aren't taking it to law, then it's not a "credible accusation." And I don't buy the "hypnotized by power" or "shocked into submission" silliness, not in the IFB churches, and...

And yet, we are seated with Him in heavenly places. And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus: - Eph 2:6

The trouble with feminists is that they call everything that isn't feminism abuse.