Search results

When do you (in your theological position) say is "the foundation of the church", then?

This is all just 'you' again, in spite of the documentation provided earlier. - WHO IS THE SON OF GOD? - WHO IS THE SON OF GOD? I am not interested in "trinitarian" or "unitarian" in this discussion in regards the texts under discussion. All of that is simply red-herring, and non-sequitur...

Did I question such a thing? No. It is already admitted, granted, accepted. You are simply agreeing with my point. It is not evidence for your point, nor evidence against my point. That is because of the ongoing and continuous doctrine of "preservation", which goes alongside of...

It is obvious, that some tried (hence God's warnings against adding or diminishing from His words (as previously shown - WHO IS THE SON OF GOD? ), following after their father, the devil. It is obvious some forged documents: 2Th_2:2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither...

You seem to only include 'academics' which agree with you (in part), while at the same time, those same 'academics' which you 'cite' (in part), generally agree (certain exceptions of course) that the Son of the Father is eternal Deity (God). Why do you accept them in one place, when it suits...

His 'logic' is, essentially, that if in one place the text says that Christ is a priest: Heb_7:21 (For those priests were made without an oath; but this with an oath by him that said unto him, The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec:) That...

Catholicism stretches a Biblical truth to suit their angel-veneration (worship). Yes, the idea of guardian 'angels' for an individual / peoples exists in scripture. However, while angels are sent to minister to mankind in general, that they might accept the Gospel, a "guarding" angel is...

As I have shown, already, both of those things (catholic dregs) are not anywhere near 4th cent. - WHO IS THE SON OF GOD?

Continued ... Deu_4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you. Deu_8:3 And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest...

You are even confused as to what the "church" is. Act_7:38 This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us: Act 7:38 ουτος εστιν ο γενομενος εν τη εκκλησια εν τη...

You continue to make charges which are proved incorrect by the very linked source I provided. I discuss some of the problems with such, and you seem to have not followed the scriptural command, yet (Pro. 18:13,17), and actually take the time to read it (see pages 171-173, for instance).

Heb_13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.

Continued further ... Merriam Webster’s Dictionary 11th edition Parent - a person who is a father or mother: a person who has a child. Full Definition of PARENT a : one that begets or brings forth offspring b : a person who brings up and cares for another ..." "... Wordsmyth English...

Continued... "... Luke 2:33, 43 “JOSEPH and his mother marvelled” or “HIS FATHER and his mother marveled”? In the true Bible God never refers to Joseph as “the father” of Jesus, and this is simply because when God became a man in the incarnation, the baby Jesus was born of the virgin Mary and...

What a waste of time this is. Nothing but red-herrings, distractions, non-sequiturs from your responses. What you 'accept' is not the foundation of truth. What "Metzger" says is also not the foundation of truth, either. In agreement with KJB: A, E, G, H, K, M, S, U, Y, X, Gamma, Delta...

Yes, there are, in scripture, many such places, as the example you gave (wonderful by the way in its perfect description, scripturally speaking), and such demonstrate the truth of the matter, to those willing to be under subjection to the Holy Ghost / Spirit will accept it / them, but those who...

It is not "Ludicrous" in the least, as I have shown you the evidences, several times. Jesus spoke of false prophets in those two locations, and those two mss are in those exact locations, and in locations which the Bible does not look upon favourably (areas around Egypt and Rome). When did you...

Then, as you have said, B. Metzger, is denying the actual scientific evidence, in favour of his own biases. - WHO IS THE SON OF GOD? - WHO IS THE SON OF GOD? - WHO IS THE SON OF GOD? Again, Metzger, without any evidence, simply says of his own accord, "the earliest and best uncials (Αleph,..."...

Do you know why the NIV does that? It is because it follows several corrupt mss, such as Codex B and Aleph, as my citations and evidences show - WHO IS THE SON OF GOD? The NIV also has Jesuit (Catholic) influences - The NIV Bible and Jesuit Priest The Catholic Connection | Paw Creek Ministries...

Ooops, that is the logical fallacy of 'ad majorem', 'ad populum' in the least. The amount of persons that adhere to an ideology in no way is logical evidence of the factualness of that ideology, otherwise 'catholicism' would be true, wouldn't it? But you and I know it ain't. At least I hope...