Search results

You are going to quote from some random guy's facebook page (Dominick Kortokrax's, of the TR academy)? You are claiming this is an authoritative 'scholar'? The guy is not citing any official 'scholar'. He is just posting (on facebook, no less) is own personal biases. Additionally, Dean...

I see that you dislike "Burgon", but I also see that you simply caluminated him, rather than provided any evidence that his written materials on the mss under discussion were incorrect. I did not see you refute a single page, paragraph, or sentence of his written material. Also, who said that...

You have accused me of doing something which I have not done in any of my replies. This is simply you, again, arguing against your imaginary version of 'me', which is just 'you' again. I do desire you come to speak with me, rather than just 'you', but it is your prerogative, if you so choose...

Who said anything about "unitarianism"? Not I. I am dealing with the old 'arian' (Ecc. 1:9, 3:15) error. Your "imagination" does run a bit all over the place to be sure: Imagining yourself to be "persecuted", Imagining I have said things I did not, &c. Come back to the scriptures please...

The fallen flesh (Rom. 8:3) of Christ Jesus was "made" (Gal. 4:4), but "flesh" and "spirit" (mind / heart) are two differing things as just shown to you. Gal_4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, Joh_3:6 That which is born...

This was already agreed to, already accepted, already admitted, already granted, and never, not even once) questioned by my position. You are simply agreeing with my position. This is no evidence against my position. Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the...

You are claiming you are being "persecuted", by 'me'? What is your evidence of this? I saw none provided. You are simply claiming a status which does not rightfully belong to you. No one is persecuting you. What is happening, is that your ideology is being shown to be of, and originating...

You seem to be making a point about Majuscule (all CAPS), and miniscule (all lowercasing) mss, as opposed to the English translations, which were shown to you: John 1:1 in many modern English translations - John 1:1 - Bible Gateway ".. . KJ21 ... was God. ASV ... was God. AMP ... was God...

Perhaps this is the issue. Most people cannot see the nose on their face, unless others hold up a mirror to them. If they try to look on their own, they might see faint glimpses of an outline of a nose on their face, just in front of them, but might not believe it exists, even though they are...

"The best scholars" says who? This is a fallacious logic and quite subjective. You provided no foundational reasoning to what is "best", nor provided the evidence that such "scholars" (as you propose, but not provide) give to support their claims, should such claims be produced. you didn't...

Again, this is you citing 'you'. You did not cite anyone authoritative, while I, in response, have done so. I provided numerous references, both modern and historical. Simply saying that my reply is "gibberish" without evidence to that effect, is simply 'hand-waving'. It is evidence that...

No, not at all. The Son is always Deity (Jhn. 8:58; Exo. 3:14), whether in the Father's enshrouded glory, or in the humility of the servitude of fallen human nature (Php. 2), as per 1 Tim. 3:16; Heb. 1:8-13; Psa. 102:12,24-27; Exo. 3; Hos. 1; Zec. 3, Jhn. 1; &c. Again, citing 'you' is just...

No. I was right, as just showed (again). The Son is not in "isolation" in Psa, 110:1. He is seated on the eternal throne of everlasting Deity with the Father, as Heb. 1:3 also declares. Only eternal Deity can do that as shown by numerous texts in scripture, and in the linked materials. Wait...

Again, please reconsider my response. You are saying that which I already agreed to, already admitted to, and already subscribe to in regards Psa. 110:1 - WHO IS THE SON OF GOD? In other words, you simply agreed with my position at that point, and is thus not evidence of your position, nor...

You were interested before? From the responses, I could not see this, since your replies have not addressed what I have said, in the details, and you have obviously not considered the entire linked materials, as scripture asks you to, Pro. 18:13,17. Again, you have accused me of espousing...

No. I only condemn the false theology, the incorrect ideology you are espoused to. That you are in error, can be fixed, so long as you are willing to admit your error, and come into harmony with the scriptural account, and so be saved. Otherwise, you cannot be, as per Jhn. 8:21,24, and other...

Incorrect. I can know, and do know, what you "think" since you have put your thoughts into print for to read, and as scripture says: Pro_4:23 Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life. Mat_12:34 O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things...

Obviously, but that is not the question of the OP (designed by yourself to place into question the eternal Deity of Jesus), but simply only half of the whole picture (as I said Muslims also attempt to do / claim about Jesus). Of course, Jesus was the 'true man' (1 Tim. 2:5), even the "last...

Not really my concern. It is a disgusting doctrine born of the "doctrines of devils" What you think, is not really relevant to the discussion. Only scriptural truth, which will set anyone straight, if they allow it.

You are confused as to what 'polytheism' really is. I have done no such thing. There are actually "three", not just "two" in Jhn. 1:1, as I have said in my responses. Did you not read those? I even stated that the Holy Ghost is the third, the hidden camera man behind the scenes, as the...