Search results

Page 1 of 2. Examination of Modern New Testament Text Criticism Theory and Methods version 2.0 By: Jeffrey A. Young Ph.D. youngdrj@juno.com For: Pastor Kenneth K. Miller 10/31/95 This document may be reproduced in its entirety free of charge for non-commercial private use only. This document...

Yep. The KJV translation process was different in every respect. You support the other English Bibles as if the translation process was the same in any regard. To say the two were translated by anything like the same translation process is one of the biggest lies ever told.

Whole article is good thinking. And we need to think about these things.

To whine and cry and complain about the King James' use of basically normal, everyday language "all seems like 'stuff and nonsense' because we’re still using virtually the same spelling and word forms used back in 1762 and 1769 when the spelling and grammar of the 1611 King James Bible was...

The way I see it, if we are brushed up on the simplest articulation of any given subject, then we already know what AI breaks out with in an organized fashion and that input acts to provide some needed background, for better clarity, as a starting point. Correct me if I'm wrong, but 'theology'...

"in effect attempt to suggest", (by any manner imaginable). "assume", (anything imaginable) "or claim" (or say they "claim" no matter what they actually "claim" and it doesn't matter who "claims" it) "that the KJV is the word of God translated into English" (Yes, it is ONE THAT WE ARE SURE OF...

So, what do you consider KJV-only reasoning/teaching? Who is it you call KJV-Only? I'm not talking about the 'believers'. I mean that was the initial consensus with the Spiritualists and directive given by the Luciferins to Westcott and Hort who then treated the Bible like they would any other...

It's O.K. to employ a suburb Translation which best expresses the intended meaning, regardless of where someone thinks it comes down in the supposed criteria and recent definitions that attempt to differentiate between Translation Philosophies. "....the goal of the dynamic equivalence is to...

From English version to English version, the number of times the NKJV omits "God" is 51. There is no getting around that. If you'd you'd like to visit The King James Bible Comparison Page there are 770 verses which have been corrupted in the modern versions. They also reveal that the modern...

For no good reason. Only to disparage and denigrate the Author and rob Him of the Glory of repeating His Name, 'God', within the context of the Bible, His Own Written Word and Record of Himself, as in Psalm 138:2; "I will Worship toward Thy Holy Temple, and praise Thy Name for Thy Lovingkindness...

Mark 6:20 - "observed him" "For Herod feared John, knowing that he was a just man and an holy, and observed him; and when he heard him, he did many things, and heard him gladly." From Top 10 Problem Passages for the King James Bible Translation by Craig Lantz, ThD, PhD, Theologian, Author, and...

From Top 10 Problem Passages for the King James Bible Translation by Craig Lantz, ThD, PhD, Theologian, Author, and Friend of Jesus. So, for the Bible to say, "a just man and an holy, and observed him" are a couple of the top ten Problems Passages in the King James Translation, is being a...

According to your jaded bias needed for your kangaroo Bully Pulpit. According to your half-baked, decreped, sacriligious, and jaded bias needed for your kangaroo Bully Pulpit. Don't bother trying to show 'where', because you'll only disclose your deceit with additional clarification. There...

Tell everyone so they will know that maybe you should consider the removal of 15 entire verses an enormously more serious problem and alarming inadequacy in the Modern Bibles, just for starters, compared to 'two words' that were supplied in only a half dozens versions that you consider to have...

Where's your equal measures and standards on what you accuse the KJV makers of here??? You seem terribly concerned "by leaving out the two words 'by election'" which you say were "mutilated and corrupted by James’s revisers", although "by election", is not in the interlinear, above, or any...

"The phrase "ordained them elders by election" refers to the Greek word χειροτονέω (pronounced khei-ro-to-NEH-o), which appears in Acts 14:23. In the original biblical text, it is written as χειροτονήσαντες (verb form: cheirotonesantes), meaning "having appointed" or "having chosen." [1, 2, 3]...

χειροτονήσαντες As it says below, it is not impossible that the choice as well as the ordination of the presbyters may be referred to Paul and Barnabas, cf. the pronoun αὐτοῖς: “having appointed for them,” and in newly founded communities it was not unnatural that the Apostles should exercise...

Oh yeah, this is where I told everyone in my post somewhere to remind me of how some people are utterly dependent on labeling anyone that sees even '1 Problem' with any one of the 'modern translations' as KJV-Only. There it is. I don't believe any KJV-only reasoning/teaching. However, you are...

You want to check them against complete manuscripts, like the King James Version, and see what we already knew God said, before someone sold the idea that the collections of manuscripts they and so many others used through the centuries were corrupted and needed to be dismissed and ignored and...

In this inexcusably irresponsible hack job, hit-piece, the author, Craig Lantz, ThD, PhD, is not only dependent upon his creation of a Strawman to define anyone who makes use of the King James Version as being King James Only "people who have been indoctrinated their entire life into the KJV...