Search results

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/meet-the-democrats-who-fly-under-the-radar-but-are-just-as-radical-as-party-headliners/ar-AA2bNqkg?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=6aa00a3d2f814ee9a698df35589d21b5&ei=41...

Otto H. Bostrom wrote: “It is a well known fact that the Massoretes had a critical apparatus of their Holy Scriptures” (Alternative Readings, p. 21). Otto Bostrom asserted: “It has been shown that the Qere and the Ketib of one MS. have been reversed in another, so that what is Qere in one is...

It is your modern position that is built on the words of men, not the doctrine of Scripture. I permitted the Scriptures themselves to define what would constitute textual criticism. I am presenting the biblical view of it. While the term textual criticism may not be found in Scripture...

Your opinion is wrong. My view is based on what the Scriptures state and teach, which I apply to the verifiable facts throughout history. I quote men to provide evidence concerning the facts of history and the facts concerning the making of post-NT Bible translations. Your extra-biblical two...

Does modern KJV-only teaching in effect imply or suggest that the inspired original-language words of Scripture given by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles were largely lost and must be restored or reconstructed by textual criticism decisions and conjectural emendation decisions of...

Bill Fortenberry, who is a KJV defender with views similar to yours, would claim to be an authority on English. Bill Fortenberry claims to have read 10,000 books in English. Are you claiming to be a self-appointed authority on the English language with more knowledge than these three people...

You improperly continue to try to put words in my mouth that I do not say. My statements that you try unsoundly to misrepresent and twist would be stating the same thing as the truths stated in these verses (Deut. 4:2, Deut. 12:32, Prov. 30:6, Rev. 22:18-19). According to these scriptural...

Your invented entailment is not the logical conclusion to what I accurately stated in agreement with Scriptural truths. You have not refuted my actual statements. You continue your bogus misrepresentations. I nowhere said that God failed in preservation as you try to suggest. On the other...

The 1833 Webster’s Bible, the 1842 revision of the KJV by Baptists, the 1962 Teen-age Version of the Holy Bible by Jay Green, the 1982 NKJV, the 1986 Literal Translation in The Interlinear Bible, the 1990 Modern King James Version, the 1994 21st Century King James Version, the 1998 Third...

Your imagined conclusion is something that you invented since that is not what I stated. I nowhere suggested that God failed in preservation so you are trying to impose your false conclusion on to my accurate statement. My statement deals with human responsibility, but it does not suggest that...

The 1611 KJV does not preserve all God's words down to the number of the noun at Deuteronomy 33:17. At Deuteronomy 33:17, the 1611 KJV changed this noun that was singular in number in the Hebrew Masoretic text and in all the earlier pre-1611 English Bibles to a plural. Do you contradict you...

In other words, are you directly claiming that preservation of the Scriptures in the NKJV is God's work, not man's performance? Are you saying that the Scriptures are preserved in the same sense in present-day Modern English in the NKJV or other modern English Bibles as the Scriptures are...

You earlier posted: "You always follow the Qere." Are you not contradicting what you yourself stated earlier in your own words?

Are you now contradicting what you yourself asserted? Are you claiming that later post-1611 translation into English and later translation/editorial decisions and opinions do not change God's preservation of His words? Does your own stated reasoning against present English Bible translations...

Your inconsistent opinion is not true. Do you fail to practice what you preach in your accusations against present English Bible translations? Are you arguing that preservation of the Scripture in the translating of God's words into present-day Modern English is all God's work, not man's...

Does your assertion condemn the KJV translators for not following the Qere at Isaiah 9:3?

I am agreeing with what is stated and taught in these verses (Deut. 4:2, Deut. 12:32, Prov. 30:6, Rev. 22:18-19). Your invented or imagined conclusion is not the conclusion from my scripturally-based statement. You are trying to read into my statement with your strawman misrepresentation...

I do not at all say that God's preservation failed. I stated the truth while you improperly try to twist it into something that I did not say. You are not accurately presenting my scripturally-based point. The truth remains that a scribe or copier did not preserve one of God's words when he...

That is not what my true scripturally-based statement asserts. I am agreeing with what is stated and taught in these verses (Deut. 4:2, Deut. 12:32, Prov. 30:6, Rev. 22:18-19). Your invented or imagined conclusion is not the conclusion from my scripturally-based statement. You are trying to...

My very words do not say what your strawman misrepresentation says. Are you rejecting the truths stated in the verses (Deut. 4:2, Deut. 12:32, Prov. 30:6, Rev. 22:18-19) to which I appealed?