Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
True. But you will end up with the disaster you used above from the Arminian website. You make a mistake assuming that Calvinists don't use the Bible. I don't use the Bible much on this site for the simple reason it doesn't help. We are on post 237 and all looking at the exact same verse. If you don't realize Owen had a verse or two for everything he said then I know you have not read Owen.
I don't know how many times I have said on here that faith is a condition for salvation in Calvinism. What is not happening though is Jesus doing his part and then the Triune God having to sit passively by and see what we are going to do with our free and autonomous wills. That is unbiblical and goes against scores of verses. And don't get caught up in can't vs won't. The meaning can be interchangeable and often is.
Tulip Truths have biblical support, its the Truth of scripture, the Gospel, you reject Tulip Truth, you reject the Gospel of Gods Sovereign Grace.Without clear scriptural support it is just your opinion.
It doesnt matter what you say, 1 Jn 2:2 is about the elect.Then as I said before you are promoting universalism. The fact you can not understand that is troubling.
So you believe that Christ died and shed His Blood for people, redeeming them by His Blood and they still die in their sins and go to hell ? Yes or NoThe answer you want to hear.
But who is then "the Lord" that bought them? And how? And how does it bring them to distruction?
". . . denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. . . ."
Answer my questions.
Who is that Lord that bought them?
Why are they denying him?
How did this Lord buy them?
Biblical references please.
It doesnt matter what you say, 1 Jn 2:2 is about the elect.
Yes world means elect in 1 Jn 2:2BF it is not me you are disagreeing with, it is the bible. You are saying that the word "world G2889" really means "elect G1588". Do you think John or the Holy Spirit were so dumb that they did not know the difference between those words.
BF your allegiance to calvinism is shocking. It is to sad that you do not show the the same loyalty to God and His word.
1Jn 2:2
And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins,
and
not for ours only
but
also for the whole world.
You see no problem with twisting His word to fit your theology. What you are doing is wilful and you will be held to account for it. My God have mercy on you.
Yes world means elect in 1 Jn 2:2
The Whole World in 1 John 2:2Yes world means elect in 1 Jn 2:2
Do you see how you project your own bias into your post as an insult?So what your saying is that you BF know more than John and the Holy Spirit. You think you have to correct the inspired word of God. Your arrogance is showing again BF.
Do you see how you project your own bias into your post as an insult?
You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig. Your comments are backhanded insults and you should be wise enough to know this. Go back and read what you wrote. You should be ashamed.What I said is not an insult it is factual. Read through BF's posts. He continues to impose his views over that text of scripture and even wants to change the meaning of words found in scripture. That is arrogance.
The Whole World in 1 John 2:2
One cannot change the heart of a person who is focused on himself as the determiner of his own destiny.
You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig. Your comments are backhanded insults and you should be wise enough to know this. Go back and read what you wrote. You should be ashamed.
So what your saying is that you BF know more than John and the Holy Spirit. You think you have to correct the inspired word of God. Your arrogance is showing again BF.
Read your personal projection, which he didn't say, but you certainly did say. Notice how you personally accuse him. Silverhair, you are wrong to do that. You have spoken poorly and been insulting.What is the insult, pointing out that when you think you know more than the Holy Spirit that is just arrogance. What would you call it?
We are to humble ourselves before God not try to correct His inspired word.
Silverhair, do you believe in universal payment for all sins? If you don't, then you are not taking the words of the text literally.Well of course you would point to a calvinist site as support of your calvinist view. That still does not alter the fact of what the text actually says.
1Jn 2:2
And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins,
and
not for ours only
but
also for the whole world.
I understand that you find these words hard to deal with as they do not fit your theology. But there in lays the problem for the calvinist. Calvinism is not the standard, the bible is and you just have to learn to trust what it says rather than trust what some man tells you it says.
Read your personal projection, which he didn't say, but you certainly did say. Notice how you personally accuse him. Silverhair, you are wrong to do that. You have spoken poorly and been insulting.
If you are unable to see this, then you are simply unable to see.
The whole world of 1 Jn 2:2 is the elect whole world !So what your saying is that you BF know more than John and the Holy Spirit. You think you have to correct the inspired word of God. Your arrogance is showing again BF.
I understand that, Im witnessing the Gospel Matt 24:14The Whole World in 1 John 2:2
One cannot change the heart of a person who is focused on himself as the determiner of his own destiny.
Silverhair, do you believe in universal payment for all sins? If you don't, then you are not taking the words of the text literally.
You caress this verse and add your own interpretation to it by declaring that it is not true, if a person does not express belief in Jesus propitiation. For that sin, you deny Jesus has done enough. So, you also have to interpret this verse in order to hold your view. You are no different than a calvinist as you also must look beyond this verse in order to hold your position.
The only position that can be held with no explanation is the position of universal salvation for all the world so that all humans are saved and no one goes to hell. Is that the position you hold? Because that is what John would be saying if we didn't allow the rest of scripture to interpret this verse.
Are you a universalist?
I am not. But, when you just quote the verse and leave it at that, the only conclusion would be the view of universalism.
So, are you a universalist?