What is the man's motive for giving the good gift? Scripture is clear when it says " all our righteousness is as filthy rags".
You fail at answering direct questions?
What is the motive of a mother nursing her own child?
Is it a good work?
Her motive is the physical salvation/well-being of her child. If she doesn't nourish him he will die. Is it therefore a "good work"? Of course it is!
Even Jesus would classify it as a good work.
"If you then being evil give good gifts..." Apparently you deny the words of Jesus by pitting scripture against scripture. That is a sad way of expounding scripture or doing bible study.
I do not contend a dead sinner cannot physically do nothing, but that they cannot spiritually do anything good. There is a difference. "They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one" (Psalm 14:3). I suppose you are going to tell me here that the "none" in this verse does not mean "none"?
I will tell you that a person can do good. Obviously a mother nourishing her child is a good thing.
I will also tell you that a sinner can actively seek God for God has put it in their hearts to do so:
Seek the Lord while you may find him.
Now God commands all men to repent.
God commands all men to love their neighbor as themselves--a command that he gave to unsaved lawyers, Pharisees, etc. He expected them to keep it. Their reply was: "Who is my neighbor," and Jesus replied with the parable of the Good Samaritan, which is applicable to all mankind.
--Doing good won't get one to heaven, but it is expected of all mankind.
Jesus told the rich young ruler: "Keep the law, and you shall live."
He was expected to do good. He had a reputation of being good before he even approached Jesus.
--It is our good that will not get us to heaven. But it is still good.
Your interpretation of these verses is wrong.
In Isaiah, he says all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags. True. But they are still righteousnesses. The point is that they, in the sight of God, will not get us to heaven.
Again, you must not understand what it means to believe in the doctrine of total depravity, being spiritually dead does not mean you can't feel physical pain. Yes, he could feel the flames of Hell in that he still had a spirit that was suffering the torment of eternal damnation. This has nothing to do with if someone who is spiritually being dead in sin can perform spiritual good.
I do understand it. The depravity of man is not equal to the the Calvinist's Total Inability of man which is not a scriptural doctrine. Calvin did not invent the Bible. Man has a sinful nature, but that doesn't mean he can't choose or think or make choices of his own will.
Jesus said:
Joh 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
--He gave man a choice: to believe or not.
Joh 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
--Again, the choice is man's: to believe or not to believe.
Joh 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
--Man's choice: to believe or not to believe. God doesn't force him.
Joh 20:31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.
--The theme of the entire book is summarized right here in this verse:
Man has a choice that is set before him: to believe or not to believe. Which choice
will he make?
Only those who are already "of God" hear Jesus and the prophets. Those that are not "of God" will not hear Jesus or the prophets. Jesus makes this clear, "He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God." (John 8:47)
When Jesus walked the face of this earth ALL heard him. ALL had the opportunity to believe. See the above scriptures. Judas walked with him, heard him, saw the miracles, and lived with for three years. Still he never believed. That was his choice.
You do too contradict the verses that says "Salvation is of the Lord".
No contradiction. When have I ever even inferred that it isn't?
Do you agree that regeneration is a phase of salvation?
No I don't agree. Regeneration IS salvation.
If so, how can salvation be "of the Lord if" man causes there own regeneration by their faith?
Read 1Pet.1:23 and then believe it. Don't deny it.
This is what you teach isn't is? You may counter that you do not believe faith is a work, but you can't get around the fact that ultimately if faith causes regeneration and man can lay claim to generating their own faith, that it is not a gift of God, then man, not God, is the cause of their own regeneration, thus salvation is not "of the Lord" per your teaching.
Regeneration is salvation. Even if you define it differently it happens at the same time.
The source of faith is "hearing the Word of God" (Rom.10:17). One must hear the gospel before he gets saved. He must understand the gospel before he gets saved. He must put his faith in that message that the gospel gives, that is in the blood of Christ and then and only then is he saved. Once he puts his faith in Christ, then he is regenerated/saved. Salvation has always been like that.