And we have to be careful not to fall into the trap of making the Bible not say what it so clearly says in order to make it comply with our faulty understanding of what a logical fallacy is.
I agree. We need to adhere to God's Word, not assume things based on our own understanding (we cannot assume Adam would have lived forever had he not eaten of the fruit as this is philosophical and hypothetical....it ADDS to Scripture).
When we do start reasoning out things we have to be logical in our reasoning. God is not a God of chaos but of order.
The addition to Scripture that Adam would have lived forever had he not eaten of the fruit us a formal logical fallacy. It is denying the antecedent (fallacy of the inverse or inverse error).
If P, then Q.
Therefore, if not P, then not Q.
It is faulty reasoning, but worse than that in this case it actually adds to God's Word what is not there.
I hold a high view of Scripture (of the biblical text). So I do believe we have to handle Scripture with respect, as our singular authority for doctrine, as objective, and as complete. This includes making sure to identify errors and fallacies in our understanding.
Would Adam have lived forever? We cannot say (it is a philosophical, hypothetical question). My caution to those who would add to Scripture is that he would have is twofold - first, your reasoning is flawed and presents God as a God of chaos as you move into vain philosophy. And second, you are adding to scripture.
I seriously doubt anyone would question that @Martin Marprelate is correct.
We agree (I think) that we are to avoid vain philosophy and hypotheticals to adhere to the Word of God. And we agree (I hope) that God is not a foolish God prone to illogical discourse and chaos.
With Adam, it is wrong (it is adding to Scripture) to say that Adam would have lived forever had he not eaten of the fruit. It is also a formal logical fallacy.
To simply the fallacy for those who may not grasp the fact - If I say you and your family will die if you jump into shark infested waters with those T-bone steaks tied around your neck this does not mean I am saying that you will live if you remove the steaks and jump into the water. It is not saying that you will live if you stay in the boat either. It is saying that on the day you jump into the water with those steaks tied around your neck you will surely die.
We cannot play the fool to accept doctrines. We cannot pretend God is foolish and illogical. These questions - "Can God make a round square", "Would Adam have lived forever had he not taken the fruit", "Could Christ have sinned and if not did he have free-will" are all philosophical questions. What makes the one about Adam much worse is people often answer foolishly by denying the antecedent.
The fact is we do not know what would have happened if Adam did not eat of the fruit except that Adam would have acted in such a way as to make void God's plan. Perhaps he would have lived forever. Or perhaps he would have disobeyed in some other way. We do not know and it is wrong (it is a sin) to add to Scripture.
My question is in no way hypothetical so all these cautions are unnecessary and in my opinion, a needless distraction from the subject.
Scriptures are clear Adam died as a result of sinning. I am examining that truth as revealed in scriptures in greater detail without no speculation whatsoever