I see Martin is at it again, misrepresenting my view.
1) I referred to the opportunity for salvation, and Martin addresses his supposed content of faith.
2) Did I refer to taking an exam, or God crediting the person's faith as righteous faith or not?
3) Martin says taint so, but without any specifics.
4) Martin refers to Romans 9:33 but somehow does not grasp that the ones believing on Him are the ones God has credited with righteous faith.
5) Martin says individual election occurred in eternity, ignoring that individuals are given to Christ in the present.
6) Martin seems not to grasp it is God who baptizes individuals into Christ, thus overruling is an absurdity.
7) No verse says or suggests any individual is given to Christ before Christ was glorified on the cross. Full Stop!
1) I referred to the opportunity for salvation, and Martin addresses his supposed content of faith.
2) Did I refer to taking an exam, or God crediting the person's faith as righteous faith or not?
3) Martin says taint so, but without any specifics.
4) Martin refers to Romans 9:33 but somehow does not grasp that the ones believing on Him are the ones God has credited with righteous faith.
5) Martin says individual election occurred in eternity, ignoring that individuals are given to Christ in the present.
6) Martin seems not to grasp it is God who baptizes individuals into Christ, thus overruling is an absurdity.
7) No verse says or suggests any individual is given to Christ before Christ was glorified on the cross. Full Stop!
Last edited: