Perhaps I should learn GreekYes, they remove the `him`.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Perhaps I should learn GreekYes, they remove the `him`.
I have a question, do know any other Languages besides English as I know some other languages and there are times when something can be generically translated as such, but it also have a deeper meaning. This seems to be the reason for the usage of the italics in the Geneva Bible and onwards, maybe some before used it.Perhaps I should learn Greek
I only know some Italian swear words… LOL because I’m from Northern New Jersey & I worked in the construction business in NY and NJ, so I have dialectic abilities for Nablatan, Calebrase & Sicilian (your basic Southern Italian).I have a question, do know any other Languages besides English as I know some other languages and there are times when something can be generically translated as such, but it also have a deeper meaning. This seems to be the reason for the usage of the italics in the Geneva Bible and onwards, maybe some before used it.
Anyhow, we don't need to learn Greek/Hebrew, it taketh years to fully understand it, though I guess there is no evilness of learning it, but we should just trust the English.
The King James Bible scholars were educated, some were even understanding this biblical languages when they were yet a youth, some even knew more than 15 lanuages, they also compared the preveious translations, foreign bibles and checked the Hebrew/Greek/Amaramic.
There is no need for any relearning of the Greek/Hebrew, and we don't speak Biblclical Hebrew/Greek in the 21st century.
I believe the Bible, there is no need for any liberal, Bible corrector, money makingness, we have the word of God and no need to change it. Its enough they have doubted the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, they are the ones privily bringing in damnable heresies of adding and subtracting from the word of God. Even denying the Lord Jesus.
Also, I do know that the King James translators were mostly Anglican and had some doctrine that I would not believe in. Anyhow, they were not biased in their translation and even the Bible rebukes some of the unscriptural views of the Anglican Church.
I don't know why the Free Will obsessees think John Calvin invented predestination.Also, I have never studied any of the works of Calvin. All I’m doing is interpreting the text exactly as it is written and if a man named John Calvin happens to agree with me, then so be it.
No need to namecall. I am not a Calvinist and I am not an "obsessee". I frankly don't care who invented it.I don't know why the Free Will obsessees think John Calvin invented predestination.
Not being a Calvinist is not what I was talking about. Some people are fixated on predestination and talk about Calvin as a heresiarch. That's different from disagreeing with him and Luther.No need to namecall. I am not a Calvinist and I am not an "obsessee". I frankly don't care who invented it.
You must be kidding !Act 13:48 And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed.
"Ordained" is tasso in the Greek and means to place in order. There may be a possibility that what is meant is the emphasis on arrangement more than the placing such that a mechanism is in place for gentiles to be processed into eternal life. by their faith through Christ. What may be in view here is less the act of God on an individual basis and more the description of how God established a mechanism of gentiles to come out of an unsaved state to an orderly saved state.
Being appointed to eternal life may be connected to the arrangement within the everlasting covenant, when the heirs were appointed. The word means: tasso
to put in order, to station
- to place in a certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint
Jesus said His Father had appointed Him a kingdom Lk 22:29
And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me;
Now the Father has already appointed, determined the subjects of that Kingdom.
Remember when James and Johns mother asked this question Matt 20:20-23
20 Then came to him the mother of Zebedees children with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of him.
21 And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on the left, in thy kingdom.
22 But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able.
23 And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not mine to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father.
See that ? The occupants of the appointed have already been predetermined
As per usual you cant see it.And again we see the twisted view of scripture that you present. If you are going to understand Act 13:48 you need to read the context in which it is found.
The Gentiles and Jews had heard Paul's gospel message, those that accepted it and trusted in the one spoken of took that direction for eternal life, and believed. Act_13:26-52 is showing the contrast between the resistant Jews and the willing Gentiles and should be read in a way that places the responsibility for believing on the people, that the people positioned themselves either for eternal life by accepting the truth or for eternal death by rejecting it.
But, BF, that does not fit your man-made theology so you will reject it as you seem to do with a number of passages of scripture.
As per usual you cant see it.
See eternal life/salvation is by covenant arrangement , promise to a seed Gal 3:15-18You are consistent. You cannot defend your false views so just respond with non-answers.
Your theological view has not biblical support but you cannot see that or rather will not admit it as then you would have to reevaluate your whole understanding of Gods word.
See eternal life/salvation is by covenant arrangement , promise to a seed Gal 3:15-18
15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.
16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
The inheritance is salvation and all its blessings, eternal life, now those Gentiles who were appointed to eternal life were heirs, salvation has been promised to them Titus 1:1-2
Paul, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God's elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after godliness;
2 In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began;
I know you wont understand this, but there may be someone else this will be helpful to
Yes, when you just grab a Bible and read Acts chapter 13 as a whole it's clear that the problem was that Jews were not convinced that gentiles belonged there and the idea that gentiles were being saved because it was "ordained" was to hammer home that gentiles were indeed part of this and by God's design. The Old Testament scripture reference is even given to show that gentile salvation was ordained. When Paul tells the Jews that they had judged themselves unworthy of eternal life scripture doesn't say they were ordained to not be part of this.Salvation is promised to both Jews and Gentiles via one means only, faith in the risen Christ.
Yes salvation is by a covenant/promise made to Abraham.
@Silverhair
And His Seed. That seed is Christ and His Church Gal 3:16-18
16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham/and His seed by promise.
The promise was made to Abraham and his seed.