• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Are you producing False Converts?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I am by no mean calvinst, but I understand and agree with the sentiment of Agedman. WE do not WIN souls ( I do understand this to be a "figure of christian speak). It is God who ultimately wins souls, not us, our role is to be salt and light, to strive to demonstrate the fruit of spirit in our lives, to ready and prepared to give an account of the joy that resides in us, to explain, to discus and apologetically persuade others to consider the message of the gospel. We are to plant seeds, others to nurture, God grants the increase.[/QUOTE]

Exactly correct QF...:thumbsup::thumbsup:This is the primary focus...it is bringing the whole man to the whole Christ....
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I do sometimes use non Calvinist gospel tracts such as Chic Tracts, Fellowship Tract League, Mark Cahill, etc.. However I do realize that most of these tracts do nothing but produce false converts in that they lead one to say a prayer and have no confession nor repentance from sin. Those whom say the prayer are no different than they were 5 minutes earlier and therefore a false convert.

You use non-Calvinist tracts and they produce false converts. [smh]

Now do you see why I stated earlier that it is typically Calvinists that bring up the subject of false converts?

I find it ironic that some Calvinists can confidently say that certain people are false converts yet many Calvinists will admit they will not know for sure if they are elect and going to Heaven until they die.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You use non-Calvinist tracts and they produce false converts. [smh]

Now do you see why I stated earlier that it is typically Calvinists that bring up the subject of false converts?

I find it ironic that some Calvinists can confidently say that certain people are false converts yet many Calvinists will admit they will not know for sure if they are elect and going to Heaven until they die.

Its apparent you have a bias against Calvinists!:smilewinkgrin:
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
We plant and water and till the ground, but it is God alone who causes the increase in the number of born anew believers. We know that the professing visible church is made up of wheat (born anew believers) and tares ( those that profess Christ but for whatever reason, God did not credit their faith as righteousness.)

If we do not present the whole Gospel (warts and all) we increase the likelihood of producing professing believers that did not actually go "all in" for Christ. Did we tell them that all who profess the name of Jesus will be persecuted? Did we tell them many believers have suffered and died without ever receiving earthly blessings like health and wealth, long life?
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You use non-Calvinist tracts and they produce false converts. [smh]

Now do you see why I stated earlier that it is typically Calvinists that bring up the subject of false converts?

I find it ironic that some Calvinists can confidently say that certain people are false converts yet many Calvinists will admit they will not know for sure if they are elect and going to Heaven until they die.

Are you being mentored by Winman? He hates Calvinism and all because he does not understand the doctrines. Do not hate something you do not understand but trust in God to bring His elect to salvation.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Do not hate something you do not understand

After years of debates on BB, as well as other research, I understand Calvinism fairly well.

but trust in God to bring His elect to salvation.

That's rich considering you posted a thread about false converts, essentially saying God can't/doesn't/won't save people via a certain method of witnessing.
 

saturneptune

New Member
Suggesting that we are not told to win souls. Can't be more anti-evangelism than that.

Well said. While I know we disagree in this area to a degree, I stand four square with you about hypers. Obviously election without hearing the Word of God, shows not only arrogance, but ignorance to the point of retardation, mixed with two parts of hell. The line between Calvinism and hypers is the same line dividing Heaven and the Lake of Fire.

I guess these freaks of nature rip out Matthew and Romans for starters. Maybe the hyper version of Scripture says faith comes by election and election by election. Even the most conservative of Presbyterian churches do not hold to such nonsense.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"Obviously election without hearing the Word of God, shows not only arrogance, but ignorance to the point of retardation,"

So what do you say to a mentally challenged individual who cant understand & process the gospel? Are they saved?
 

Mexdeaf

New Member
I could well be wrong, but I really don't think anyone on here is a hyperC.

We may just disagree on the "1-2-3, pray after me" presentation of salvation. I spend as much time as it takes when dealing with someone to make sure that they understand, and apply no high-pressure tactics to get them to make a decision.

Had the privilege of sharing the Gospel with a deaf man yesterday and he received the Lord. Nothing sweeter than that.
 

saturneptune

New Member
"Obviously election without hearing the Word of God, shows not only arrogance, but ignorance to the point of retardation,"

So what do you say to a mentally challenged individual who cant understand & process the gospel? Are they saved?

Since I work with them everyday in the job I have since retiring, I can tell you how I handle it. I explain the Gospel to them as well as I can. I try to word it to their level, which varies greatly. Some respond and some do not. I leave the rest to the Lord.

That is not what we are talking about here, is it? We are talking about a doctrine amongst well thinking individuals who can read the Bible that argue that "faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God" is meaningless. I cannot think of a more heretical teaching (to be nice about it) than I have ever heard.

Except for the grace of God, each and everyone of us could be like these folks.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Since I work with them everyday in the job I have since retiring, I can tell you how I handle it. I explain the Gospel to them as well as I can. I try to word it to their level, which varies greatly. Some respond and some do not. I leave the rest to the Lord.

That is not what we are talking about here, is it? We are talking about a doctrine amongst well thinking individuals who can read the Bible that argue that "faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God" is meaningless. I cannot think of a more heretical teaching (to be nice about it) than I have ever heard.

Except for the grace of God, each and everyone of us could be like these folks.

Let me make sure I clarify......Are you saying that hearing the Gospel is prerequisite to being saved?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top