NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
For an interesting perspective check out the eleven lawgivers from history in the Supreme Court building.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yeah. Dave Barton should be ashamed of himself as well as his followers who have tried to revise American history.What is a growing common error is the downplaying of the true founding of this country. Shame on everyone who acts in such a way.
Surely, if this were a Christian nation there would be some mention of that in the Constitution, it's founding document.
While I agree that a nation cannot receive Christ, given the beliefs of most of the people in this country, and comparing them favorably to the founders' beliefs, means this nation has always held Christianity and its precepts in highest regard. A Forbes article, Was America founded as a Christian nation? affirms this.America is not a christian nation, like that is even possible for a nation to be christian. Only people get to be christian.
The Founders disagreed on much, but were nearly unanimous concerning biblical morality. They understood the relationship between state and society differently than progressive thinkers today: government cannot mold man. Righteous men must mold government which requires the inculcation of virtue through vibrant churches and the transmittal of values generationally via a social structure based on families.
I'm not sure where you get this erroneous idea. There were some minor players in both preparing the Declaration and the Constitution that came from states with officially sanctioned churches, but that was never an intent expressed for the nation as a whole. Again, from the Forbes article:Founders were a mixed bag of theological opinions, some very good others, not so good. Some wanted a national church, state supported like they grew up with or had back in their own states, but thankfully, this suggestion did not prevail.
Usurping the First Amendment to obstruct public expressions of faith would leave the Founders aghast. Not only did the Constitution leave extant the official religions authorized in most of the states, as historian Thomas Woods explains, prohibiting prayer in public schools “runs exactly contrary to the Framers’ intent … a stupefying departure from traditional American principles and an intolerable encroachment on communities’ rights to self-government.” Jefferson ’s “wall of separation” guarded faith, or lack thereof, against political interference.
Wrong. Most other religions, and certainly atheists as currently constituted, have absolutely no tolerance for "other opinions." In fact, it is codified in certain translations of the Qur'an that others must submit to Allah or die. Hardly a description of a "tolerant" faith.People are allowed to worship or not worship as they see fit, as it should be, but that hardly makes America christian. I would argue allowing for many opinions about God and even the opinion that there is no God, isn't a christian value at all but rather a secular humanist value.
Neither does your adherence to your own warped interpretation of the facts make you correct. The truth lies in between, but tends more toward the concept of Christian principles underlying the founding of this nation.If it makes you feel better to listen to David Barton and his stretched and distorted "history", then by all means go right ahead, doesn't make it true.
America being a Christian Nation is a strawman argument that only those who hate that America was founded on biblical principles are making.
You might want to calm down, take a deep breath, and go back and read what Rev actually wrote, because you obviously went off half-cocked. Then you can respond to what he said -- which you will still likely disagree with, but at least you will be disagreeing with what he said, not what you read.Baloney! No one that I've seen on this board hates America ...
You might want to calm down, take a deep breath, and go back and read what Rev actually wrote, because you obviously went off half-cocked. Then you can respond to what he said -- which you will still likely disagree with, but at least you will be disagreeing with what he said, not what you read.
Forbes, not Fortune. And your selective quotations are disingenuous. The blogger did an excellent job of being "fair and balanced" but, as you have aptly pointed out, comes to this conclusion:Also from the Fortune article
That pretty much destroys any objections you have to this nation being called a "Christian nation" as that terminology applies to the people of this nation and the foundation upon which it was built. You just lost your own argument with that quote. Congratulations."America wasn’t founded as a Christian nation and many of our beloved Forefathers sadly were not, yet America was largely comprised of Believers. Liberty allows us to worship freely or not at all per conscience. America was never meant to be theocratic or homogenous religiously, but Christianity has always been indelible to our social fabric.
"The Founders, even non-Believers, considered that a blessing."
I found nothing inspiring about the video. I don't care what the nation was. I care about what it is... and the only word that comes to my mind is "infanticide". I hope we wouldn't call America Christian when so many babies are being sacrificed to the god of America---the individualistic, materialistic self..... I found the short video quite interesting as well as inspiring. I just wonder what you think of this video, and its premise that this nation was founded and held to Christian principles since its birth?
What say you [only after watching this brief, eye-opening video], but only after you watch the video. Your comments will give you away, should you comment without watching the video to its end! :smilewinkgrin:
http://hawthornephoto.com/walk.htm
I
I am getting sick of right-wing Christians who are proud to be American (ignoring 1 Cor. 1:31) and equating that w/ Christian values. Patriotism does not equal spiritual discipleship. If anything, America has become the empire that the Roman empire became and Revelation polemicized against.
.
Yeah. Dave Barton should be ashamed of himself as well as his followers who have tried to revise American history.
"I found nothing inspiring about the video. I don't care what the nation was. I care about what it is... and the only word that comes to my mind is "infanticide". I hope we wouldn't call America Christian when so many babies are being sacrificed to the god of America---the individualistic, materialistic self.
I am getting sick of right-wing Christians who are proud to be American (ignoring 1 Cor. 1:31) and equating that w/ Christian values. Patriotism does not equal spiritual discipleship. If anything, America has become the empire that the Roman empire became and Revelation polemicized against.
If you are offended... just know I am restraining my true feelings. The rhetoric I would use for the USA is much more harsh but not permitted on this board.
I am getting sick of right-wing Christians who are proud to be American (ignoring 1 Cor. 1:31) and equating that w/ Christian values. Patriotism does not equal spiritual discipleship. If anything, America has become the empire that the Roman empire became and Revelation polemicized against.
At its simplest meaning being patriotic is simply loving one’s country. As long as that love for country does not supersede one’s love for God, and if it is kept in proper perspective, there is absolutely nothing wrong with a Christian being patriotic. I don't believe anyone advocating patriotism or love of the United States is superseding love for God with love for country, or "ignoring 1 Corinthians 1:31." We are looking at Paul's admonition to the Roman church as well as his admonition regarding boasting in the Lord.See, I was trying to be nice - but this attitude that somehow patriotism (of the red, white, and blue variety of course) is somehow akin to godliness is something I have a huge issue with. There is no connection.
I am getting sick of right-wing Christians who are proud to be American (ignoring 1 Cor. 1:31) and equating that w/ Christian values. Patriotism does not equal spiritual discipleship. If anything, America has become the empire that the Roman empire became and Revelation polemicized against.
At its simplest meaning being patriotic is simply loving one’s country. As long as that love for country does not supersede one’s love for God, and if it is kept in proper perspective, there is absolutely nothing wrong with a Christian being patriotic. I don't believe anyone advocating patriotism or love of the United States is superseding love for God with love for ountry, or "ignoring 1 Corinthians 1:31." We are looking at Paul's admonition to the Roman church as well as his admonition regarding boasting in the Lord.
Romans 13, NASBWe as Christians are under obligation to God to be subject to the governing authorities over us by being model citizens, obeying laws, paying taxes. Of course our first responsibility is to be obedient to God. In America, a democratic republic where individual citizens have the ability to change and influence government by voting or by being politically involved when appropriate and in appropriate ways, part of being a good citizen is voting and having whatever positive influence we can on government.
1 Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.
2 Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God ; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves.
3 For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good and you will have praise from the same;
4 for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil.
5 Therefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience' sake.
6 For because of this you also pay taxes, for rulers are servants of God, devoting themselves to this very thing.
7 Render to all what is due them: tax to whom tax is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor.
Our founding fathers who also cherished their faith are the ones who gave us those responsibilities, and even in the face of government that has forgotten from where this nation came relative to the principles of its founders, we are nonetheless as citizens to honor God and that government, while working diligently to change the things about that government we do not like, and we do that because we love God and country.
Forbes, not Fortune. And your selective quotations are disingenuous. The blogger did an excellent job of being "fair and balanced" but, as you have aptly pointed out, comes to this conclusion:That pretty much destroys any objections you have to this nation being called a "Christian nation" as that terminology applies to the people of this nation and the foundation upon which it was built. You just lost your own argument with that quote. Congratulations.
It's amazing you can read "America wasn’t founded as a Christian nation ... " and come to the conclusion Bill Flax said "this is a Christian nation." Unbelievable, in fact.I have no objection to saying there were Christians and Christians influences in the founding of this country, but that is not the same as being a Christian nation. Which is what the Fortune writer was said, especially in the last paragraph.