Attorney General Sessions

[InTheLight]

Again, no support for your opinion and still not actual rebuttal to what I actually posted. Are you just trolling?

No, but you are.

Period? Really? So Sessions could do the worst job ever for a sitting President, and you'll tolerate just because you like him and think he has integrity? This is silly.

 

[Calminian]

No, but you are.

Yes, but you're now defending Jeff Session whom you used to attack. Even accused him on colluding with the Russians.
Trump Fires Comey

And money grabbing.
Jeff Sessions Overreach.

Now he's competent? Let me guess. Sessions and Trump work it out, you'll suddenly have a change of heart... again.

 

[InTheLight]

Yes, but you're now defending Jeff Session whom you used to attack. Even accused him on colluding with the Russians.
Trump Fires Comey

Ha ha. You fail again. I merely said he had contact with the Russians, that being the Russian ambassador. Sessions himself has said this.

And money grabbing.
Jeff Sessions Overreach.

Yep, that's what it seems like to me. Does that mean Sessions is incompetent? Or just a misguided policy? Where do you stand on this policy? For it or against it?

Now he's competent? Let me guess. Sessions and Trump work it out, you'll suddenly have a change of heart... again.

Since I haven't had a change of heart, I can't have another change of heart.

White Nationalists Are Ecstatic About Jeff Sessions’ Nomination

 

[Calminian]

Ha ha. You fail again. I merely said.....

Here we go again. That's not what I said that's not what I meant. I'm done.

 

[carpro]

"Needed" is a strong word. You anti-trumpers and full of emotion and insults, but short on logical rebuttals.

I'm not an "anti Trumper". Not even close.

If he wanted someone as AG that would swear to protect him against all charges like Holder and his replacement did for Obama, Sessions was clearly the wrong guy to begin with. If he wanted someone who would institute and defend his policies, Sessions was a good pick.

The problem here is Trump. Sessions has been a known quantity of years. Trump should have found out all he needed during the vetting process. And I believe he did. But he has changed his mind and is now clearly running scared ahead of the democrat's viscous, and phony, Russian campaign.

He's frustrated and taking it out on Sessions. Whining is not "winning".


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Calminian]

I'm not an "anti Trumper". Not even close.

I agree, but you're still wrong on this and still not responding to my post. Sessions is not above reproach just because he has integrity. He needs to be good at his job and so far he's MIA. I'd like to see him step down and perhaps fulfill a different role. I felt the same about Spicer. I don't think he's cut out for AG in this day and age.

If he wanted someone who would institute and defend his policies, Sessions was a good pick.

How is allowing all this nonsense good for Trump's policies?

The problem here is Trump. ....now clearly running scared ahead of the democrat's viscous, and phony, Russian campaign.

Nonsense. Trump is just tired of the lies, just as most of us are.

Whining is not "winning".

LOL! Now you're quoting CNN.

 

[carpro]

LOL! Now you're quoting CNN.

I wouldn't know. I never watch or read anything they put out.

But, if you're telling the truth, they got one thing right.[emoji106]



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Calminian]

I wouldn't know. I never watch or read anything they put out.

But, if you're telling the truth, they got one thing right.[emoji106]

OM Gosh, the whining comment? You really have never heard that from the MSM? It's practically their mantra! I see it's now yours as well.

But tell ya what. If Trump's very timely tweets light a fire under Mr. Sessions behind (as it seems to be doing), we'll all be thanking him. It certainly brought this issue into focus.

 

[InTheLight]

But tell ya what. If Trump's very timely tweets lite a fire under Mr. Sessions behind (as it seems to be doing), we'll all be thanking him. It certainly brought him into focus.

Exactly what is Sessions doing that is incompetent?

Or, what isn't he doing that he needs a fire lit under him?

 

[carpro]

OM Gosh, the whining comment? You really have never heard that from the MSM? It's practically their mantra! I see it's now yours as well.

.

To the contrary , you don't see much at all. At least not clearly. And here's why...

I've been slow recognizing that you're not a Trump supporter at all.

You're a Trump sycophant. Big difference.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Calminian]

Exactly what is Sessions doing that is incompetent?

Or, what isn't he doing that he needs a fire lit under him?

I would recommend Lou Dobbs to you (If you haven't boycotted him like Breitbart). He's right on the money and has been criticizing Session for months.

Then again, you support the Russia probe, so I doubt I'll convince you.

 

[InTheLight]

I would recommend Lou Dobbs to you (If you haven't boycotted him like Breitbart). He's right on the money and has been criticizing Session for months.

Then again, you support the Russia probe, so I doubt I'll convince you.

How about just telling me in your own words how Sessions is failing.

 

[Calminian]

....You're a Trump sycophant. ....

You're clearly in insult mode. I'll not return the favor.

 

[Calminian]

How about just telling me in your own words how Sessions is failing.

Already have: "Russia Probe"

Something you have wholehearted supported.

 

[Reynolds]

Exactly what is Sessions doing that is incompetent?

Or, what isn't he doing that he needs a fire lit under him?

1. He should prosecute Hillary.
2. He should put his big boy pants on and do his job in the Russia investigation.
3. He should prosecute former FBI director.

 

[InTheLight]

Already have: "Russia Probe"

Something you have wholehearted supported.

Russia probe? I'm not understanding what you are saying. Please elaborate.

 

[InTheLight]

1. He should prosecute Hillary.

But Trump said he wasn't going to go after Hillary. Should Sessions go against his bosses wishes and go after Hillary?

2. He should put his big boy pants on and do his job in the Russia investigation.

So you favor an investigation into possible Russian connections with Trump campaign officials?

3. He should prosecute former FBI director.

For what? Allegedly leaking classified information?

 

[carpro]

You're clearly in insult mode. I'll not return the favor.

[emoji23]


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Calminian]

1. He should prosecute Hillary.
2. He should put his big boy pants on and do his job in the Russia investigation.
3. He should prosecute former FBI director.

The Russia thing is a blunder that warrants firing IMO. I don't how what session fixes it.

But he may actually do the others now that Trump is turning up the heat. In hindsight everyone's going to admit, the tweets worked.... again.

 

[Reynolds]

But Trump said he wasn't going to go after Hillary. Should Sessions go against his bosses wishes and go after Hillary?



So you favor an investigation into possible Russian connections with Trump campaign officials?



For what? Allegedly leaking classified information?

Yes, yes, and yes.