Amy.G said:
Mr. Salamander! I know that you are KJVO. Would you care to answer my question, please. I'm tired of being ignored.

Here it is, posted way back in this thread.
I have found the KJB to be in complete harmony within itsself, although some supposed discrepencies have been suggested.
In that area I have found a simple explanation to satisfy any honest person who approaches this issue with the right motive.
The Geneva Bible had only a few places where it took certain Scriptures and applied them in error as to inherit the nickname "The Bishop's Bible".
Many will take this to a lower level and make insidious accusations against King James and the translators of the KJB as if they were out to honour the man and not God.
They will also attack those who hold to the KJB using the Letter to the Reader by taking thier statements out of context.
All the "evidences" used to try and discredit the KJB I have found to be invalid. This happens usually because a use of a corrupt interpretation of the Greek or at least a limited definition of the terms to attempt to discredit the KJB.
All the issues began before the giving of the New Testament in the differing of Rabbinic order.
Even the Jews tend to stick with only one interpretation given by a certain order originating from one specific rabbi. This is comparable to the issues regarded as a concern and known as Alexandrian and Byzantine MSS.
What we who are called "KJVO", and that usually applied as a derogatory term, hold to the Veracity of the Scriptures, The Harmony of its content, Contextual agreement, The Preservation by the Scribes and what we refer to as The Received Texts as those tetxts which have never been found to disagree with one another, etc, etc, etc. And many, many more valid reasons.:godisgood:
What will be soon to happen is my statements called into question, and that usually comes from the same origin as those infamous words, "Yeah, hath God said?"
The arguement goes from the modernists that "no doctrines are changed", BUT! those doctrines are most certainly effected by the limitedness and alterations they introduce to the thought intent.
Amd like the all too popular words of a Sonny and Cher 1960's pop-rock song, "And The Beat Goes On..........":wavey: