Getting back to the OP, I want to address this to Awaken:
Being a church historian, I'll put forth the following: There are three distinct groupings of denominations who teach a separate Holy Spirit baptism, apart from conversion: The group to whose beliefs you adhere, call them the "Baptist Pentecostals/Charismatics", because they were influenced by and largely came out of Baptist backgrounds; this includes groups such as the Assembly of God, which our member here, Yeshua, was a part of. This group believes in two distinct and separate "works of grace": conversion and a later HS baptism evidenced by speaking in tongues. These are "two experience" or "second blessing/tongues" Pentecostals.
Then there are the "three experience" or "three blessing/tongues" Pentecostals represented by such groups as the Church of God headquartered in Cleveland, TN. This group was influenced by and came out of the Wesleyan/Methodist/Holiness churches, and thus they believe in three distinct and separate works of grace: conversion, then later an instantaneous entire sanctification, and then finally HS baptism with evidence of tongues. This group believes explicitly that the HS baptism evidenced by tongues CANNOT occur unless one has first experienced entire sanctification with the heart made pure by cleansing from all inbred original sin. The Assembly of God, on the other hand, denies this, coming from a Baptist background, and holding that sanctification is progressive and NOT an instantaneous second blessing or work of grace.
Then there are the Holiness bodies, represented by the Church of the Nazarene, the Salvation Army, and the Church of God (Anderson, Indiana), which believe in two distinct and separate works of grace: conversion and then later an instantaneous entire sanctification in which the heart is made pure by cleansing from all inbred original sin. Now these groups call this second blessing or work of grace the baptism of the Holy Spirit, but here is the interesting part: they explicitly deny the speaking in tongues! In fact, early on, the Church of the Nazarene was called "The Pentecostal Church of the Nazarene", but they dropped the word "Pentecostal" from their name so as not to make people think they affirmed speaking in tongues, which they explicitly disavowed and still do to this day!
So, which of these groups is correct in their definition of the Holy Spirit baptism: The Assembly of God which believes in two works of grace: conversion and later HS baptism with evidence of tongues; the Church of God (Cleveland, TN), which believes three works of grace: conversion, later instantaneous entire sanctification, and still later HS baptism with evidence of tongues; or the Church of the Nazarene which believes in two works of grace: conversion, and later HS baptism which they equate to instantaneous entire sanctification?
Which is right? They can't all be right. And yet each group claims to base their beliefs on scripture. You belong to the first group. How do you know that your group is right and the other two are wrong?