Bob Alkire
New Member
Got a link to that?
Here is something I found today.
http://gma.yahoo.com/trayvon-martin-shooter-told-cops-teenager-went-gun-030349812--abc-news.html
This said there was a teenage witness that saw it.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Got a link to that?
No, let's not. I trust the kid with the Skittles. Unfortunately, he can't speak anymore. I sure wish more people would stand up and help speak for him than I'm seeing. There's a lot, but there certainly should be more. Anyone with an ounce of decency and common sense should be speaking for him.
Here's a link with a petition to sign for Trayvon: http://www.change.org
Okay, for those defending Zimmerman, first off he's half white, half-hispanic. And? Why are people using that to say he isn't racist? Some having Hispanic blood in you somehow make you immune to stupidity?
Doesn't change what you can clearly hear on the 911 calls if you listened to them.
1. That Zimmerman followed this boy AFTER 911 operators advised him not too. When someone follows you at night, do you stop for a friendly hello or do you get out of dodge?! I'd be getting far and away as fast as I could.
2. That Zimmerman continued being the aggressor and said "they always get away" and "f**king coons."
3. That Zimmerman shot this kid and now he's dead.
4. That this kid is screaming for HELP. How many criminals scream for help? His mother confirms this is her son screaming for help and asking "why?" on the tape. A mother knows her son's voice. When you listen to that particular call, the screams abruptly stop. It is horrible to hear.
5. The girlfriend is on the phone with him and he tells her what is happening. Her testimony backs up that Trayvon was being followed, not that he was being the aggressor.
There's this flood of evidence that tells the majority of the story. There's now enough evidence to make anyone with common sense say something stinks to high heaven about Zimmerman being free right now.
The only other person who could add anything right now would be Zimmerman and personally? Whatever he has to say right now wouldn't mean much after hearing him make that despicable racial slur, after hearing him continue to follow the kids against advice and while KNOWING police were on their way, after hearing a kid scream for his life and hearing Zimmerman's gun go off and KILL him, yet let's trust Zimmerman?
No, let's not. I trust the kid with the Skittles. Unfortunately, he can't speak anymore. I sure wish more people would stand up and help speak for him than I'm seeing. There's a lot, but there certainly should be more. Anyone with an ounce of decency and common sense should be speaking for him.
Again, here's the link: http://www.change.org
Read today the one screaming help was Zimmerman, NOT Trayvon...and the only eyewitness to this confirmed it. The back of Zimmermans head was split open and he also had a broken nose, quite interesrting if these "facts" you support are true. Without knowing all of the facts in this investigation, signing any petition demanding his arrest is pure ignorance.
If someone attacks you, do you fight back?
That begs the question, who did the attacking? Zimmerman and the witness said a man in a red sweater was on the bottom calling for help.
Yes, and I can see in a scuffle that the boy would not always be on the ground but instead would be actively working to protect himself. I heard the scream - it certainly didn't sound like the scream of an almost 30 year old man. It sounded much younger.
how do you know how major and how minor his injuries were, were you there?The back of his head was split open? Really? Usually when one's head is split open, it requires medical care. The split open head wound? It was so minor that it was already healing by the time it was looked at and required no stitches.
purely ignorant comments. Do you know what its like to be attacked?That's generally called a scrape or a scratch. It initially went from a bloody nose and a scratch to blunt force trauma, broken nose, numerous cuts. It's a wonder the guy was able to get the gun out of his waistband like he said he did, what with all that trauma and him claiming to be on the ground getting pounded to a pulp. (btw, he refused medical treatment that night)
ahhh...I see, it was the racial slur that seals his guilt. We can stop waiting for the investicating to be complete, we have a slur folks. Call the "reverends" (oh wait...)A domestic violence complaint, resisting arrest with violence, now someone is dead at his hands. AFTER he was advised not to follow, AFTER he did so anyhow. AFTER you can hear him on the tape using a major racial slur.
here you see the clear bias. "Numerous adults"?! Contradicting what these numerous adults said?! Just maybe these numerous adults contradicted what this alleged eyewitness (the only one besides Zimmerman) SAW!Matt, yes, there is supposed to be a 13 year old who ended up going forward as an eye witness and either contracicting what the numerous adults believe they heard or it could just be adding the kid defending himself before he got shot, if it's true. Here is that link: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-witness-claims-trayvon-martin-attacked-george-zimmerman/
Its sickening that over 2 million sheeple want Zimmerman arrested due SOLELY what has been reported by the media, which we know ceased being unbiased decades ago. So much for due process in this country...and for it's demise to be supported by believers! :tear:
its amazing the care and difficulting that went into the due process in the OJ trial...now when the victims are reversed, who cares! String him up!
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
I know I have asked this before, but whatever difference should the colour of either the gunman's or the youth's skin make? If the CNN report is correct (and I have no way of judging that), I just cannot see why the gunman should be considered either more guilty or less guilty if he had black skin and the youth had white, or if both had black skin, or both white.
Demanding his arrest is due process?Here is the fifth amendment that talks about due process:
These two million plus people are BEGGING for due process. Yes, there are some saying string him up now, shoot him now, but the majority are begging for due process of law because a young person was deprived of his right to life and the surrounding circumstances do not support the idea that anyone had the right to take that from him.
I fully support it. Do you?