• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Blacks Must Confront Reality

Status
Not open for further replies.

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_3_black_family.html


KAY S. HYMOWITZ


The Black Family: 40 Years of Lies
Rejecting the Moynihan report caused untold, needless misery.



Read through the megazillion words on class, income mobility, and poverty in the recent New York Times series “Class Matters” and you still won’t grasp two of the most basic truths on the subject: 1. entrenched, multigenerational poverty is largely black; and 2. it is intricately intertwined with the collapse of the nuclear family in the inner city.

By now, these facts shouldn’t be hard to grasp. Almost 70 percent of black children are born to single mothers. Those mothers are far more likely than married mothers to be poor, even after a post-welfare-reform decline in child poverty. They are also more likely to pass that poverty on to their children. Sophisticates often try to dodge the implications of this bleak reality by shrugging that single motherhood is an inescapable fact of modern life, affecting everyone from the bobo Murphy Browns to the ghetto “baby mamas.” Not so; it is a largely low-income—and disproportionately black—phenomenon. The vast majority of higher-income women wait to have their children until they are married. The truth is that we are now a two-family nation, separate and unequal—one thriving and intact, and the other struggling, broken, and far too often African-American.


15 years after the Moynihan report:


Indeed, by 1980, 15 years after “The Negro Family,” the out-of-wedlock birthrate among blacks had more than doubled, to 56 percent. In the ghetto, that number was considerably higher, as high as 66 percent in New York City. Many experts comforted themselves by pointing out that white mothers were also beginning to forgo marriage, but the truth was that only 9 percent of white births occurred out of wedlock.

And how was the black single-parent family doing? It would be fair to say that it had not been exhibiting the strengths of kinship networks. According to numbers crunched by Moynihan and economist Paul Offner, of the black children born between 1967 and 1969, 72 percent received Aid to Families with Dependent Children before the age of 18. School dropout rates, delinquency, and crime, among the other dysfunctions that Moynihan had warned about, were rising in the cities. In short, the 15 years since the report was written had witnessed both the birth of millions of fatherless babies and the entrenchment of an underclass.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This hyper focus on race and blaming the white man for the ills of others is nothing but marxism at its finest.


From its inception, the United States was built on racism. From the displacement and near genocide of Native Americans, to the enslavement of African Americans, to the theft of huge sections of Mexico, to the racist exclusion of Asian and Pacific Islander immigrants, to the current xenophobic hysteria against Arabs and South Asians, racism has been a convenient tool for the maintenance of power and super-profits by the ruling class at the expense of oppressed people and all workers.


http://www.cpusa.org/party-program/#3d
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This hyper focus on race and blaming the white man for the ills of others is nothing but marxism at its finest.

And Marx was a white boy.

So not only did white boys bring slavery to America, put the Native Americans on reservations, create the Trail of Tears, etc., etc., etc. but also brought Communism into being.

Not a pretty history. Right Rev?
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And Marx was a white boy.

So not only did white boys bring slavery to America, put the Native Americans on reservations, create the Trail of Tears, etc., etc., etc. but also brought Communism into being.

Not a pretty history. Right Rev?

Marx was also a socialistic Ruskie. Kind of like your man in the WH, huh? But, your man is black. Socialistic Ruskies come in all colors.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Marx was also a socialistic Ruskie. Kind of like your man in the WH, huh? But, your man is black. Socialistic Ruskies come in all colors.

ROFL. Sorry, but your ignorance is such a hoot.

Marx was German.

Engles was also German. You do know about Engles, don't you?

And you lie about Obama. We all know why you really do not like him.

As I have asked in the past show me which of the tenets of Communism he has tried to impose on America? Do so and you will prove your point. But you can't because he has not done so.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A few more for Rev and his rant.

Wasn't it white boys who:

passed separate but equal laws?
pass Jim Crow laws?
imprisoned legal American-Japanese citizens?
fought tooth and nail against equal rights for all?
included the three-fifths clause in the constitution?
took Native-American children away from their parents and shipped them to schools far away from home?
broke every treaty they signed with the Native-American tribes?

Man the list could go on and on.

All this is history whether you like it or not.

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. George Santayana
 

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So you are saying that Japanese residents of the US who were not citizens of the US, were not imprisoned?

No, he didn't say that at all and I think you know that. The U.S. was pretty indiscriminate about determining the difference between the two.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
ROFL. Sorry, but your ignorance is such a hoot.

Marx was German.

Engles was also German. You do know about Engles, don't you?

And you lie about Obama. We all know why you really do not like him.

As I have asked in the past show me which of the tenets of Communism he has tried to impose on America? Do so and you will prove your point. But you can't because he has not done so.

Depends on your view of Communism, that of theory or that as practiced by all Communist countries: Soviet Union, China, Cuba, Yugoslavia, The Balkans, Poland! And now Russia under Putin!

All these were dictatorial states. That is exactly how the Marxist Obama is trying to rule this country. He bragged he was going to fundamentally change this country and he has, for the worse.

You are a Marxist Crabbie and I don't mean a theoretical one, I mean one just like the Communist rulers of every Communist country. One just like Obama! The motto of some Communists was "You can't make an omelet without breaking eggs". The motto of the democrat party seems to be "We can't control the country without slaughtering the unborn child".
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
And Marx was a white boy.

So not only did white boys bring slavery to America, put the Native Americans on reservations, create the Trail of Tears, etc., etc., etc. but also brought Communism into being.

Not a pretty history. Right Rev?

You do hate white people don't you crabby! Except the Marxist type!
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
A few more for Rev and his rant.

Wasn't it white boys who:

passed separate but equal laws?
pass Jim Crow laws?
imprisoned legal American-Japanese citizens?
fought tooth and nail against equal rights for all?
included the three-fifths clause in the constitution?
took Native-American children away from their parents and shipped them to schools far away from home?
broke every treaty they signed with the Native-American tribes?

Man the list could go on and on.

All this is history whether you like it or not.



passed separate but equal laws? Passed by democrats.

pass Jim Crow laws? Passed by democrats.

imprisoned legal American-Japanese citizens? Ordered by the democrat Roosevelt.

fought tooth and nail against equal rights for all? Policy of democrats.

included the three-fifths clause in the constitution? There is no three fifths law in the Constitution.

took Native-American children away from their parents and shipped them to schools far away from home? Slaughter of the unborn celebrated by the democrats is far, far worse!.

broke every treaty they signed with the Native-American tribes? So says Crabbie the historian, Crabbie the advocate of the slaughter of the unborn child.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is open season on white men and Christians in this country. This is all part of a larger agenda to tear down the founding principles of this country to move it toward marxism.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
It is open season on white men and Christians in this country. This is all part of a larger agenda to tear down the founding principles of this country to move it toward marxism.

I am afraid you are correct. I am also afraid that Obama is a Muslim masquerading as a, dare I say it, "Christian"! Some of his remarks regarding Islam and Christianity show where his loyalties are!
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
passed separate but equal laws? Passed by democrats.

pass Jim Crow laws? Passed by democrats.

imprisoned legal American-Japanese citizens? Ordered by the democrat Roosevelt.

fought tooth and nail against equal rights for all? Policy of democrats.

And they were white men.

included the three-fifths clause in the constitution? There is no three fifths law in the Constitution.

Not now, but there was in the original Constitution and it was insisted on by Southern White men.

the Three-fifths Compromise was enacted. Delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia that year accepted a plan offered by James Madison determining a state's representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. The issue of how to count slaves split the delegates into two groups.

https://www.google.com/search?q=thr...57.3878j0j1&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8


took Native-American children away from their parents and shipped them to schools far away from home? Slaughter of the unborn celebrated by the democrats is far, far worse!.

broke every treaty they signed with the Native-American tribes? So says Crabbie the historian, Crabbie the advocate of the slaughter of the unborn child.

And you unashamedly lie again.
 

Sapper Woody

Well-Known Member
A few more for Rev and his rant.





Wasn't it white boys who:





passed separate but equal laws?


pass Jim Crow laws?


imprisoned legal American-Japanese citizens?


fought tooth and nail against equal rights for all?


included the three-fifths clause in the constitution?


took Native-American children away from their parents and shipped them to schools far away from home?


broke every treaty they signed with the Native-American tribes?





Man the list could go on and on.





All this is history whether you like it or not.











The problem with everything you just said is that there were white people opposing all that as well. To hold all white people accountable for those is the same as holding all black people accountable for the race riots going on right now.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
No, he didn't say that at all and I think you know that. The U.S. was pretty indiscriminate about determining the difference between the two.

That is exactly what he said - didn't you see the quote? If I change any part of a quote, I always indicate. Or could it be he made an incorrect statement?
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
And you unashamedly lie again. [/SIZE]


I don't lie crabbie. You are just afraid if you 'fess up' that you are in favor of the slaughter of unborn children, just as PJ was, you will be prevented from spreading your Marxist propaganda!

Are you a member of SPCA crabby? Do you eat baby beef or veal crabbie? I bet you don't even eat fish eggs!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top