Yes. It may serve to slow the illegal immigration of Guatemalans illegally entering Mexico and traveling north to illegally enter the US. If they know entering the US illegally will be much harder.
Yeah, but if they weigh that against what they are losing it may not seem so beneficial.
The present 700 miles varies from 10 feet in low traffic areas to 25 feet in high traffic areas.
First of all, that ain’t a wall, it is a fence. It may be a deterrence but someone like me would simply go to the “low traffic area” and with an 18” step just jump up and pull myself over, in my younger days wouldn’t even need the step.
Again not good enough, give me a $10 shovel and a couple gallons of water and I’d dig under that in the middle of summer in a day.
1993. The additions mandated by The Secure Fence Act of 2006 started in 2007.
Again I’m thinking more in line about a real wall, not a fence. Trump’s going to have to scrap that mess.
It began in 1993 around the established border crossings. The 2006 law expanded that to include the gaps between the border crossings.
I’m getting the feeling if I asked you for shoes for Christmas and placed a picture of some
Ostrich Cowboy Boots (…size 9 ½
) in front of you I might want to consider myself lucky to get a pair of one-size-fits-all Flip-flops. Nah, I don’t believe you’re thinking bigly enough, Trump’s taste and pride in building will most likely mandate a serious remodel from a fence to a “wall”.
Might be considered a wee bit extreme...
The protected wetlands along the Rio Bravo. Lease land from Mexico to build the fence on the Mexican side.
Agree, although I think the regulations in large part will be abolished. I don’t like ongoing bills for things I don’t own so I don’t like leases, I expect Trump feels the same, but working something out where putting the wall right on the line isn’t practical should be an option.