• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Children who die

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Go through the entire book...
Oh, I'm quite familiar with Hebrews. When I was first getting serious about my faith more than 30 years ago, I spent quite a bit of time in Hebrews because it helped me make sense of the whole Exodus story. It is also exceptionally doctrinally dense.

Moreover, I have been reading it at least once a day for the last month in preparation for the "Hebrews Initiative" that I am participating in beginning in a few weeks. I have spent much of my time thinking about the argument made in Hebrews - one thing follows on another. You can't just pick out proof texts and expect that you will understand it without reading everything before - as well as the multiple texts it references and quotes.

...these 'falling away' are described as brethren...
The author is writing to Jewish persons. Those who are addressed are of the same physical lineage, so they are brothers and sisters. They are not necessarily brothers or sisters in Christ.

...partakers of the Holy Spirit...
This is a difficult phrase because we often associate it with the meanings in the Pauline epistles instead of what may be a very specific contextual meaning here. In the Exodus, all of the children of Israel participated in the events leading to their freedom from Egypt, the crossing of the Sea, the miraculous water and food in the wilderness, and the constant manifestation of God. Yet many refused to trust God. The comparison being made here may well refer to the working of the Holy Spirit in the life of a person before they take the meaningful step of faith into the Kingdom. Since the author of Hebrews is using an enormous amount of Jewish imagery, it could also be a comparison to the water provided by God in the desert (water imagery is sometimes used in scripture - think Isaiah and the illustration of "living water" in Jesus' teaching). This interpretation would go well with the next phrase:

...tasted the good word of God...
This could be a comparison to the manna (that tasted like honey, see Exodus 16:31) in the wilderness. The scripture (aka word of God) has a precedent as being something tasted (Ezekiel 3:3 "eat this scroll"; Jeremiah 15:16 "sweet as honey in my mouth"; Revelation 10:9-10 "sweet as honey")

In other words, these persons had taken the word into themselves - they had consumed the message.

...received the knowledge of the truth...
This could very well parallel the receiving of the Law.

sanctified by the blood of the covenant, the LORD's people.
And the tabernacle worship.

They entered not into His rest because of unbelief. Even Moses and Aaron were refused entrance into the land because of their unbelief.
Yet they did not enter into rest.

This interpretation follows the Exodus and wildness journey - chronologically - up to the point where they rebel.

Do you see the development of the theme of the children of Israel who had every reason to trust God, but didn't?

Moreover, if we claim that these people are true believers who somehow work their way out of God's transforming work which contradicts all kinds of teaching about the perseverance of the saints.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
....Moreover, if we claim that these people are true believers...

Where do you find that distinction of 'true believers' in the NT? Where in the scriptures does it say that [1] His redeemed, born from above children cannot commit the sin of unbelief, or [2] that Christ's atonement does not cover the sin of unbelief? I say both these notions are wrong.

Hard times fell upon these Jewish Christians and they fell away/turned back in their hearts unto Egypt just as their forefathers in the type did, and just as Christ prophesied that some would. You judge them to be children of the devil. I cannot/will not do that.

[add]

...and that's quite some gymnastics there in your last post, all in an attempt to disprove what the text describes them as, i.e., brethren, partakers of the Holy Spirit, tasted the good word of God, received the knowledge of the truth, sanctified by the blood of the covenant, the LORD's people.

29 of how much sorer punishment, think ye, shall he be judged worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?

That is NOT referring to the old sacrificial system or to the temple worship.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
In the Shadow of Death–The Little Ones Are Safe With Jesus

Not who you addressed the question to but I will answer.
1. None
2. Yes

My husband and I disagree on this topic, but I do believe that babies that are miscarried, aborted, or die very young, before they can understand, sin righteousness and judgment, go to heaven. I don't say this because I think that is fair, as I acknowledge that fair is for all to end in hell. But I say that because God is merciful.
Our old pastor, also reformed, believed that all children that die very young, and in the womb are elect.

I see you edited your post to add one more question but that question is specific for Evan so I will leave it for him. :)

Another Baptist and I had a "more than spirited discussion" regarding the fate of those who die in infancy on the DOG forum! I presented an article by Al Mohler with which I agree and which I have presented on this forum in the past {http://www.albertmohler.com/2005/01/05/in-the-shadow-of-death-the-little-ones-are-safe-with-jesus/}. Part of Mohler's argument is as follows:

WEDNESDAY • January 5, 2005

In the Shadow of Death–The Little Ones Are Safe With Jesus

The photographs and images are now seared into our consciousness. One of the most troubling aspects of the disaster in South Asia is the death of infants and young children. Moving at the speed of a jetliner, the walls of water fell on the young and the old alike–and so many of the youngest were simply swept away.
The death of the little ones poses anguished questions that reach to the depth of Christian faith. What happened to these young victims after death? Did they go to Heaven or to Hell?

That question is too pastorally loaded to be left hanging, only to be found at the end of this article. I am convinced that those who die in infancy and early childhood–along with the severely cognitively impaired–go to Heaven when they die. That is quite a claim, but it stands within the mainstream of orthodox Christian theology throughout the centuries, and I believe it is biblically and theologically sustainable.

In fact, I am hard pressed to imagine how any other answer can be given.
This is a question of emotional urgency for grieving parents, and it is a stone of stumbling for some who jump to hasty theological conclusions. The scope of the problem is huge, for untold millions of human beings have died at the earliest ages. Infant mortality still stands at several million babies a year. In the developing world, disease, famine, and abandonment take a heavy toll. Even in the most highly developed nations, armed with the latest medical technologies, thousands of infants die each year.

The best estimates out of Indonesia and Sri Lanka indicate that young children make up a disproportionate number of the victims of the tsunamis. Like Rachel in the Old Testament, anguished mothers weep for their children.

What is our answer to the question of the eternal destiny awaiting those children? My argument that these children are safe in the presence of Jesus Christ is based upon biblical evidence and theological reasoning. I cannot accept the glib and superficial assertions put forth by those who would simply offer assurance without adequate argument.

These infants are in Heaven, but not because they were not sinners. The Bible teaches that we are all conceived in sin and born in sin, and each of us is a sinner from the moment we draw our first breath. The doctrines of original sin and total depravity do not spring from some speculative theological imagination, but from the clear teaching of Scripture. There is no state of innocence, and these babies cannot enter Heaven unless the penalty for their sin is provided by the atonement of Jesus Christ.

These infants are in Heaven, but not because everyone is in Heaven. The Bible presents us with a stark picture of two destinies for humankind. Those who are in Christ, who have been redeemed by the blood of the Lamb, will be in Heaven. Those who are apart from Christ will be in Hell. Hell may be a despised concept–rejected by the theological modernizers–but it will not disappear, and its horrors await those who die without Christ. Jesus warned sinners to fear Hell, and the Bible warns that we must flee the wrath that is to come. Universalism is just not an option for any Christian who believes the Bible. Those who deny Hell deny the authority of Christ.

These infants are in heaven, but not because any of them were baptized. The practice of infant baptism has led to multiple theological confusions, and the death of infants is often one of the points of greatest bewilderment. Most of the early church fathers simply assumed that baptized infants who die in infancy go to Heaven, while unbaptized infants do not. These significant Christian leaders and thinkers, including figures such as Ambrose of Milan and Augustine of Hippo, taught the doctrine of baptismal regeneration–a belief still held by the Roman Catholic Church and most Eastern Orthodox churches. Among Protestants, Lutherans hold to a form of baptismal regeneration and some sacramentalists in other denominations also lean in that direction. According to this logic, infants are saved because they have been baptized and have thus received the gift of salvation. There is simply not a shred of biblical support for this argument. What these churches call infant baptism cannot help us in framing our argument. There is no biblical foundation for arguing for the salvation of infants from baptism, or for positing the existence of “Limbo” as a place of eternal suspension for unbaptized infants.

So, how can we frame an argument that is true to Scripture and consistent with the Gospel? Before turning to Heaven, perhaps we should take a closer look at Hell. According to the Bible, Hell is a place of punishment for sins consciously committed during our earthly lives. We are told that we will be judged according to our deeds committed “in the body.” [2 Corinthians 5:10] Adam’s sin and guilt, imputed to every single human being, explains why we are born as sinners and why we cannot not sin, but the Bible clearly teaches that every person will be judged for his or her own sins, not for Adam’s sin. The judgment of sinners that will take place at the great white throne [Revelation 20:11-12] will be “according to their deeds.” Have those who died in infancy committed such deeds? I believe not, for they have not yet developed the capacity to know good from evil. No biblical text refers to the presence of small children or infants in Hell–not one.
Theologians have long debated an “age of accountability.” The Bible does not reveal an “age” at which moral accountability arrives, but we do know by observation and experience that maturing human beings do develop a capacity for moral reasoning at some point. Dismissing the idea of an “age” of accountability, John MacArthur refers to a “condition” of accountability. I most often speak of a point or capacity of moral accountability. At this point of moral development, the maturing child knows the difference between good and evil–and willingly chooses to sin.

The Bible offers a fascinating portrait of this truth in the first chapter of Deuteronomy. In response to Israel’s sin and rebellion, God condemns that generation of adults to death in the wilderness, never to see the land of promise. “Not one of these men, this evil generation, shall see the good land which I swore to give to your fathers.” [Deuteronomy 1:35]. But God specifically exempted young children and infants from this condemnation–and He even explained why He did so: “Moreover, your little ones who you said would become prey, and your sons, who this day have no knowledge of good and evil, shall enter there, and I will give it to them and they shall possess it.” [Deuteronomy 1:39] These little ones were not punished for their parents’ sins, but were accepted by God into the Promised Land. I believe that this offers a sound basis for our confidence that God deals with young children differently than He deals with those who are capable of deliberate and conscious sin.

Based on these arguments, I believe that we can have confidence that God receives all infants into Heaven.

Salvation is all of grace, and God remains forever sovereign in the entire process of our salvation. The Bible clearly teaches the doctrine of election, but it nowhere suggests that all those who die in infancy are not among the elect. Even the Westminster Confession, the most authoritative Reformed confession, states the matter only in the positive sense, affirming that all elect infants are received into Heaven. It does not require belief in the existence of any non-elect infants. Those who insist that all we can say is that elect infants are saved while non-elect infants are not, confuse the issue by assuming or presuming the existence of non-elect infants and leaving the matter there.

//snip//

Keep those words firmly in mind as you contemplate this great and often troubling question. The little ones are safe with Jesus.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mohler makes a true assessment, we're all going to be judged by our deeds done in the body. Not sure about his application, to children that die, of 'the second generation' that entered the promised land, which incidentally is NOT a type of heaven.

It is consistent throughout the scriptures that it's actually the second born that obtains the favor of God, not the firstborn, i.e., Cain/Abel, Shem/Japheth, Ishmael/Isaac, Essau/Jacob, Leah/Rachel, Mannassah/Ephraim, First/Second Wilderness Generations, Saul/David, First Covenant/Second Covenant, First Man Adam/Second Adam (and doubtless many others):

It was not Cain's sacrifice that God had respect for, but it was Abel's; 'Cain was of the evil one, and slew his brother....Because his works were evil, and his brother`s righteous.' [1 Jn 3:12]

Shem was the elder brother of Japheth, but, 'God enlarge Japheth, And let him dwell in the tents of Shem...' [Gen 10:21 ASV & 9:27]

It was Ishmael, the firstborn, that was born after the flesh, and he persecuted Isaac, the second born, that was born after the Spirit. Isaac was the child of promise; Ishmael was cast out. [Gal 4:29]

It was said of Esau and Jacob, 'The elder shall serve the younger. Even as it is written, Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.' [Ro 9:12,13]

It was not Leah his first wife that Jacob loved, but it was Rachel his second wife. [Gen 29:30,31]

It was Ephraim the younger that Jacob blessed over his older brother Mannassah and in spite of Joseph's objections. [Gen 48:13-20]

It was not the first generation of the exodus that entered into the rest of the promised land, it was the second generation; 'But your little ones, that ye said should be a prey, them will I bring in, and they shall know the land which ye have rejected.' [Nu 14:31]

It was not Saul the first king of Israel that would do all of God's will, but it was the second king David that was a man after His heart; '...Saul the son of Kish...when he had removed him, he raised up David to be their king; to whom also he bare witness and said, I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after My heart, who shall do all My will.' [Acts 13:21,22]

It was not the first covenant of the law ( I desire mercy, and not sacrifice) that God had pleasure in, but it was the second covenant of grace; '....a better covenant, which hath been enacted upon better promises. For if that first covenant had been faultless, then would no place have been sought for a second.' [Heb 8:6,7]

Consider 'the first man Adam' vs. 'the last Adam, ' ... that is not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; then that which is spiritual. The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is of heaven.' [1 Cor 15:45-47]
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
And then there is this: {http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1245734/posts}

Most Calvinists whole-heartedly affirm that all persons dying in infancy are saved, even though they acknowledge the Bible has no definitive doctrine on this subject. Some Calvinists will go only so far as to acknowledge that the Bible definitely teaches that at least some persons dying in infancy are saved. But no representative Calvinist theologian declares that any person dying in infancy is damned.

Arminians nevertheless deliberately misrepresent Calvinists as believing persons dying in infancy are damned. Let the following quotations from some of the most renown Calvinists suffice to show that the Arminian accusation is false.

John Calvin, the sixteenth-century Reformer for whom Calvinism is named, asserted, "I do not doubt that the infants whom the Lord gathers together from this life are regenerated by a secret operation of the Holy Ghost." And "he speaks of the exemption of infants from the grace of salvation 'as an idea not free from execrable blasphemy'" (cited by Augustus Strong in Systematic Theology). He furthermore declared that "to say that the countless mortals taken from life while yet infants are precipitated from their mothers' arms into eternal death is a blasphemy to be universally detested" (quoted in Presbyterian and Reformed Review, Oct. 1890: pp.634-51).

Charles Hodge was a 19th-century professor of theology at Princeton Seminary, which was in those days a foremost American bastion of Calvinism. He wrote: "All who die in infancy are saved. This is inferred from what the Bible teaches of the analogy between Adam and Christ. 'As by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.' (Rom. v.18,19.) We have no right to put any limit on these general terms, except what the Bible itself places upon them. The Scriptures nowhere exclude any class of infants, baptized or unbaptized, born in Christian or in heathen lands, of believing or unbelieving parents, from the benefits of the redemption of Christ. All the descendants of Adam, except Christ, are under condemnation; all the descendants of Adam, except those of whom it is expressly revealed that they cannot inherit the kingdom of God, are saved. This appears to be the clear meaning of the Apostle, and therefore he does not hesitate to say that where sin abounded, grace has much more abounded, that the benefits of redemption far exceed the evils of the fall; that the number of the saved far exceeds the number of the lost" (Systematic Theology, vol.I, p.26)

John Newton, author of the favorite hymn "Amazing Grace," became a Calvinistic Anglican minister in 1764, serving the English parishes in Olney, Buckinghamshire, and London. In a letter to a friend he wrote, "Nor can I doubt, in my private judgment, that [infants] are included in the election of grace. Perhaps those who die in infancy, are the exceeding great multitude of all people, nations, and languages mentioned, Revelations, vii.9, in distinction from the visible body of professing believers, who were marked in the foreheads, and openly known to be the Lord's" (The Works of John Newton, vol.VI, p.182)

Alvah Hovey was a 19th-century American Baptist who served many years in Newton Theological Institution, and edited The American Commentary. He wrote in one of his books: "Though the sacred writers say nothing in respect to the future condition of those who die in infancy, one can scarcely err in deriving from this silence a favorable conclusion. That no prophet or apostle, that no devout father or mother, should have expressed any solicitude as to those who die before they are able to discern good from evil is surprising, unless such solicitude was prevented by the Spirit of God. There are no instances of prayer for children taken away in infancy. The Savior nowhere teaches that they are in danger of being lost. We therefore heartily and confidently believe that they are redeemed by the blood of Christ and sanctified by His Spirit, so that when they enter the unseen world they will be found with the saints" (Biblical Eschatology, pp.170f).

Lorraine Boettner was a 20th-Century Presbyterian who taught Bible for eight years in Pikeville College, Kentucky. In his book The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination he wrote at some length in defense of the Calvinist doctrine of infant salvation. We here quote from his remarks: "Calvinists, of course, hold that the doctrine of original sin applies to infants as well as to adults. Like all other sons of Adam, infants are truly culpable because of race sin and might be justly punished for it. Their 'salvation' is real. It is possible only through the grace of Christ and is as truly unmerited as is that of adults. Instead of minimizing the demerit and punishment due to them for original sin, Calvinism magnifies the mercy of God in their salvation. Their salvation means something, for it is the deliverance of guilty souls from eternal woe. And it is costly, for it was paid for by the suffering of Christ on the cross. Those who take the other view of original sin, namely, that it is not properly sin and does not deserve eternal punishment, make the evil from which infants are 'saved' to be very small, and consequently the love and gratitude which they owe to God to be small also.

"... Calvinism ... extends saving grace far beyond the boundaries of the visible church. If it is true that all of those who die in infancy, in heathen as well as in Christian lands, are saved, then more than half of the human race up to the present time has been among the elect."


B.B. Warfield, born in Kentucky in 1851, was along with Abraham Kuyper and Herman Bavinck one of the three most outstanding Reformed theologians in his day. He wrote concerning those who die in infancy:"Their destiny is determined irrespective of their choice, by an unconditional decree of God, suspended for its execution on no act of their own; and their salvation is wrought by an unconditional application of the grace of Christ to their souls, through the immediate and irresistible operation of the Holy Spirit prior to and apart from any action of their own proper wills... And if death in infancy does depend on God's providence, it is assuredly God in His providence who selects this vast multitude to be made participants of His unconditional salvation.... This is but to say that they are unconditionally predestinated to salvation from the foundation of the world" (quoted in Boettner's book).

Charles Haddon Spurgeon is perhaps the most-widely recognized name among Calvinists next to John Calvin. He served many years in the 19th-century as pastor in the Metropolitan Tabernacle in London, England. He preached on September 29, 1861, a message entitled "Infant Salvation" (#411 in Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit). In this message, Mr. Spurgeon not only convincingly proved from Holy Scriptures the belief of Calvinists that all persons dying in infancy are saved, but also soundly rebuked those Arminians and others who wrongly accuse us otherwise:

"It has been wickedly, lyingly, and slanderously said of Calvinists, that we believe that some little children perish. Those who make the accusation know that their charge is false. I cannot even dare to hope, though I would wish to do so, that they ignorantly misrepresent us. They wickedly repeat what has been denied a thousand times, what they know is not true.... I know of no exception, but we all hope and believe that all persons dying in infancy are elect. Dr. Gill, who has been looked upon in late times as being a very standard of Calvinism, not to say of ultra-Calvinism, himself never hints for a moment the supposition that any infant has perished, but affirms of it that it is a dark and mysterious subject, but that it is his belief, and he thinks he has Scripture to warrant it, that they who have fallen asleep in infancy have not perished, but have been numbered with the chosen of God, and so have entered into eternal rest. We have never taught the contrary, and when the charge is brought, I repudiate it and say, 'You may have said so, we never did, and you know we never did. If you dare to repeat the slander again, let the lie stand in scarlet on your very cheek if you be capable of a blush.' We have never dreamed of such a thing. With very few and rare exceptions, so rare that I never heard of them except from the lips of slanderers, we have never imagined that infants dying as infants have perished, but we have believed that they enter into the paradise of God."

Whom will you believe: Calvinists speaking for themselves? or Arminians deliberately misrepresenting them?
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And as it is appointed unto men once, to die. Heb 9:27 For as in Adam all die. 1 Cor 15:22 Even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 1 Cor 15:22 But after this the judgment: Heb 9:27

What I believe to be the chronology of those two verses.

What say each of you? Are you judged before you die. After you die? After you are made alive in Christ?
Are children inclusive in, men anthrōpos?

Psa 16:10
For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell (shĕ'owl, from LXX ᾅδην Hades) ; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.
Peter speaking in Acts 2:27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell (Hades), neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption. V's 30,31
Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell (Hades), neither his flesh did see corruption.

Psalms 116:3,4 The sorrows of death compassed me, and the pains of hell (Sheol) gat hold upon me: I found trouble and sorrow. Then called I upon the name of the LORD; O LORD, I beseech thee, deliver my soul.

The resurrection of Jesus was a birth from death, a birth, a deliverance of the soul from Sheol/Hades.

Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again. John 3:7

Children who die?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
The thoughts of John Gill's, that great Baptist preacher, on those who die in infancy!

John Gill, A Body of Divinity, page188

The truth of all this might be illustrated and confirmed by the case of infants dying in infancy; who, as soon as they are in the world, almost, are taken out of it. Now such a number as they are, can never be thought to be brought into being in vain, and without some end to be answered; and which, no doubt, is the glory of God, who is and will be glorified in them, some way or another, as well as in adult persons: now though their election is a secret to us, and unrevealed; it may be reasonably supposed, yea, in a judgment of charity it may rather be concluded, that they are all chosen, than that none are; and if it is allowed that any of them may be chosen, it is enough to my present purpose; since the election of them cannot be owing to their faith, holiness, obedience, good works, and perseverance, or to the foresight of these things, which do not appear in them.


John Gill’s, A Body of Divinity, can also be found online!

***********************

John Gill on 2 Samuel 12:23

Ver. 23. But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? &c.] And pray; it is to no purpose, no end can be thought to be answered by it:

can I bring him back again? from the state of the dead, bring him to life by fasting, and praying, and weeping; that is not to e expected:

I shall go to him; to the state of the dead, to the grave, where his body was, or would be; to heaven and eternal happiness, where his soul was, as he comfortably hoped and believed: from whence it appears, that the Old Testament saints did not suppose an annihilation at death; but believed the immortality of the soul, a future state after death of eternal life and bliss:

but he shall not return to me. in the present mortal state, though at the resurrection they should meet again.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That's some good info OR.

David, concerning his child that died:

22 And he said, While the child was yet alive, I fasted and wept: for I said, Who knoweth whether Jehovah will not be gracious to me, that the child may live?
23 But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he will not return to me. 2 Sam 12

Samuel said something similar to Saul:

19 Moreover Jehovah will deliver Israel also with thee into the hand of the Philistines; and to-morrow shalt thou and thy sons be with me: Jehovah will deliver the host of Israel also into the hand of the Philistines. 1Sam 28
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
....Moreover, I have been reading it at least once a day for the last month in preparation for the "Hebrews Initiative" that I am participating in beginning in a few weeks.....

http://www.lifeway.com/n/special-emphasis/hebrews-initiative

"To remain faithful in a faithless society". I wish the movement Godspeed. It is certainly a noble endeavor as it has been in all ages. I pray for revival often.

I have spent much of my time thinking about the argument made in Hebrews - one thing follows on another....

"Doctrinally dense" is a good depiction. Hebrews is so thick with types I tend to revert to speaking in 'type mode'. But, 'Hold fast and don't go back' is a consistent theme throughout the epistle to those beleaguered persecuted Hebrew Christians:

6 but Christ as a son, over his house; whose house are we, if we hold fast our boldness and the glorying of our hope firm unto the end.
14 for we are become partakers of Christ, if we hold fast the beginning of our confidence firm unto the end: Heb 3
14 Having then a great high priest, who hath passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. Heb 4
23 let us hold fast the confession of our hope that it waver not; for he is faithful that promised: Heb 10

There was to be no repentance granted for those that fell away and returned back to that apostate system that killed Christ, because by returning they crucified the Son of God afresh and put him to an open shame (Heb 6:4-6), but there was only a certain fearful expectation of judgment which would devour the adversaries before that generation passed away (Heb 10:37), for those that had trodden under foot the Son of God and counted the blood of the covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing and done despite unto the Spirit of grace (Heb 10:27-29) by falling away back to the apostate Judaism they been delivered from.

THAT is a very crucial message contained within the book.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
http://www.lifeway.com/n/special-emphasis/hebrews-initiative

"To remain faithful in a faithless society". I wish the movement Godspeed. It is certainly a noble endeavor as it has been in all ages. I pray for revival often.



"Doctrinally dense" is a good depiction. Hebrews is so thick with types I tend to revert to speaking in 'type mode'. But, 'Hold fast and don't go back' is a consistent theme throughout the epistle to those beleaguered persecuted Hebrew Christians:

6 but Christ as a son, over his house; whose house are we, if we hold fast our boldness and the glorying of our hope firm unto the end.
14 for we are become partakers of Christ, if we hold fast the beginning of our confidence firm unto the end: Heb 3
14 Having then a great high priest, who hath passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. Heb 4
23 let us hold fast the confession of our hope that it waver not; for he is faithful that promised: Heb 10

There was to be no repentance granted for those that fell away and returned back to that apostate system that killed Christ, because by returning they crucified the Son of God afresh and put him to an open shame (Heb 6:4-6), but there was only a certain fearful expectation of judgment which would devour the adversaries before that generation passed away (Heb 10:37), for those that had trodden under foot the Son of God and counted the blood of the covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing and done despite unto the Spirit of grace (Heb 10:27-29) by falling away back to the apostate Judaism they been delivered from.

THAT is a very crucial message contained within the book.

There was a time when Hebrews was my favorite Book in the Bible. I saw it as a summary of GOD's purpose of the redemption of HIS people as revealed in all of Scripture. Then I spent six months or more teaching the Epistle Ephesians to a bunch of old men {Saints} like myself and I said to myself: "It don't get any better than this!"

But then it occurred to me that without the Book of Genesis, particular the first three chapters none of it makes any difference. Therefore, I just told myself: "The Bible is my favorite Book of the Bible!". Now it is difficult for me to get on the same page with Ezekiel and I have trouble with Job and some of the minor prophets. Some of Job's buddies seem to have something to say that is worthwhile but GOD apparently thinks otherwise, and I read: Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said, Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?

But if I cannot understand all I would wish in Job I can understand that wonderful message GOD has for us: 23. Oh that my words were now written! oh that they were printed in a book!
24. That they were graven with an iron pen and lead in the rock for ever!
25. For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:
26. And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:
27. Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Amen OR!

I rejoice at thy word, As one that findeth great spoil. Ps 119:162

...and he didn't even have the complete book as we do!
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That's some good info OR.

David, concerning his child that died:

22 And he said, While the child was yet alive, I fasted and wept: for I said, Who knoweth whether Jehovah will not be gracious to me, that the child may live?
23 But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he will not return to me. 2 Sam 12

Samuel said something similar to Saul:

19 Moreover Jehovah will deliver Israel also with thee into the hand of the Philistines; and to-morrow shalt thou and thy sons be with me: Jehovah will deliver the host of Israel also into the hand of the Philistines. 1Sam 28

Would you agree by reading Acts 2, that David believed at death his soul would be in Hades/Sheol? And that by Peter saying that David had not ascended into the heavens and was both dead and buried, that the soul of him, on that day was still in Hades/Sheol.

Now exactly where was the child of David, that day of Pentecost, following the death and resurrection of Jesus?

Peter says that David was not speaking of himself but of the fruit of his loins, that by resurrection, the soul of the Christ would not be left to Hades/Sheol.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
25 For David saith concerning him, I beheld the Lord always before my face; For he is on my right hand, that I should not be moved:
26 Therefore my heart was glad, and my tongue rejoiced; Moreover my flesh also shall dwell in hope:
27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul unto Hades, Neither wilt thou give thy Holy One to see corruption.
28 Thou madest known unto me the ways of life; Thou shalt make me full of gladness with thy countenance. Acts 2 [Ps 16]

Peter is quoting from a Messianic Psalm where David is articulating through the Spirit the words/thoughts of Christ, not pertaining to David himself.

Related thread:
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=1824694#post1824694

Concerning David's son, Sheol, the waiting place of the righteous, etc., I don't know what the correct sequence of events were/are. It seems there was a designated destination for the righteous though.
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
25 For David saith concerning him, I beheld the Lord always before my face; For he is on my right hand, that I should not be moved:
26 Therefore my heart was glad, and my tongue rejoiced; Moreover my flesh also shall dwell in hope:
27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul unto Hades, Neither wilt thou give thy Holy One to see corruption.
28 Thou madest known unto me the ways of life; Thou shalt make me full of gladness with thy countenance. Acts 2 [Ps 16]

Peter is quoting from a Messianic Psalm where David is articulating through the Spirit the words/thoughts of Christ, not pertaining to David himself.

Related thread:
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=1824694#post1824694

Concerning David's son, Sheol, the waiting place of the righteous, etc., I don't know what the correct sequence of events were/are. It seems there was a designated destination for the righteous though.

I agree with you in the other thread that those Psalms are speaking of Jesus the Christ and or are voiced as the Christ being the speaker.

I will give another which I believe very important to understand as Christ being the speaker. Psalms 116:8-10 For thou hast delivered my soul from death, mine eyes from tears, and my feet from falling. I will walk before the LORD in the land of the living. I believed, therefore have I spoken: I was greatly afflicted: - relative to as used in 2 Cor 4:13 We having the same spirit of faith, according as it is written, I believed, and therefore have I spoken; we also believe, and therefore speak; - we believe, because by the Spirit, we have the faith of Christ.

Let me rephrase my other question. If, because of the resurrection, the soul of Christ has departed from or has not been left in Hades/Sheol, does that not imply that the soul of David and his son are still in Hades/Sheol?

Will they also, by necessity, have to be resurrected in order that their soul not be left in Hades/Sheol?
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I had previously written:

Moreover, if we claim that these people are true believers who somehow work their way out of God's transforming work which contradicts all kinds of teaching about the perseverance of the saints.

Where do you find that distinction of 'true believers' in the NT?

Beyond all of the teachings of Jesus that deal with believers demonstrating that they are followers of Jesus by being persons of transformed character by bearing good fruit, being productive, and living a life of compassion for others, we can look past the gospels to see this principle laid out specifically:

“It is not as though the word of God had failed. For not all those who are descended from Israel are truly Israel, nor are all the children Abraham’s true descendants; rather “through Isaac will your descendants be counted.” This means it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God; rather, the children of promise are counted as descendants.” Romans 9:6-8

“Notice therefore the kindness and harshness of God—harshness toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness toward you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off. And even they—if they do not continue in their unbelief—will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again.” Romans 11:22-23

“For we have become partners with Christ, if in fact we hold our initial confidence firm until the end.” Hebrews 3:14

“If we endure, we will also reign with him. If we deny him, he will also deny us.” 2 Timothy 2:12

“For if after they have escaped the filthy things of the world through the rich knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they again get entangled in them and succumb to them, their last state has become worse for them than their first. For it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than, having known it, to turn back from the holy commandment that had been delivered to them.” 2 Peter 2:20-21

“They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us, because if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us. But they went out from us to demonstrate that all of them do not belong to us.” 1 John 2:19

“Everyone who has been fathered by God does not practice sin, because God’s seed resides in him, and thus he is not able to sin, because he has been fathered by God.” 1 John 3:9

Where in the scriptures does it say that [1] His redeemed, born from above children cannot commit the sin of unbelief, or [2] that Christ's atonement does not cover the sin of unbelief? I say both these notions are wrong.
Those who commit the sin of unbelief – rejecting Christ – are “born from above”? Nope. That doesn’t make sense to me unless you are a universalist, and I don’t think you are. The type that is being shown through the exodus story is that there were those who rebelled who refused to enter into God’s rest (the promised land where they would be a kingdom of priests ruled by God). The Christian parallel to the promised land is the Kingdom of God, which is the rule of God. How can we can Jesus “Lord” if we don’t do what He says? Simply put, we cannot say it truthfully.

Simply put, a person becomes a Christian by taking up their cross and following Jesus (Matthew 16:24-25 and Luke 14:26-33). Interpreted, that statement means that they considered their old life as something that is as good as dead (the picture is a person walking to their execution), but they are following Jesus into a different kind of life. They are turned over everything they know themselves to be, to all they know Christ to be.

Hard times fell upon these Jewish Christians and they fell away/turned back in their hearts unto Egypt just as their forefathers in the type did, and just as Christ prophesied that some would. You judge them to be children of the devil.
Actually, I stand with the author of Hebrews:

“But in your case, dear friends, even though we speak like this, we are convinced of better things relating to salvation.” Hebrews 6:9

The author of Hebrews thinks that they will persevere and move out of unbelief into faith, but is warning these persons of Hebrew origins that if they do not, it is evidence that they will not inherit the Kingdom of God, where eternal life is received.

I cannot/will not do that.
Even if the Bible teaches otherwise? This is a statement of the will, not the statement of a learner who is open to be taught from the scripture.

...and that's quite some gymnastics there in your last post…
Not at all. It is an attempt to understand the passage in light of the context.

…all in an attempt to disprove what the text describes them as, i.e., brethren, partakers of the Holy Spirit, tasted the good word of God, received the knowledge of the truth, sanctified by the blood of the covenant, the LORD's people.

If you are going to accuse me of trying to deny scripture, at least you could do all of us the courtesy of quoting it accurately. In no place does it say, “The LORD’s people.”

Here is the passage in question:

Hebrews 6:4-8
For it is impossible in the case of those who have once been enlightened, tasted the heavenly gift, become partakers of the Holy Spirit, tasted the good word of God and the miracles of the coming age, and then have committed apostasy, to renew them again to repentance, since they are crucifying the Son of God for themselves all over again and holding him up to contempt. For the ground that has soaked up the rain that frequently falls on it and yields useful vegetation for those who tend it receives a blessing from God. But if it produces thorns and thistles, it is useless and about to be cursed; its fate is to be burned.

Notice that the apostasy that they are dangerously close to committing is compared to crucifying the Son of God (complete and vicious rejection) and holding Him up to contempt. Then there is an allusion to the parable of the sower (Matthew 13) where there are four soils that receive the seed, but one is so hard that the seeds do not take root, another soil is shallow and the seed that germinates cannot take firm root, the next soil has the seed choked out by thorns (aka the cares of the world), but the last soil receives the seed and is fruitful. Only the last soil is a picture of the believer.

Also in this same context, Jesus give us the parable of the wheat and the tares (Matthew 13:24-30 and 13:36-43). The tares/weeds look just like wheat for much of their life cycle, but produce no fruit and are destroyed (verses 41-42 and 49-50).

The author of Hebrews is not trying to tell us that these believers are true believers in this passage by pointing out that they have been enlighted, tasted/experienced the “heavenly gift”, and tasted/experienced the “good word of God and miracles.” It is a build-up to demonstrate the magnitude and incomprehensible nature of their hesitation to go all the way into a full commitment to Christ. It is just like their forefathers in the desert who experienced the presence and miracles of God every day, yet would not trust Him. They demonstrated that they were not Abraham’s true spiritual descendants (Romans 9:6-8).
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I had previously written:

BB, I want to apologize to you if I come across as being disrespectful to you. I’ve read enough of your posts in the past to convince me that you are a sincere, devoted Christian and student of His word, and you do indeed have my respect for that.

I doubt we’re going to come to agreement on some of these points. I admit, I’m a ‘hyper’. I’m a ‘hyper-Monergist’ in my soteriology, and a ‘hyper-originalist’ in my initial approach to scripture, i.e., what was the original intent of the writer? As Hodge worded it, “The Scriptures are to be taken in the sense attached to them in the age and by the people to whom they were addressed".

Moreover, if we claim that these people are true believers….

If they’ve ‘made shipwreck of the faith’ they can no longer be considered as ‘true believers’, now can they? But that doesn’t change their eternal status as ‘redeemed’.

… who somehow work their way out of God's transforming work which contradicts all kinds of teaching about the perseverance of the saints.

I hold to ‘preservation’ of the saints as demonstrated in 1 Cor 5:5.

Beyond all of the teachings of Jesus that deal with believers demonstrating that they are followers of Jesus by being persons of transformed character by bearing good fruit, being productive, and living a life of compassion for others, we can look past the gospels to see this principle laid out specifically:

You’ve just given a description of what we all should aspire to be.

“It is not as though the word of God had failed. For not all those who are descended from Israel are truly Israel, nor are all the children Abraham’s true descendants; rather “through Isaac will your descendants be counted.” This means it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God; rather, the children of promise are counted as descendants.” Romans 9:6-8

Amen!

“Notice therefore the kindness and harshness of God—harshness toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness toward you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off. And even they—if they do not continue in their unbelief—will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again.” Romans 11:22-23

Amen!

“For we have become partners with Christ, if in fact we hold our initial confidence firm until the end.” Hebrews 3:14

And this is where we’ll part ways. I assume you consider becoming ‘partners with Christ’ as an absolute necessity in order to go to heaven, whereas I consider it to be the grandest of privileges His children could ever have in this temporal realm. To be ‘partners with Christ’ is to have life and to have it abundantly, here on earth.

14 for we are become partakers of Christ, if we hold fast the beginning of our confidence firm unto the end:
15 while it is said, To-day if ye shall hear his voice, Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation.
16 For who, when they heard, did provoke? nay, did not all they that came out of Egypt by Moses?
17 And with whom was he displeased forty years? was it not with them that sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness?
18 And to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest, but to them that were disobedient?
19 And we see that they were not able to enter in because of unbelief. Heb 3

Were not all these that hardened their hearts, provoked Him, displeased Him, disobeyed Him, and believed not Him, also redeemded by Him with a mighty hand from the House of Bondage?

1 For I would not, brethren, have you ignorant, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;
2 and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
3 and did all eat the same spiritual food;
4 and did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of a spiritual rock that followed them: and the rock was Christ.
5 Howbeit with most of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.
6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.
7 Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.
8 Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand.
9 Neither let us make trial of the Lord, as some of them made trial, and perished by the serpents.
10 Neither murmur ye, as some of them murmured, and perished by the destroyer.
11 Now these things happened unto them by way of example; and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages are come.
12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall. 1 Cor 10

The exhortation to us here is to NOT do as they did. Is it hard thing for you to accept that God’s redeemed, born from above children are capable of doing everything they’re told not to do in the book?

“If we endure, we will also reign with him. If we deny him, he will also deny us.” 2 Timothy 2:12

Here, I’ll go on with the next verse for you :):

13 if we are faithless, he abideth faithful; for he cannot deny himself.

What a wonderful, magnificent, faithful God that we have!:

3 For what if some were without faith? shall their want of faith make of none effect the faithfulness of God?
4 God forbid: yea, let God be found true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy words, And mightest prevail when thou comest into judgment. Ro 3

38 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers,
39 nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Ro 8

“For if after they have escaped the filthy things of the world through the rich knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they again get entangled in them and succumb to them, their last state has become worse for them than their first. For it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than, having known it, to turn back from the holy commandment that had been delivered to them.” 2 Peter 2:20-21

No doubt Peter, as an apostle to the circumcision, is addressing exactly the ‘falling away’ that was occurring in Hebrews. Do you believe that ‘after they have escaped the filthy things of the world through the rich knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ’ they can become eternally damned? I assume you’re reading eternal consequences for these that have ‘turned back’.

“They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us, because if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us. But they went out from us to demonstrate that all of them do not belong to us.” 1 John 2:19

This is often misapplied to any ‘backsliding’ Christian. These are antichrists, false teachers, seeking to lead others astray:

18 Little children, it is the last hour: and as ye heard that antichrist cometh, even now have there arisen many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last hour.
19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they all are not of us. 1 Jn 2

In the same vein as:

28 Take heed unto yourselves, and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit hath made you bishops, to feed the church of the Lord which he purchased with his own blood.
29 I know that after my departing grievous wolves shall enter in among you, not sparing the flock;
30 and from among your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them. Acts 20

A distinction needs to be made between those that are leading astray and those that are being led astray.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Cont.

“Everyone who has been fathered by God does not practice sin, because God’s seed resides in him, and thus he is not able to sin, because he has been fathered by God.” 1 John 3:9

Again, who is this in reference to, and what is the sin?:

7 My little children, let no man lead you astray: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous:
8 he that doeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. To this end was the Son of God manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
9 Whosoever is begotten of God doeth no sin, because his seed abideth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is begotten of God.
10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother. 1 Jn 3

In the same vein as:

15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep`s clothing, but inwardly are ravening wolves.
16 By their fruits ye shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but the corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
20 Therefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Mt 7

These are false teachers, antichrists, wolves in sheep clothing that these passages are in reference to.

Those who commit the sin of unbelief – rejecting Christ

The subjects we’re discussing were once enlightened and had tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Spirit, and tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the age to come, and THEN fell away. Initially, there was ‘acceptance’ on their part.

– are “born from above”? Nope. That doesn’t make sense to me

It would if you can grasp the concept that His children are capable of doing everything they’re told NOT to do.

unless you are a universalist, and I don’t think you are.

I don’t think I am.

The type that is being shown through the exodus story is that there were those who rebelled who refused to enter into God’s rest (the promised land where they would be a kingdom of priests ruled by God).

Can you cite that I’ve highlighted?

The Christian parallel to the promised land is the Kingdom of God, which is the rule of God. How can we can Jesus “Lord” if we don’t do what He says? Simply put, we cannot say it truthfully.

Amen. Agree totally.

Simply put, a person becomes a Christian by taking up their cross and following Jesus (Matthew 16:24-25 and Luke 14:26-33). Interpreted, that statement means that they considered their old life as something that is as good as dead (the picture is a person walking to their execution), but they are following Jesus into a different kind of life. They are turned over everything they know themselves to be, to all they know Christ to be.

Amen. Agree totally.


Actually, I stand with the author of Hebrews:

“But in your case, dear friends, even though we speak like this, we are convinced of better things relating to salvation.” Hebrews 6:9

Perhaps the writer gives some positive reinforcement here?

The author of Hebrews thinks that they will persevere and move out of unbelief into faith, but is warning these persons of Hebrew origins that if they do not, it is evidence that they will not inherit the Kingdom of God, where eternal life is received.

The kingdom of God here on earth, joy, peace, and righteousness in the Holy Spirit, to lay hold on eternal life, to have it abundantly. The QUALITY of eternal life. The foretaste of glory divine. His children’s eternal destiny was fixed when their names were written before the foundation of the world.

Even if the Bible teaches otherwise? This is a statement of the will, not the statement of a learner who is open to be taught from the scripture.

So you’re able to tell who belongs to God and who doesn’t?

….In no place does it say, “The LORD’s people.”

29 of how much sorer punishment, think ye, shall he be judged worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him that said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. Heb 10

Here is the passage in question:

Actually it’s more passages than this. It’s those that describe these as ‘brethren, partakers of the Holy Spirit, tasted the good word of God, received the knowledge of the truth, sanctified by the blood of the covenant, the LORD's people’, chapters 3-10.

Hebrews 6:4-8
For it is impossible in the case of those who have once been enlightened, tasted the heavenly gift, become partakers of the Holy Spirit, tasted the good word of God and the miracles of the coming age, and then have committed apostasy, to renew them again to repentance, since they are crucifying the Son of God for themselves all over again and holding him up to contempt. For the ground that has soaked up the rain that frequently falls on it and yields useful vegetation for those who tend it receives a blessing from God. But if it produces thorns and thistles, it is useless and about to be cursed; its fate is to be burned.

Notice that the apostasy that they are dangerously close to committing is compared to crucifying the Son of God (complete and vicious rejection) and holding Him up to contempt.

By returning to the apostate religion that killed Christ they were in essence taking part in that horrendous crime all over again.

Then there is an allusion to the parable of the sower (Matthew 13) where there are four soils that receive the seed, but one is so hard that the seeds do not take root, another soil is shallow and the seed that germinates cannot take firm root, the next soil has the seed choked out by thorns (aka the cares of the world), but the last soil receives the seed and is fruitful. Only the last soil is a picture of the believer.

Also in this same context, Jesus give us the parable of the wheat and the tares (Matthew 13:24-30 and 13:36-43). The tares/weeds look just like wheat for much of their life cycle, but produce no fruit and are destroyed (verses 41-42 and 49-50).

The author of Hebrews is not trying to tell us that these believers are true believers in this passage by pointing out that they have been enlighted, tasted/experienced the “heavenly gift”, and tasted/experienced the “good word of God and miracles.” It is a build-up to demonstrate the magnitude and incomprehensible nature of their hesitation to go all the way into a full commitment to Christ. It is just like their forefathers in the desert who experienced the presence and miracles of God every day, yet would not trust Him. They demonstrated that they were not Abraham’s true spiritual descendants (Romans 9:6-8).

I generally disagree with your scripture comparisons here, but duty is calling me to other things. I think we’ve covered plenty enough already to debate though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top