• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Christ died for the dead in hell?

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
Show me a passage that presents a man who is regenerated but faithless.
Oxymoron. The purpose of regeneration is to bestow faith. That is the whole point of efficacious Grace. God's Grace always accomplishes what He intended it to accomplish.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
First we believe, then are given the right to become children of God which occurs when we are spiritually born anew. Thus John 1:12-13 teaches faith before regeneration which refers to being born anew, which occurs when we are transferred into Christ.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
First we believe, then are given the right to become children of God which occurs when we are spiritually born anew. Thus John 1:12-13 teaches faith before regeneration which refers to being born anew, which occurs when we are transferred into Christ.
Unless the Father first called and brought us to jesus, none here would have gotten saved!
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
What is the E on the TULI(E)P? I've never heard of that.
"Irresistible Grace" begs more questions than it answers so I prefer E = Efficacious Grace. That term simply means that God's Grace never fails, it always accomplishes what He intended it to accomplish.
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
I don't use the term because it carries way too much baggage.

But I stand firmly on TULI(E)P.
Allow me to elaborate a bit.

I am neither a Calvinist nor an Arminian, I am a Biblicist. I don't follow any man, nor do I attach my faith to the name of a man, nor do I refer to my salvation in the terms associated with any man.

I accept, for the most part, the canons of the Synod of Dort, which reflect Biblical Soteriology. To say I must reject the bible (I.E., "biblicist") and accept the philosophy of man (I.E., "Calvinist" or "Arminian") is to deny the Bible, the Saviour of the Bible, and the God of the Bible.

I am not a "Calvinist" because Calvin was a baby sprinkling heretic who taught that the ordinances (he called them "sacraments") were a "means of grace." He may have come out of his apostate Roman Catholic Church but he brought too much of the furniture with him.

I have to admit it bothers me when a Baptist calls himself a "Calvinist." Calvin wrote that "Honour, glory, and riches shall be the reward of your pains; but above all, do not fail to rid the country of those scoundrels [Anabaptists and others], who stir up the people to revolt against us. Such monsters should be exterminated, as I have exterminated Michael Servetus the Spaniard." *

No thanks. I will not side with a man who believes the ordinances are a "means of grace," that Baptists are "monsters" and worthy of death, that sprinkled babies, hated the biblical doctrine of separation of church and state, and had his so-called "church" rule over Geneva to the point that in comparison the Taliban looks moderate!

(*John Calvin Letter to the Marquis Paet, chamberlain to the King of Navarre, 1561.)
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Allow me to elaborate a bit.

I am neither a Calvinist nor an Arminian, I am a Biblicist. I don't follow any man, nor do I attach my faith to the name of a man, nor do I refer to my salvation in the terms associated with any man.

I accept, for the most part, the canons of the Synod of Dort, which reflect Biblical Soteriology. To say I must reject the bible (I.E., "biblicist") and accept the philosophy of man (I.E., "Calvinist" or "Arminian") is to deny the Bible, the Saviour of the Bible, and the God of the Bible.

I am not a "Calvinist" because Calvin was a baby sprinkling heretic who taught that the ordinances (he called them "sacraments") were a "means of grace." He may have come out of his apostate Roman Catholic Church but he brought too much of the furniture with him.

I have to admit it bothers me when a Baptist calls himself a "Calvinist." Calvin wrote that "Honour, glory, and riches shall be the reward of your pains; but above all, do not fail to rid the country of those scoundrels [Anabaptists and others], who stir up the people to revolt against us. Such monsters should be exterminated, as I have exterminated Michael Servetus the Spaniard." *

No thanks. I will not side with a man who believes the ordinances are a "means of grace," that Baptists are "monsters" and worthy of death, that sprinkled babies, hated the biblical doctrine of separation of church and state, and had his so-called "church" rule over Geneva to the point that in comparison the Taliban looks moderate!

(*John Calvin Letter to the Marquis Paet, chamberlain to the King of Navarre, 1561.)
One can be a calvinist/reformed Baptist, and not follow Calvin, but Christ!
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Unless the Father first called and brought us to Jesus, none here would have gotten saved!
.First we believe, then are given the right to become children of God which occurs when we are spiritually born anew. Thus John 1:12-13 teaches faith before regeneration which refers to being born anew, which occurs when we are transferred into Christ. We are given to Christ, John 6:37 when we are transferred into Christ. Notice that once given to Christ, we will not be cast out. Therefore being given refers to being baptized into Christ.
 
Allow me to elaborate a bit.

I am neither a Calvinist nor an Arminian, I am a Biblicist. I don't follow any man, nor do I attach my faith to the name of a man, nor do I refer to my salvation in the terms associated with any man.

I accept, for the most part, the canons of the Synod of Dort, which reflect Biblical Soteriology. To say I must reject the bible (I.E., "biblicist") and accept the philosophy of man (I.E., "Calvinist" or "Arminian") is to deny the Bible, the Saviour of the Bible, and the God of the Bible.

I am not a "Calvinist" because Calvin was a baby sprinkling heretic who taught that the ordinances (he called them "sacraments") were a "means of grace." He may have come out of his apostate Roman Catholic Church but he brought too much of the furniture with him.

I have to admit it bothers me when a Baptist calls himself a "Calvinist." Calvin wrote that "Honour, glory, and riches shall be the reward of your pains; but above all, do not fail to rid the country of those scoundrels [Anabaptists and others], who stir up the people to revolt against us. Such monsters should be exterminated, as I have exterminated Michael Servetus the Spaniard." *

No thanks. I will not side with a man who believes the ordinances are a "means of grace," that Baptists are "monsters" and worthy of death, that sprinkled babies, hated the biblical doctrine of separation of church and state, and had his so-called "church" rule over Geneva to the point that in comparison the Taliban looks moderate!

(*John Calvin Letter to the Marquis Paet, chamberlain to the King of Navarre, 1561.)
WOW. You gave me some new information about Calvin. I was not aware of that.
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
WOW. You gave me some new information about Calvin. I was not aware of that.
I didn't give you any information about Calvinism. I gave you information about Calvin and why I don't want my faith to be identified with him. :)
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
.First we believe, then are given the right to become children of God which occurs when we are spiritually born anew. Thus John 1:12-13 teaches faith before regeneration which refers to being born anew, which occurs when we are transferred into Christ. We are given to Christ, John 6:37 when we are transferred into Christ. Notice that once given to Christ, we will not be cast out. Therefore being given refers to being baptized into Christ.
How can spiritual dead sinners believe though first?
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hi Yeshua1, how can someone who believes what the bible says deny it? See Matthew 23:13. The ability to grasp this fundamental truth cannot be beyond your understanding.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hi Yeshua1, how can someone who believes what the bible says deny it? See Matthew 23:13. The ability to grasp this fundamental truth cannot be beyond your understanding.
That passage has NOT supported your position at all!
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Denial of the truth of scripture is no argument.. The ability to grasp this fundamental truth cannot be beyond your understanding.
 
Top