Eternally Grateful
Active Member
So your admitting you do not know what I believe?What do you actually believe about the soteriology of God. I will give you an actual chance to be precise and clear on the subject.
thank you
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So your admitting you do not know what I believe?What do you actually believe about the soteriology of God. I will give you an actual chance to be precise and clear on the subject.
Again, thats not free willIn my free will, which is the true free will not the humanistic fantasy free will, the people who God chooses to save are saved.
I think we all know he does not know what you believe. If you tell him he will only say you are the only one....'cause, you know, everybody else is Calvinistic.So your admitting you do not know what I believe?
thank you
Yes you are correct.He is a calvinist troll looking to cause strife and contention and mislead the naive.This post is just false. First, Jon doesn't understand Calvinists, at least not this one, second, he doesn't understand free will, third, he puts for the false charge of Cage Stage Calvinism. In short, he has no idea what he is talking about.
It does not matter who they are made up of.
Jesus is not saying He calls all men without exception. He is saying He calls all men without distinction between Jew and Gentile. That is the context of the passage.What do you think Jews & Gentiles are made up of? Your lack of understanding of basic logic is troubling. Then again perhaps that explains why you are a calvinist.
Yes again...24/7...anyone who reads these posts will see it.I honestly don't think you know what you believe and just spout off anything that comes to mind that will rile people up.
Jesus is not saying He calls all men without exception. He is saying He calls all men without distinction between Jew and Gentile. That is the context of the passage.
In John 12:19 the priests were concerned the “whole world” had gone after Jesus.
John 12:20 says that gentiles had come and asked to see Jesus
It is at this point Jesus tells us the time had come to glorify the Father through His death on the cross.
That is the context of Jesus saying He will draw all men to Himself. He means all men without distinction, not all men without exception.
That the Gentiles would be part of the Kingdom of God is a repeating theme in John’s gospel.
In John 1, we are told that those who are children of God are born, not of blood(s), nor of the will of man, but of God. The mention of “blood” is a reference to being a physical descendant of Abraham.
The theme of Gentile inclusion is repeated in John 10 and the parable of the Good Shepherd. Jesus says He has other sheep not of this fold (Jewish) that will hear His voice and follow Him.
And then again in John 12, where Jesus says He will draw all men to Himself.
Again, the context supports the interpretation of all men without distinction (Jew and Gentile) rather than all men without exception.
peace to you
Yes you are correct.He is a calvinist troll looking to cause strife and contention and mislead the naive.
Yes again...24/7...anyone who reads these posts will see it.
It does not matter who they are made up of.
@Reynolds , @Silverhair , and @Eternally Grateful are absolutely correct about the Calvinistic sect and their MO on this board. Here is undeniable proof:
Not addressing the disputes but attacking other Christians who dare to question their theology.
Jesus is not saying He calls all men without exception. He is saying He calls all men without distinction between Jew and Gentile. That is the context of the passage.
In John 12:19 the priests were concerned the “whole world” had gone after Jesus.
John 12:20 says that gentiles had come and asked to see Jesus
It is at this point Jesus tells us the time had come to glorify the Father through His death on the cross.
That is the context of Jesus saying He will draw all men to Himself. He means all men without distinction, not all men without exception.
That the Gentiles would be part of the Kingdom of God is a repeating theme in John’s gospel.
In John 1, we are told that those who are children of God are born, not of blood(s), nor of the will of man, but of God. The mention of “blood” is a reference to being a physical descendant of Abraham.
The theme of Gentile inclusion is repeated in John 10 and the parable of the Good Shepherd. Jesus says He has other sheep not of this fold (Jewish) that will hear His voice and follow Him.
And then again in John 12, where Jesus says He will draw all men to Himself.
Again, the context supports the interpretation of all men without distinction (Jew and Gentile) rather than all men without exception.
peace to you
Yes. A high Calvinist in fact. John Macarthur, in his Romans commentary. Why if a non Calvinist says this, he gets accused of adding "works" to grace?
You should try shooting fish.I have no patience for fishing or hunting!
I answered quickly by phone to encourage my brothers and warn others, I am on my laptop now.I will expose what is happening some more being you delight in it.
Jon, you must imagine you are now a prophet.I think we all know he does not know what you believe. If you tell him he will only say you are the only one....'cause, you know, everybody else is Calvinistic.
I also think we all know he does not care. How quick did it take him to declare I hold Tozer's view without even asking what I believe on the topic?
HIGH CALVINISTS IN ACTION: CALVINISM AND THE CITY, MANCHESTER AND LONDON, 1810–1860 - The Gospel CoalitionWhat is a “high Calvinists”?
peace to you
This is what I am talking about. You say you want to encourage your brothers by insulting us....but @Reynolds , @Silverhair , @Eternally Grateful and I are among your brothers.I answered quickly by phone to encourage my brothers and warn others, I am on my laptop now.I will expose what is happening some more being you delight in it.
Calvinists in solid churches have already been well instructed in the events of Adams ,sin and fall into death.
When they see JM write such a statement they know exactly what he means.
When we see the non cal say something like it, we know he is denying the condition of man and suggesting the full ability of the sinner.
From what I have seen it is primarily the Calvinists who mock those with whom they disagree.Jon, you must imagine you are now a prophet.
My problem is I have no desire to scour a hundred posts to figure out what y'all believe, especially when whatever I come up with will surely be mocked anyway.
At this point I simply expect you to live in a twilight zone of your own making.
But, you're right. I haven't got a clue what you and EG actually believe. For all I know you aren't even Baptists.
.So, Jon, I personally find no value in digging around the garbage philosophies of free will thinking. I would warn you against such authors, but it seems you have drank deep from the kool-aid.
Jon, do you even comprehend how condescending you are? It is clear ypu have a much higher view of yourself than others have of you. It's best if I ignore you rather than be frustrated by that which you are blind about yourself.
Feel free to go on reading books that deny the substitionary atonement of Christ or soteriology of grace. From my perspective you have abandoned the teaching of the vast majority of Christianity to cling to a novel view you cannot even clearly articulate. Following your path would in essence be a suicide mission in the path to sanctification while here on earth. I cannot join your path and I am fully at peace not joining you.
Jon, my heart pumps camel water for you.
I have listened quite well, thank you. I have found your theories entirely empty of merit. Moreso they are entirely built upon a house of cards that represent sentences removed from context that are merely prooftext for a pretext.
Jon, I assume you are a lone wolf who has no persons who either know what it is you actually believe and if they did, they wouldn't agree with you anyway. I have not met anyone more vague and shifty than you are here at the BB.
Jon, you must imagine you are now a prophet.
For all I know you aren't even Baptists.
I will give you an actual chance to be precise and clear on the subject.
At this point I simply expect you to live in a twilight zone of your own making.