• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Did a C or A say this?

Status
Not open for further replies.

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
So your admitting you do not know what I believe?

thank you
I think we all know he does not know what you believe. If you tell him he will only say you are the only one....'cause, you know, everybody else is Calvinistic.

I also think we all know he does not care. How quick did it take him to declare I hold Tozer's view without even asking what I believe on the topic?
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This post is just false. First, Jon doesn't understand Calvinists, at least not this one, second, he doesn't understand free will, third, he puts for the false charge of Cage Stage Calvinism. In short, he has no idea what he is talking about.
Yes you are correct.He is a calvinist troll looking to cause strife and contention and mislead the naive.
 

JD731

Well-Known Member
It does not matter who they are made up of.

It matters much. On a scale of 1 to ten trillion, with the higher the number indicating the more it matters, it matters far exceeds the scale. The doctrine of the trinity is at stake if it does not matter. The church of Jesus Christ carries the trinitarian signature of divine purpose. It is Jews and gentiles that make up the fleshly and human portion of the church, the body of Christ (which is also the bride of Christ, prefigured by Eve, who was taken out of the side of Adam and when complete, presented to him as his wife) and the Holy Ghost who indwells it both individually among the members and corporately as one entity. There must be a trinitarian image to the church, and there is. Jesus Christ our Lord is the Head of the body, the members of church is the one body, and the Holy Ghost indwells both Christ and his body at the same time, thus a trinity.

It is the same with Israel when the church is complete and taken to the Fathers house, prefigured by Isaac, a figure of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. God the Father, who is prefigured by Abraham and the unnamed servant, a figure of the Holy Ghost who goes out to find a bride for Isaac, Rebekah, and brings her to meet Isaac in the field, the first face to face meeting between the two, and he takes her to Abraham's tent. This is Gen 24.

God had provided in his providence for the trinitarian nature of restored and saved Israel as the people and nation of God in her own land after the church is complete by divided her into two during her disobedience in the OT. When she is save both Judah and Israel will be brought back as one and the Holy Ghost will indwell them thus bringing to pass the prophecy that God will write his law in their hearts. This is the trinitarian nature of Israel when God saves her. This is spelled out in Eze 36.
 
Last edited:

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
What do you think Jews & Gentiles are made up of? Your lack of understanding of basic logic is troubling. Then again perhaps that explains why you are a calvinist.
Jesus is not saying He calls all men without exception. He is saying He calls all men without distinction between Jew and Gentile. That is the context of the passage.

In John 12:19 the priests were concerned the “whole world” had gone after Jesus.

John 12:20 says that gentiles had come and asked to see Jesus

It is at this point Jesus tells us the time had come to glorify the Father through His death on the cross.

That is the context of Jesus saying He will draw all men to Himself. He means all men without distinction, not all men without exception.

That the Gentiles would be part of the Kingdom of God is a repeating theme in John’s gospel.

In John 1, we are told that those who are children of God are born, not of blood(s), nor of the will of man, but of God. The mention of “blood” is a reference to being a physical descendant of Abraham.

The theme of Gentile inclusion is repeated in John 10 and the parable of the Good Shepherd. Jesus says He has other sheep not of this fold (Jewish) that will hear His voice and follow Him.

And then again in John 12, where Jesus says He will draw all men to Himself.

Again, the context supports the interpretation of all men without distinction (Jew and Gentile) rather than all men without exception.

peace to you
 

JD731

Well-Known Member
Jesus is not saying He calls all men without exception. He is saying He calls all men without distinction between Jew and Gentile. That is the context of the passage.

In John 12:19 the priests were concerned the “whole world” had gone after Jesus.

John 12:20 says that gentiles had come and asked to see Jesus

It is at this point Jesus tells us the time had come to glorify the Father through His death on the cross.

That is the context of Jesus saying He will draw all men to Himself. He means all men without distinction, not all men without exception.

That the Gentiles would be part of the Kingdom of God is a repeating theme in John’s gospel.

In John 1, we are told that those who are children of God are born, not of blood(s), nor of the will of man, but of God. The mention of “blood” is a reference to being a physical descendant of Abraham.

The theme of Gentile inclusion is repeated in John 10 and the parable of the Good Shepherd. Jesus says He has other sheep not of this fold (Jewish) that will hear His voice and follow Him.

And then again in John 12, where Jesus says He will draw all men to Himself.

Again, the context supports the interpretation of all men without distinction (Jew and Gentile) rather than all men without exception.

peace to you


Explain this:

Mt 19:27 Then answered Peter and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore?
28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

There can be no doubt that the apostles to whom he was speaking in Matt 19 were Jews, and there is no doubt they were also the foundation of the church of Jesus Christ because the scriptures says this at a later date in Ephesians.

19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner [stone];
21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.
1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles,

The context says the "ye" is referencing gentiles and is what the Ephesian congregation was made up of. The point is that while Jews and gentiles are one in Christ they are distinct in Christ as well. However the worldwide church as it is being built over the centuries is in view here and there are distinctively Jews and gentiles in it. It has a Jewish foundation.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
It does not matter who they are made up of.

You calvinists jump up and down saying you forgot context then you turn around and say wait you have to understand a verse the way I do without the context. FYI my context is the bible, what is yours? When I say Christ Jesus came to save all you go no He did not see this verse dosn't say that. Get your head out of the mindset of calvinism.

Calvinism is just one big group think. You have given up the ability to think on your own. I have been on a number of boards and you get the same canned answers from the calvinists there. You guys must have a tip sheet you all read from. Sad really.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
@Reynolds , @Silverhair , and @Eternally Grateful are absolutely correct about the Calvinistic sect and their MO on this board. Here is undeniable proof:

Not addressing the disputes but attacking other Christians who dare to question their theology.

I answered quickly by phone to encourage my brothers and warn others, I am on my laptop now.I will expose what is happening some more being you delight in it.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
Jesus is not saying He calls all men without exception. He is saying He calls all men without distinction between Jew and Gentile. That is the context of the passage.

In John 12:19 the priests were concerned the “whole world” had gone after Jesus.

John 12:20 says that gentiles had come and asked to see Jesus

It is at this point Jesus tells us the time had come to glorify the Father through His death on the cross.

That is the context of Jesus saying He will draw all men to Himself. He means all men without distinction, not all men without exception.

That the Gentiles would be part of the Kingdom of God is a repeating theme in John’s gospel.

In John 1, we are told that those who are children of God are born, not of blood(s), nor of the will of man, but of God. The mention of “blood” is a reference to being a physical descendant of Abraham.

The theme of Gentile inclusion is repeated in John 10 and the parable of the Good Shepherd. Jesus says He has other sheep not of this fold (Jewish) that will hear His voice and follow Him.

And then again in John 12, where Jesus says He will draw all men to Himself.

Again, the context supports the interpretation of all men without distinction (Jew and Gentile) rather than all men without exception.

peace to you

You calvinists just can not stand the idea that God is really sovereign. You have to throw your calvinist philosophy into just about everything you say. You really have to just learn to trust the text of the bible. You have raised the writing of calvin, edwards, owen, piper etc above the bible.

You limit context to just the verses that you like but for me context is the bible.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes. A high Calvinist in fact. John Macarthur, in his Romans commentary. Why if a non Calvinist says this, he gets accused of adding "works" to grace?

Calvinists in solid churches have already been well instructed in the events of Adams ,sin and fall into death.
When they see JM write such a statement they know exactly what he means.
When we see the non cal say something like it, we know he is denying the condition of man and suggesting the full ability of the sinner.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
I answered quickly by phone to encourage my brothers and warn others, I am on my laptop now.I will expose what is happening some more being you delight in it.

Since when did you think that discussing the bible was a competition? Is that how you see a bible discussion?
 

AustinC

Well-Known Member
I think we all know he does not know what you believe. If you tell him he will only say you are the only one....'cause, you know, everybody else is Calvinistic.

I also think we all know he does not care. How quick did it take him to declare I hold Tozer's view without even asking what I believe on the topic?
Jon, you must imagine you are now a prophet.
My problem is I have no desire to scour a hundred posts to figure out what y'all believe, especially when whatever I come up with will surely be mocked anyway.
At this point I simply expect you to live in a twilight zone of your own making.

But, you're right. I haven't got a clue what you and EG actually believe. For all I know you aren't even Baptists.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I answered quickly by phone to encourage my brothers and warn others, I am on my laptop now.I will expose what is happening some more being you delight in it.
This is what I am talking about. You say you want to encourage your brothers by insulting us....but @Reynolds , @Silverhair , @Eternally Grateful and I are among your brothers.

Calvinists here much too often treat the breathern, at least any who dare to voice a different view, as if they were enemies, not brothers. They withdraw and condemn their own brothers.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
Calvinists in solid churches have already been well instructed in the events of Adams ,sin and fall into death.
When they see JM write such a statement they know exactly what he means.
When we see the non cal say something like it, we know he is denying the condition of man and suggesting the full ability of the sinner.

Your calvinist arrogance is showing. You act as if you are the purveyor of all knowledge. Talk about having an inflated opinion of oneself.

Once again we see that only the calvinist can read and understand anything. The comes from the fact we don't have the magic decoder ring that you guys use.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Jon, you must imagine you are now a prophet.
My problem is I have no desire to scour a hundred posts to figure out what y'all believe, especially when whatever I come up with will surely be mocked anyway.
At this point I simply expect you to live in a twilight zone of your own making.

But, you're right. I haven't got a clue what you and EG actually believe. For all I know you aren't even Baptists.
From what I have seen it is primarily the Calvinists who mock those with whom they disagree.
.So, Jon, I personally find no value in digging around the garbage philosophies of free will thinking. I would warn you against such authors, but it seems you have drank deep from the kool-aid.
Jon, do you even comprehend how condescending you are? It is clear ypu have a much higher view of yourself than others have of you. It's best if I ignore you rather than be frustrated by that which you are blind about yourself.
Feel free to go on reading books that deny the substitionary atonement of Christ or soteriology of grace. From my perspective you have abandoned the teaching of the vast majority of Christianity to cling to a novel view you cannot even clearly articulate. Following your path would in essence be a suicide mission in the path to sanctification while here on earth. I cannot join your path and I am fully at peace not joining you.

Jon, my heart pumps camel water for you.

I have listened quite well, thank you. I have found your theories entirely empty of merit. Moreso they are entirely built upon a house of cards that represent sentences removed from context that are merely prooftext for a pretext.

Jon, I assume you are a lone wolf who has no persons who either know what it is you actually believe and if they did, they wouldn't agree with you anyway. I have not met anyone more vague and shifty than you are here at the BB.

Jon, you must imagine you are now a prophet.

For all I know you aren't even Baptists.

I will give you an actual chance to be precise and clear on the subject.

At this point I simply expect you to live in a twilight zone of your own making.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top