There you go then… Okay would you define him as a sacrificial lamb?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
There you go then… Okay would you define him as a sacrificial lamb?
No. Definitely not. I would describe him as a vessel prepared for destruction.There you go then… Okay would you define him as a sacrificial lamb?
First, you imagine it is clear and no doubt you think your idea is correct. Others show you that Jesus did not atone for Judas sin and you get all bent out of shape.
You cannot acknowledge that atonement means fully paid for. If Jesus fully paid for Judas sins then Judas was made perfect and holy by the blood of Christ. God would be casting a person, whose sins are fully paid for, into hell.
Do you teach that fully atoned persons are spending eternity in hell, even though God sees no sin due to the atoning sacrifice of Christ?
Okay but did he do that himself or did the Lord use him to those ends?No. Definitely not. I would describe him as a vessel prepared for destruction.
I would say both.Okay but did he do that himself or did the Lord use him to those ends?
Not an equal analogy. If someone pays my fine in my place it doesn't matter if I accept it or not, it is covered in full. I no longer have the penalty.Your theological view is what is causing the problem for you. You think that just because Christ Jesus paid the debt it does not have to be accepted. If I offer a thirsty man a bottle of water they are still thirsty unless they accept it and drink it. The same for Gods' offer of salvation it is a gift that has to be accepted. God does not force anyone to be saved.
Six hour warning
This thread will be closed no sooner than 1155 pm EST / 855 pm PST
Salvation is not predicated on what we do...
It's predicated on what God does with rebellious and unrepentant sinners whose hearts He either changes, or does not.
Finally, for Judas to have repented, it would have had to been granted to him by the Lord through the new birth.
Being the son of perdition, he was not given that privilege by God.
That said, I've really no more to say to you on this subject...
but I do hope that you one day come to see that eternal life is a gift ( Romans 6:23 ) that is given because of the Lord's deciding to have favor on someone, and not because He "offered" it to us.
Not an equal analogy. If someone pays my fine in my place it doesn't matter if I accept it or not, it is covered in full. I no longer have the penalty.
False accusation first of all. And no, the Bible does not show my view to be an error. But I love how you went for the ad hominem rather than address my post.Yes I would expect that you will deny what scripture says so you can hold on to your theological view. The bible shows the error of your view but you deny that so we reach an impasse.
Okay but did he do that himself or did the Lord use him to those ends?
Nope.Your theological view is what is causing the problem for you. You think that just because Christ Jesus paid the debt it does not have to be accepted. If I offer a thirsty man a bottle of water they are still thirsty unless they accept it and drink it. The same for Gods' offer of salvation it is a gift that has to be accepted. God does not force anyone to be saved.
Six hour warning
This thread will be closed no sooner than 1155 pm EST / 855 pm PST