1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Did Jesus take on the wrath of God as propitiation for our sin?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Revmitchell, Mar 7, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. canadyjd

    canadyjd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,415
    Likes Received:
    1,766
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are dancing around the meaning of words. The whole sacrificial system was based on substitution.

    The person placed his hand on the animals head, symbolically transferring sin/guilt to the animal. The animal was killed as a substitute for the person, symbolizing the punishment for sin had been paid temporarily, appeasing God’s wrath in judgment.

    The entire sacrificial system was a shadow of the sacrifice Christ made for us. It was the symbol and Christ was the substance.

    Your disregard for what is clearly taught in scripture, PSA, demeans the work of Christ on the cross and robs Him of His glory.

    I understand you disagree. I simply cannot understand how you can redefine words and scripture to disregard what is taught and embrace what is not.

    peace to you
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is exactly what @JonC and I are also doing.

    We would that Scripture be the total focus, and all understanding come from there.

    You and I may disagree, but if we both cling to the Scriptures then the Holy Spirit will convict and convince as necessary.

    As our Lord expressed to the religious righteous of that time, you search the Scriptures and they speak of me. (my paraphrased version).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Disregard?? or his interpretation??

    Lets be very careful when we disagree with someone.
     
  4. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not true. The whole sacrificial system was based upon satisfaction.

    Not a single offering could be presented that was not pleasing to the God of the tabernacle/temple. If He wasn't satisfied, the sacrifice was worthless.

    This is one area that demonstrates how poorly PSA represents the Scripture truth.

    Certainly the "entire sacrificial system was a shadow of Christ, and even the yet to be fulfilled prophecies ultimately concern Him.

    However, Hebrews presents:
    11But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things that have come,e then through the greater and more perfect tent (not made with hands, that is, not of this creation) 12he entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption. 13For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, 14how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God.
    I don't read anything concerning substitution in this passage that is directly related to your presentation.

    What can be seen is the matter of the satisfaction "by means of His own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption."
    What can be seen is that the blood offered without blemish to God also purifies our conscience from dead works to serve the living God.

    Not substitution, but satisfaction. No exchange was made as one giving and receiving, but a matter of transference in which satisfaction brought eternal redemption.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is ok, Salty.

    The pathway to find Scripture understanding is often littered with some claims that may not be worded just right.

    You are welcome to join in and provide Scripture for your own thinking.
     
  6. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    @Iconoclast ,

    I am curious as to why you rate posts with which ypu disagree as "funny". We lost many ratings because people (you were one) became childish and abused the system. As an adult, if you are unable to articulate a response, then perhaps it would be best to simply remain silent and consider what was posted until such a time you find yourself able to communicate your disagreement as a man.

    When we were children we thought like children, we acted like children. But now that we are men, perhaps it is time to put away childish things.
     
  7. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The issue is not Scripture. You have shared Scripture, and we all confirm that Scripture.

    The issue is in developing doctrine.

    With foundational doctrines (really all doctrines, except some things taught are really debatable issues) I believe we have to stick to what is written in God's Word.

    Appropriate attire for church, what is modest....what is not...is subjective to an extent. But our redemption is at the very heart of our faith.

    The difference between you and I (and I believe @agedman would agree) is what we consider to be a source or test of foundational doctrines. Here I believe it is the text of Scripture, what "is written", God's Word. You, however, base doctrine not on Hod's Word but on what you believe has been reasoned out of Scripture (you dismiss the text of Scripture for what you believe or have been taught that text teaches).

    There is a problem with this. Christian sects and even cults base their doctrine not on God's Word but on what they believe Scripture teaches. It becomes subjective. Each sees God as revealing to them truths not actually recorded in the Bible. And each relies on philosophy rather than God's Word.

    What you believe cannot be found in God's Word....it is what you (and others since the Reformation) have reasoned out of it. Therefore it is impossible for your faith to be tested against the standard of God's Word. You can only offer passages and philosophical conclusions.
     
  8. Guido

    Guido Active Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2021
    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    36
    Faith:
    Baptist
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Amen!!! And Psalm 22.

    If we stick to Scripture it is impossible to believe Christ suffered God's wrath instead of us.

    This is what I have been saying all along. Just believe the Bible.
     
  10. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No, it wasn't. The animal was never a substitute for the man. It was always about obedience.

    The idea an animal can be sacrificed as a substitute to appease the wrath of a god is pagan.
     
  11. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It's a disregard. A willful rejection of customary usage, and the assigning of arbitrary meanings in direct contradiction to the message of the Scriptures.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Here you say Christ is not our substitute, and in other places you say He is. Do you really know what you think about this?

    upload_2022-3-9_6-56-24.png
    The Bearer of Sin and Guilt

    And the animal WAS the exchange. It was accepted either has a holy thing, and burned on the altar, or it was rejected from the altar as an unclean thing and burned on the ground. In either case, the animal was the substitute for the Israelite.
     
  13. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is not a disregard. It is the traditional meaning. What is being discarded is the Reformed customary meaning. The reason is the Reformers were reforming Roman Catholic doctrine and the majority of Christianity (all of Christianity prior to the Reformation) rejects the neo-RCC philosophy.
     
  14. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The difference is context. Scripture speaks of substitution as representation (President Biden is a substitute for every American citizen in the context of international discourse). But you are speaking of substitution differently (as replacement.....Biden is President instead of you).
     
  15. Eternally Grateful

    Eternally Grateful Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2022
    Messages:
    726
    Likes Received:
    84
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If redemption was not made. This would be impossible.

    Lets discuss redemption and justification apart from the sin debt being paid.

    The word trinity is not in scripture. Yet I pray you believe in the trinity.
     
  16. Eternally Grateful

    Eternally Grateful Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2022
    Messages:
    726
    Likes Received:
    84
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The penalty of sin is DEATH

    the gift of God is life.

    How can the gift be given if the penalty is not redeemed.
     
  17. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Because both stand. God is immutable. His declarations are eternal. God does not change. You will die physically and then the Judgment. If in Christ there is no condemnation. If not, you are not forgiven. All judgment is given to Christ.
     
  18. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Yes...sadly this appears to be the case.
     
  19. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    Correct.
    The redeemer bought us by paying the price of our sin as our substitute.
     
  20. AustinC

    AustinC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2020
    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    1,458
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So...the Passover is pagan?
     
  21. AustinC

    AustinC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2020
    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    1,458
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think I understand what you are saying. I don't know if God was filled with wrath toward Jesus. I doubt He was.
    The imagery of the Passover is that the father takes a beloved and pure lamb, which the family loved, and slits its throat. He takes the blood, which keeps the death angel from killing. The family eat the lamb and prepare for the wilderness. Jesus, clearly explained that he is that Lamb which is slain when he had the last supper with his disciples.
    Exodus 12:3-13
    Tell all the congregation of Israel that on the tenth day of this month every man shall take a lamb according to their fathers’ houses, a lamb for a household. And if the household is too small for a lamb, then he and his nearest neighbor shall take according to the number of persons; according to what each can eat you shall make your count for the lamb. Your lamb shall be without blemish, a male a year old. You may take it from the sheep or from the goats, and you shall keep it until the fourteenth day of this month, when the whole assembly of the congregation of Israel shall kill their lambs at twilight. “Then they shall take some of the blood and put it on the two doorposts and the lintel of the houses in which they eat it. They shall eat the flesh that night, roasted on the fire; with unleavened bread and bitter herbs they shall eat it. Do not eat any of it raw or boiled in water, but roasted, its head with its legs and its inner parts. And you shall let none of it remain until the morning; anything that remains until the morning you shall burn. In this manner you shall eat it: with your belt fastened, your sandals on your feet, and your staff in your hand. And you shall eat it in haste. It is the Lord’s Passover. For I will pass through the land of Egypt that night, and I will strike all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgments: I am the Lord. The blood shall be a sign for you, on the houses where you are. And when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and no plague will befall you to destroy you, when I strike the land of Egypt.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...