Dispensationalism - yea or nay.

[1689Dave]

You are back to giving Apostolic pronouncments, like your view settles it all!

Call it what you want, I'm still here with solutions.

 

[1689Dave]

You are the expert on playing rather than answering.

How can I answer your charge and not incur more ridicule?

 

[TCassidy]

How can I answer your charge and not incur more ridicule?

You can go back and honestly respond to John's posts.

 

[TCassidy]

Call it what you want, I'm still here with solutions.

No, you are not. John asks you a question and you avoid answering it. John makes a valid point from the scriptures and you ignore it.

 

[1689Dave]

No, you are not. John asks you a question and you avoid answering it. John makes a valid point from the scriptures and you ignore it.

I gave him a better answer, a solution for all his questions.

 

[1689Dave]

You can go back and honestly respond to John's posts.

I did better, He knows now why his questions do not add up.

 

[TCassidy]

I did better, He knows now why his questions do not add up.

You still refuse to engage him in honest discussion.

 

[TCassidy]

I gave him a better answer, a solution for all his questions.

You gave nothing. Hollow folly with no substance.

 

[1689Dave]

You still refuse to engage him in honest discussion.

I answered him in the best way possible. Showing that his questions miss the mark because he does not understand the nature of the Church in both testaments.

 

[1689Dave]

You gave nothing. Hollow folly with no substance.

I defined the Church according to Stephen and BDAG. With more to follow if he shows up again.

 

[TCassidy]

As this thread has run its course, John has given up trying to get an honest answer to his scriptural input, and Dave still refuses to respond honestly, I am closing this thread. Enough is enough.