• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Dispensationalism

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by UZThD:
I don't wish to argue anymore dispensationalism with friend It.

But:

Romans 3:28 "justified 'pistei."
Hebrews 11:17 "offered Isaac pistei"

Same dative singular of pistos. Why should one be thought to mean BY faith and another THROUGH faith?

Bill
I like to inform and be informed.

Romans 3: 27-31:I read this as we (both Jew and Gentile)today can come Through Jesus Christ, who fulfilled the law, and we are dead to the law, for in Him we then establish (demonstrate) that law by our faith.

In verse 30, "Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith" I see By faith they were circumcised, where we coming through Christ Jesus are circumcised and baptized without hands,Colossians 2:11.

Also from another angle, how could any before Christ come Through His Faith in His Father to raise Him from the dead, or Through His Blood until it was Shed? They had to come By faith, for they didn't even know His name. They had to endure until the end By Faith the Father would save by His Mercy and Grace for God made a two-way covenant with His people, and made promises to them. Christian faith, ituttut Galatians 1:11-12
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
ituttut

Your posts above are essentially nonsense. Form what little is understandable you appear to assert that the Body of Jesus Christ is the Church and that the Bride of Jesus Christ is Israel. If that it is your contention it is totally false.

In 2 Corinthians11:2 For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. Paul is obviously talking about the Church as the Bride of Jesus Christ. In Ephesians 5 Paul talks about the Church as the Bride of Jesus Christ.

Your remarks from Reveletion are applicable to events that occur after the creation of the New Heavens and New earth. You also ignore that the twelve Apostles are presented as the foundations of the New Jerusalem, the Bride of Jesus Christ which is obviously the Church.

Dispensationalism is in its death throes because its interpretation of Scripture is false. Hyper-dispensationalism is dead because it ignores most of Scripture and interprets what little it considers falsely.

Once again there is only one Gospel, the Gospel that Jesus Christ and all the Apostles including Paul preached. To contend otherwise is heretical as Paul stated in Galatians

I leave you to stew in your pathetically false doctrine [speaking kindly].

wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
 

exscentric

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"I leave you to stew in your pathetically false doctrine [speaking kindly]."

Not sure how you could say that was a kind comment no matter how many imonicons you use. IMHO of course.

"Dispensationalism is in its death throes"



Be sure to post the obituary here, if you are still alive that is
laugh.gif


You should live so long!

Mean time while I wait for notice of the funeral I will
sleeping_2.gif


[ July 20, 2005, 08:17 PM: Message edited by: exscentric ]
 

Paul33

New Member
Dispensationalism is on its death bed, this is why LaHaye opened his pre-trib research center at LU. It was in reaction to the growing ground swell of post-trib teaching in evangelical and former dispensational circles!

I for one will be pleased when we can put dispensational teaching to rest.
 

UZThD

New Member
Originally posted by ituttut:


But:

Romans 3:28 "justified 'pistei."
Hebrews 11:17 "offered Isaac pistei"

Same dative singular of pistos. Why should one be thought to mean BY faith and another THROUGH faith?

Bill [/qb]
I like to inform and be informed.


In verse 30, "Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith"


===
re Rom 3:30

IMO, the use of the two prepositions is either but a rhetorical device with no intended difference (eg see, Cranfield, Murray, EF Harrison ) or the apostle uses ek to indicate source and dia agency (eg, see Robertson, Lenski). In either case, none of these exegetes find there what you do. But we both will believe what we will.
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by OldRegular:
ituttut

Your posts above are essentially nonsense. Form what little is understandable you appear to assert that the Body of Jesus Christ is the Church and that the Bride of Jesus Christ is Israel. If that it is your contention it is totally false.

Peter tells us Paul is hard to understand, so all I suggest is all should pay heed to Peter. Why don’t you try reading, and understanding Ephesians 3? You either agree with what Christ Jesus told Paul from heaven, or you believe someone else, and from what you write you do not believe Christ Jesus has He sits next to His Father in heaven.

If you are not in the Body of Christ, then just whose church are you in. You evidently believe the Baptist church is going to save you.

In 2 Corinthians11:2 For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. Paul is obviously talking about the Church as the Bride of Jesus Christ. In Ephesians 5 Paul talks about the Church as the Bride of Jesus Christ.

I don’t believe you quite understand what you are saying. In your first paragraph you deny we are in the Body of Christ. Now here you are saying the Church is the Bride of Jesus Christ?

Which is it? I explained to you in my previous post that we inherit Christ Jesus, and are connected to Him NOW, in the Spirit, not what you are contending is in prophecy as revealed in Revelation.

When the trump sounds, Christ Jesus will present to Himself a Church that is without blemish, and holy without spot or wrinkle, and this will be done for all the host of heaven to see. Is there marriage in Heaven? The New Jerusalem that comes down from heaven is connected with the earthly Apostles, and that equates only to God’s people. A marriage can then take place.


Your remarks from Reveletion are applicable to events that occur after the creation of the New Heavens and New earth. You also ignore that the twelve Apostles are presented as the foundations of the New Jerusalem, the Bride of Jesus Christ which is obviously the Church.

Again you fail to understand for you make the wrong assumption. There are two foundation’s built upon the foundation of Jesus Christ. You have your foundation combined, i.e. the foundation of Peter, and the foundation of Paul.

For your understanding: Romans 15:20, ”Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation”.” Paul says he will not build on Peter’s foundation. Tell me, whose foundation are you on? I Corinthians 3:10, ”According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon.”

Are you building on the Pentecostal foundation of Peter, or the Christian foundation of Paul. They are both built on the foundation of Jesus Christ.

All the churches of Christianity are built on the foundation of Paul and not Peter. How many churches did Peter start? There was one, and that was in Jerusalem, for the nation of Israel. You said it above when you advise me, ”You also ignore that the twelve Apostles are presented as the foundations of the New Jerusalem.” But then you misidentify the Bride.

The Bridegroom is Jesus as shown in Matthew 9:15, and only Israel is involved, so who is His bride? Isaiah 54:5-7, ” For thy Maker is thine husband; the Lord of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called. 6. For the Lord hath called thee as a woman forsaken and grieved in spirit, and a wife of youth, when thou wast refused, saith thy God. 7. For a small moment have I forsaken thee; but with great mercies will I gather thee.” The Bride you refer to in prophecy of Revelation is Israel as “thee” refers to God’s people.

Dispensationalism is in its death throes because its interpretation of Scripture is false. Hyper-dispensationalism is dead because it ignores most of Scripture and interprets what little it considers falsely.

Then you are helping to personally lead people astray, not understanding the dispensation’s, for Christ Jesus gave Paul the gospel of His (Christ’s) dispensation of Grace – Ephesians 3:1-5, ”For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2. If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3. How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4. Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5. Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit”. I don’t know how many times I have shown you this, and you still refuse to believe Christ from heaven. You are on very dangerous ground. Please turn to Christ Jesus for understanding.

Once again there is only one Gospel, the Gospel that Jesus Christ and all the Apostles including Paul preached. To contend otherwise is heretical as Paul stated in Galatians

I’ll show you three gospels, and it is up to you to believe which you believe. You’re salvation is between you and God, not you and what you have been reading, or what I say, or anyone else; Just one on one, you and God.

Do you believe Jesus on earth? Then believe this – ”The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it”, Luke 16:16. Do you believe Jesus while on the earth? There was a gospel of the law and prophets UNTIL John. Then after John there is the gospel of the “kingdom of God”. That is TWO (2) gospels. And you say they are all the same. So which of those do you believe? I’ll bet you chose the gospel of John the Baptist, which is as preached in Matthew, chapter 3:1-2, ”In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea, 2. And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”

You say there is only One gospel. What is that gospel? You evidently believe it is the above, and then you endeavor to say that is the gospel that Paul preached. Shame, shame.

Haven’t you heard of the gospel of Christ Jesus from Heaven, that dispensational gospel that Christ gave specifically to Paul? It is the gospel of Christianity, the Gospel that puts us into the Church, into the Body of Christ, and it is of Grace, through faith, with out works of repenting of our sins, and being water baptized, as was necessary for the Jews. Our repentance and remission of sins was taken care of by Jesus Christ at the Cross. You cannot find this third gospel of the Cross preached before Damascus Road.

I leave you to stew in your pathetically false doctrine [speaking kindly].

wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
wave.gif
I’ll not do as you and slander any and everybody, calling them heretical. I only call you “confused” believing just like the Catholic church, and other’s that come from her, with some members building on the foundation of the Jew, which is on the foundation of Peter.
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by exscentric:
"I leave you to stew in your pathetically false doctrine [speaking kindly]."

Not sure how you could say that was a kind comment no matter how many imonicons you use. IMHO of course.

"Dispensationalism is in its death throes"



Be sure to post the obituary here, if you are still alive that is
laugh.gif


You should live so long!

Mean time while I wait for notice of the funeral I will
sleeping_2.gif
Very appropriate
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by Paul33:
Dispensationalism is on its death bed, this is why LaHaye opened his pre-trib research center at LU. It was in reaction to the growing ground swell of post-trib teaching in evangelical and former dispensational circles!

I for one will be pleased when we can put dispensational teaching to rest.
No problem. You can do it right now.

There are many that wish to dismiss Paul. If you really mean this, then never refer to him again, other than giving reference to him standing looking at, bringing on and allowing the stoning of Steven. Try it please, and see what you understand. You will understand the “law and the prophets”, and the gospel of John the Baptist. Remember, never ever quote PAUL again. Your wish will come true, being rid of Christ Jesus in heaven forever.
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
Originally posted by Paul33:
I for one will be pleased when we can put dispensational teaching to rest.
Have i got a bargin for you

at the pretribulation rapture/resurrection by Jesus
at the end of the Dispensation of Grace, we will
quit teaching God's Economy (AKA: 'dispensation'
doctrine) as found in the Bible.

Too bad you will have to go Home with Jesus
with us ;)
 

Paul33

New Member
Originally posted by ituttut:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Paul33:
Dispensationalism is on its death bed, this is why LaHaye opened his pre-trib research center at LU. It was in reaction to the growing ground swell of post-trib teaching in evangelical and former dispensational circles!

I for one will be pleased when we can put dispensational teaching to rest.
No problem. You can do it right now.

There are many that wish to dismiss Paul. If you really mean this, then never refer to him again, other than giving reference to him standing looking at, bringing on and allowing the stoning of Steven. Try it please, and see what you understand. You will understand the “law and the prophets”, and the gospel of John the Baptist. Remember, never ever quote PAUL again. Your wish will come true, being rid of Christ Jesus in heaven forever.
</font>[/QUOTE]I have made it a general rule never to respond to you, but I've got to tell you, your last post was so absurd that I couldn't resist telling you.
 

Paul33

New Member
Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Paul33:
I for one will be pleased when we can put dispensational teaching to rest.
Have i got a bargin for you

at the pretribulation rapture/resurrection by Jesus
at the end of the Dispensation of Grace, we will
quit teaching God's Economy (AKA: 'dispensation'
doctrine) as found in the Bible.

Too bad you will have to go Home with Jesus
with us ;)
</font>[/QUOTE]Hey Ed,

What did you think of the "two ages" of Jesus Christ? Pretty nifty, eh?

This age and the age to come (eternity)!

I'm with him!
 

av1611jim

New Member
Funny aint it Paul?

You and I are in agreement on another thread, but here we do disagree.

I think a moderate dispensational approach to Scripture is valid.

But some approaches which appear to be "hyper-dispensational" are clearly out there!

TEE HEE (mocking ed)

In HIS service;
Jim
 

Paul33

New Member
Jim,

I would call myself a progressive dispensationalist with a post-trib view of the rapture.

I'm just yanking Ed's chain.

TEE HEE!
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by ituttut:
I don’t believe you quite understand what you are saying. In your first paragraph you deny we are in the Body of Christ. Now here you are saying the Church is the Bride of Jesus Christ?
I understand now why you are hyper-dispensational. You can't understand more than one thought at a time. I wrote:
Your posts above are essentially nonsense. From what little is understandable you appear to assert that the Body of Jesus Christ is the Church and that the Bride of Jesus Christ is Israel. If that it is your contention it is totally false.
Please show me where I said that the Church was not the Body of Jesus Christ.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
ituttut

The Apostle Paul is the one who said that anyone who taught that there was more than one Gospel was a heretic, at least he said let them be accursed.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
ituttut

I was going to quit responding yo your posts. However On reading the last two I noted that you had either grossly misrepresented some of my statements or lied about them. I may respond to all your lies and misrepresentations of my earlier posts, I may not. However I will say three things:

1. I quit responding to posts by dispensationalists because it was useless and they took great delight in questioning the salvation of any one who was not a dispensationalist.

2. There is only one people of God, those who have been redeemed by the blood of Jesus Christ. The Southern Baptist Faith and Message adopted by the Southern Baptist Convention in Atlanta, Georgia on June 14, 2000 writes of the Church in Section VI as follows: “The New Testament speaks also of the Church as the Body of Christ which includes all the redeemed of all the ages, believers from every tribe, and tongue, and people, and nation.”

3. Hyper-dispensationalism is gross error at best and heretical at worst and that is in essential agreement with those who call themselves dispensationalists. An example of the heretical teaching promulgated by you on this thread is that there is more than one Gospel. Those are not my words they are Paul's.
 
Top