I am an Armenian by blood! My great-grandfather actually came from Armenia!Originally posted by TexasSky:
Well, I am not Calvinist or Armenian.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I am an Armenian by blood! My great-grandfather actually came from Armenia!Originally posted by TexasSky:
Well, I am not Calvinist or Armenian.
to anwser..NOOriginally posted by StefanM:
I have heard some say that Calvinists do not speak about election/predestination until after an individual is converted. I can't recall who said this, but I'm sure it was a non-Calvinist, so I would like to hear it from the Calvinists.
Do you tell the unsaved about election/predestination before conversion?
In other words the teaching of Predestination is given to the Saints for their comfort but it offers nothing to those who are unconverted and may confuse them. The unconverted need to be preached the Gospel NOT Predestination for this doctrine is given to the saints for their encouragement.As the godly consideration of Predestination, and our Election in Christ, is full of sweet, pleasant, and unspeakable comfort to godly persons, and such as feel in themselves the working of the Spirit of Christ, mortifying the works of the flesh, and their earthly members, and drawing up their mind to high and heavenly things, as well because it doth greatly establish and confirm their faith of eternal Salvation to be enjoyed through Christ, as
because it doth fervently kindle their love towards God: So, for curious and carnal persons, lacking the Spirit of Christ, to have continually before their eyes the sentence of
God's Predestination, is a most dangerous downfall, whereby the Devil doth thrust them either into desperation, or into wrethchlessness of most unclean living, no less perilous than desperation.
http://www.baptistboard.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi/topic/35/1384.html?Originally posted by TexasSky:
Well, I am not Calvinist or Armenian.
I am a Christian.
How in the world can you think that obedience to God doesn't matter?Originally posted by TexasSky:
And there it is again, you don't evangelize because you really believe that man must accept Christ, you do it "because God said to." You don't really think it matters.
I resent the tone and content of this post.Originally posted by TexasSky:
According to Calvinism - If God wanted the man saved - he didn't need to "accept" Christ. If God wanted the man to go to hell - he couldn't accept Christ.
So why do you evangelize?
I asked many Calvinists on this board why they proclaim the message of Christ since they believe it really was all pre-determined. Over and over and over they said, "Because God told me to."
And by the way - If you have to "hide what you really believe" from people "until after" they are hooked - you are NOT standing on Holy Ground.
You're standing on Mormon ground.
That is untrue. It is unkind and unloving for you to say stuff like that. Of course man must accept Christ. Virtually the only people here who dispute that are primitive Baptists. They can defend themselves on that. I think they are dead wrong.Originally posted by TexasSky:
And there it is again, you don't evangelize because you really believe that man must accept Christ, you do it "because God said to." You don't really think it matters. "Its a mystery."
Calvinist and Armenian aren't opposed. One can be a Calvinist Armenian. One cannot be a Calvinist Arminian. Based on what you have said here, the position you hold is arminian.Well, I am not Calvinist or Armenian.
So am I.I am a Christian.
Yes indeed. That is the Calvinist gospel.Christ said, "Believe on the Lord with all your heart and thou shalt be saved." Belief is a personal thing. It requires a choice.
No one claims he does.He offers His love. He doesn't commit some kind of spiritual rape.
Diane, You have now been corrected on this three times I believe. Why do you keep repeating somethign that is not true? I didn't choose you to come over for dinner last night. That doesn't mean I chose you to go somewhere else. It simply means that I didn't choose you. You insist on adding to God's word.Originally posted by dianetavegia:
To not choose for salvation is to select for hell!
I don't know of any place in Revelation where foreknowledge is used, much less in this manner. I have done a quick search and can't find it. Please tell me what you are talking about.Foreknowledge is used of those going to hell in your aforementioned verse in Revelation on another thread.
There is nothing to be sorry about. This is a discussion about Scripture. We talk about what it says and what it means. The Bible says that God chose you to salvation from the beginning. You say he didn't. What are we to make of that?I'm sorry, Larry and other Calvinists, but nothing any of you have said has proven anything to me.
Yes it is, which is why it boggles my mind that you don't see it.The Holy Spirit and God's word is quite clear on this issue.
You are not an arminian because CAlvinists think so. You are an ariminian because of what you believe. The hinge of this issue is on unconditional election. You deny it. That makes you an arminian. Why are you so opposed to that? I would prefer not to be called a CAlvinist. What I believe is simply the gospel of Scripture revealed by God. But historically, a label got attached to it and so that is a label that tells you what I believe. It is simply a fact of history.As far as my being Arminian because Calvinists think so,
We don't want that label attached, but that label helps others to know what people believe. Being arminian or CAlvinist doesn't mean you buy the whole farm. It simply describes your view on how God works his salvation in the world. You are really making a mountain out of a mole hill.Why oh Why would we want some man's name attached to our beliefs when all that really matters is that I'm a child of the KING!
Originally posted by dianetavegia:
To not choose for salvation is to select for hell!
Originally posted by Pastor Larry: Diane, You have now been corrected on this three times I believe. Why do you keep repeating somethign that is not true? I didn't choose you to come over for dinner last night. That doesn't mean I chose you to go somewhere else. It simply means that I didn't choose you. You insist on adding to God's word.
Which proves my point exactly. You are basing your theology, not on Scripture, but on reasoning.But Larry, this reasoning makes no sense.
No it's not. They were going to damnation anyway because of their free choice to sin. YOu have a strange conundrum. You don't want God to intervene in man's free will, but then you object that he doesn't. That doesn't seem to fit.To NOT chose someone for salvation IS TO CHOSE them for damnation.
I don't know any published stats. I know that the founder's movement in the SBC is growing. Historically, CAlvinists have been the most evangelistic in their outreach. I know of very few arminian churches that are planting churches and growing. The churches that are doing that that I know of are Calvinistic churches.I believe Calvinists are in the vast minority in Baptist churches but are more vocal. Do you know if there are any published stats?
Diane replies: According to you, I could know of the cross and know of the need for the cross and yet not be chosen as one of the elect. YES, if I knew you were feeding the hungry and I was starving for food, I’d feel left out and passed over. Would you preach a sermon and outright state that you are preaching only to those whom God elected?Pastor Larry says: You cannot understand how these fit together. I am perfectly willing to believe that God meant what he said with all of these things. You want to deny at least one of them, and instead force unbiblicaly and unnecessary implications for those who accept it.
Let me ask you this: Did you feel left out or passed over, or unchosen because I didn't invite you to dinner last night? I doubt it. You know good and well and that I did not choose you not to come. I made a choice that left you to do your own thing.
Diane said earlier: To NOT chose someone for salvation IS TO CHOSE them for damnation.
Diane replies: God clearly tells us in Romans 11:32 that, "God has bound all men over to disobedience so that He may have mercy on them all."Pastor Larry replied: No it's not. They were going to damnation anyway because of their free choice to sin. YOu have a strange conundrum. You don't want God to intervene in man's free will, but then you object that he doesn't. That doesn't seem to fit.
Diane replies: No, I don’t think the truth is determined by how many follow a teaching but I noticed that the majority who replied in a poll here claim to be non Calvinists and yet the majority who post in the C/A forum are Calvinists. The silent majority, as it were...Pastor Larry said: But what difference does it make? You surely don't believe that truth is decided by how many churches subscribe to something do you? Truth has always been rejected by people who want to preserve their own autonomy. I think that plays a huge role in this discussion.
Calvinism doesn't dispute that. If that is why you are rejecting Calvinism, then you need to give it up.Originally posted by dianetavegia:
Here is what Scripture says:
1. God chooses people to salvation (2 Thess 2:13; Eph 1:4; etc.)
Diane replies: The Bible says in 1 Timothy 2:4, "God our Savior wants all men to be saved and come to a knowledge of the truth."
This is the direct answer to your question about God being at fault for peopel who don't believe. He is not at fault.Romans 3:3 [passage snipped]
That verse doesn't actually say that. The "once for all" is a word that refers to "once for all time" not for all people. That would be said a different way. Howevewr, most Calvinists believe that Jesus death was sufficient for all sins for all time for all sinners. Man is kept from the redeeming power of hte atonement only by his own unwillingness.The following scripture tells us that Jesus died for all and not just some pre selected group!
Romans 6:10 For the death that He died, He died to sin once for all; but the life that He lives, He lives to God. 11 Likewise you also, reckon yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus our Lord.
The same word is used in John 21:11. Were those fished saved? Or will you admit that the word helkuo has different meanings in different contexts?Diane replies: The Bible says in John 6:44, "no one can come to me unless the Father who sent Me draws him." The same word "draw" is used in John 12:32 which says, "But I, when I am lifted up from the earth will draw all men unto myself."
Diane, there is no gentle way to put this, but to say that this is a direct denial of Scripture. It is unconscionable. The Bible says that God chooses us to salvation, and the result of that is glorification (Rom 8:29-30; 2 Tim 2:10, etc). To say that God doesn't elect for heaven is to say that God lied. I don't think you want to do that. I don't think you intend that. But you have no other alternative.Diane replies: I agree with your first statement, BECAUSE God doesn’t elect for heaven either!
Happens all the time. Judas walked with Christ for three years and knew it all and was not one of the elect.Diane replies: According to you, I could know of the cross and know of the need for the cross and yet not be chosen as one of the elect.
HEre is the problem. The unelect aren't hungry for God. They aren't seeking him and do not desire him. That is, again, the plain teaching of Scripture.YES, if I knew you were feeding the hungry and I was starving for food, I’d feel left out and passed over.
Of course not because I never preach only to the elect. I preach to those who show up. Some are elect and some aren't.Would you preach a sermon and outright state that you are preaching only to those whom God elected?
They are free will to accept his Son. They can do that whenever they desire to, whenever they are willing. For all your talk about free will, you want to leave it out. Sin renders their free will free to sin. They don't want to do anything else.God gave them FREE WILL to sin but not FREE WILL to accept the gift of His SON?
No, it's not cruel at all. It is the act of a loving God redeeming those with no hope. Christ came because there was some elected. If no one was elected, then his death was in vain. No one will believe unless they are elected. For Christ to have come to a world of non-elect would have been a wasted death, and that is what would hvae been cruel.Why have Jesus die such a horrible death if the ones to obtain heaven had already been selected? Is that not the most cruel action?
You say I have a conundrum but then don't point it out. I have no problem with God intervening in man's free will. I have no problem with God not intervening. But you still have this nonsensical idea that election to something is also election to something else. It isn't. Even in something so simple as a presidential election (which is a flawed analogy in many ways), I voted for someone; I didn't vote for the other person to not be president. I didn't elect them at all. When God elects to salvation; he doesn't elect others to not be saved. They were already unsaved. God simply leaves them that way. Why is that hard for you to believe? Why do you continue with this nonsensical position that you have no Scripture for?And YOU have a strange conundrum. You don't want God to intervene in man's free will to accept Christ Jesus as Lord and Savior by saying God 'elected' those He wanted, but then you object God doesn't elect others for hell. That doesn't fit. Heaven or Hell. There's only 2 options! If Calvinism is correct, either God elects men for heaven or He elects men for hell.
But again I ask what's the relevance? The silent majority may be silent wisely, because they don't know or can't defend their position. Many of them have a totally warped idea about what Calvinism is. And a poll on this board is not the least bit scientific or accurate. I didn't vote in it. What this polled revealed is that 39% of the people who bothered to answer would claim to be a Calvinist. They may or may not claim that rightly. I would be willing to bet that the primitives on here said they weren't. That means that people who believe in the sovereingty of God in salvation didn't claim the label that typically goes with them.No, I don’t think the truth is determined by how many follow a teaching but I noticed that the majority who replied in a poll here claim to be non Calvinists and yet the majority who post in the C/A forum are Calvinists. The silent majority, as it were...
POLL: How many Calvinists on the board?
I consider myself to be a Calvinist. 39%
I do not consider myself to be a Calvinist. 61%
No, it's a denial or YOUR interpretation of scripture. The Holy Spirit speaks otherwise to me and no 'bullying' with remarks such as that above will change my belief.Diane, there is no gentle way to put this, but to say that this is a direct denial of Scripture. It is unconscionable.