Diane, this is not true. I have repeatedly mentioned passages such as Rom 11:2, where "foreknowledge" cannot mean simply knowing ahead of time. There, "foreknowledge" is what sets Israel apart from every other nation. IF foreknowledge means simply knowing ahead of time, you would be impugning the omniscience of God. He knew every nation, but Israel was his special choice. He foreknew them.Originally posted by dianetavegia:
You gave no scripture to prove your 'feelings' on foreknowledge, only what you THINK it means.
Even in Rom 8:29-30, if you follow the passage, you have to admit that foreknowledge means more than simply knowing ahead of time. In the passage, all who are foreknown are glorified. If you believe foreknowledge is simply knowing ahead of time, does not God "foreknow" those who will not believe? If he "foreknows" that they will not believe, then how are they included in teh foreknown who are glorified? They can't be. Foreknowledge has to mean more.
Don't tell me I haven't supported it when you know good and well that I have.
I didn't really offer any opinion, Diane. I simply explained what the text says.Opinion, opinion, opinion...
That's not true. I did not say you called God a liar. I said that your position leads to that conclusion on some things, and I believe I specifically said I didn't think you did that. I get my conversations mixed up, but I usually add that disclaimer. I don't think anyone here intends to call God a liar. I think that many (on both sides, such as JohnP) have problems avoiding that conclusion. Some people are ignorant. That's no secret. When someone says Calvinists don't believe you have to believe to be saved, that is ignorant ... meaning "unknowing." As for integrity, you bring that up again after I explained it. I specifically said on two instances, including the original one as I recall, that I was not questioning your integrity. Why would you accuse me of somethign I specifically did not do?and yet no one else is allowed to have an opinion without being told they are calling God a liar, are ignorant or lack integrity!
You were never told that by me, and that is a dumb thing for someone to say. But there are dumb Calvinists, and dumb arminians. Neither side has a corner on stupidity and boorishness.I've even been told either I'm a Calvinist and don't know it or am unsaved.
Diane submits: Agree. God knows ahead of time who will and will not surrender to the call to salvation made available to ALL through the death of Christ Jesus on Golgotha. </font>[/QUOTE]You didn't agree with what I said. I was pointing out that foreknowledge does not mean simply knowing ahead of time in these cases.]Larry claims: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />That means "foreknow" doesn't simply mean knowing before hand because God "foreknows" who won't believe as well, and they are not glorified.
You are using a different definition of called. Don't get confused. There is a general call, an effectual call. There is a call to a specific function of role. We, in this debate, are talking about the effectual call as shown in Rom 8:30, 1 Cor 1:22ff., etc.Judas was called as a disciple and not justified nor glorified. The rich man was called but refused to be justified and glorified.
What about those who 'turned aside'? During their turning, were they being 'glorified, justified'?[/qutoe][/qb]Exactly my point. They were "effectually called to salvation." They had a different call. This is basic Calvinism which would be helpful to understand before trying to refute it.
No, not at all. I have changed my views to fit the text of Scripture. That is why I believe God does love the whole world without exception. That is why I believe Christ did die for the world. In fact, you will find that most Calvinists believe that.Pastor Larry said: They can't handle this text justly because they hvae a greater priority--to maintain their theological system.
Diane replies: Are you not doing the very same thing?